Luka Doncic traded to Lakers for Anthony Davis (Shams) He might be hacked?? IDK* ITS REAL DAMMIT

Is this gonna have major ramifications??

  • Yes players era is over

    Votes: 19 28.8%
  • Nah Nico is just a dummy

    Votes: 47 71.2%

  • Total voters
    66

Bigwhite2498

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,180
Reputation
216
Daps
9,226
Or you know, you don't put it out there that Luka is on the block and wait until the offseason before jumping out the window by taking the first offer -- worse yet -- getting haggled down from the original offer when you're the one with the treasure. The fact that Pelinka managed to lowball him on the original trade is even more mindboggling.

There was absolutely no reason for Nico to trade Luka when he did. Luka didn't want out and nobody thought he was on the market.
How is low balling to get a top 5 player and a really good 3 and d player plus a first round pick
 

lib123

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
6,754
Reputation
481
Daps
13,954
Seen some comments hinting at the NBA hitting him hard for tanking once again and him selling being the compromise. Could be bullshyt (probably is) but you never know.

Nah that don’t make sense. He didn’t really tank that year, the Mavs just lost the last two or so games so they didn’t have to give up the protected pick that became Lively. On Reddit people were saying he went big investing in crypto and NFT companies before the bust and might’ve needed the cash.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
85,398
Reputation
9,457
Daps
231,108
Underrated post. You know where you need to improve because it cost you a championship, but you still come in outta shape and no better on the defensive end of the court. I understand you're a MEGA star, but damn meet me halfway at least.

Honestly, this is the same problem I had with Dirk when he got Avery Johnson fired because he didn't play defense.
Underrated post?

It's a nonsensical one.

Luka's defense, or this perceived lack thereof, wasn't the reason why the Mavs lost the Finals. Anyone that's trying to claim so doesn't understand hoops. It's low-hanging fruit, when in reality, it doesn't even register on the radar on why Boston beat them. You think that if you perceived his defense to be even average that it would've changed anything in that series? It would've meant Kyrie didn't go MIA on offense? That all the other role players actually provided consistent offense?

The Celtics' defense drowned the life out of the Mavs offense, so much so, that Luka was the only one to keep his head above the surface. I can't possibly fathom why anyone would single out his defense as the reason for why they lost that series, especially when the Celtics only averaged 101 points. It's not as if Boston completely overwhelmed the Mavs with dominant offensive play (their best player couldn't even get it going on the side of the floor). It's that the Mavs offense shyt the bed and couldn't deal with the defense that the Celtics threw at them.

Why put the spotlight on Luka's defense when it was the Mavs lack of offensive production which ended up being their demise?

You even made it worse by saying that it's the same problem you had with Dirk, when he literally ended up winning a title as a centerpiece. And let's be honest here, without that generational whistle that DWade had in the 2006 Finals, this wouldn't even be a talking point.
 

ECA

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,788
Reputation
855
Daps
19,005
Reppin
NULL
Underrated post?

It's a nonsensical one.

Luka's defense, or this perceived lack thereof, wasn't the reason why the Mavs lost the Finals. Anyone that's trying to claim so doesn't understand hoops. It's low-hanging fruit, when in reality, it doesn't even register on the radar on why Boston beat them. You think that if you perceived his defense to be even average that it would've changed anything in that series? It would've meant Kyrie didn't go MIA on offense? That all the other role players actually provided consistent offense?

The Celtics' defense drowned the life out of the Mavs offense, so much so, that Luka was the only one to keep his head above the surface. I can't possibly fathom why anyone would single out his defense as the reason for why they lost that series, especially when the Celtics only averaged 101 points. It's not as if Boston completely overwhelmed the Mavs with dominant offensive play (their best player couldn't even get it going on the side of the floor). It's that the Mavs offense shyt the bed and couldn't deal with the defense that the Celtics threw at them.

Why put the spotlight on Luka's defense when it was the Mavs lack of offensive production which ended up being their demise?

You even made it worse by saying that it's the same problem you had with Dirk, when he literally ended up winning a title as a centerpiece. And let's be honest here, without that generational whistle that DWade had in the 2006 Finals, this wouldn't even be a talking point.
Kyrie average more than 20 points per game and 48% ts they have a shot at being at least competitive in that series
 

Rigby.

The #1 Rated Mixtape of all Time
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
50,578
Reputation
1,929
Daps
72,322
Reppin
JordanHareStadium
Seen some comments hinting at the NBA hitting him hard for tanking once again and him selling being the compromise. Could be bullshyt (probably is) but you never know.
Why would they make Dallas give up a top 5 player for blowing like 10 games, rather than just take their lottery pick away lol
 

ALonelyDad

Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
74,935
Reputation
9,029
Daps
330,854
AD is great and will do his part, for the Mavs..the bigger question will be if Kyrie can be the main back court guy now with no Luka. AD is a unique star where he really can't get his own consistently even though his impact is great, you need a excellent shot creator with him, which Kyrie is but he's had a lot of struggles as being the #1 option in playoffs.

Now if this was Luka and AD, I would have put them as the favorites
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
56,865
Reputation
12,326
Daps
379,641
Reppin
CHICAGO
AD is great and will do his part, for the Mavs..the bigger question will be if Kyrie can be the main back court guy now with no Luka. AD is a unique star where he really can't get his own consistently even though his impact is great, you need a excellent shot creator with him, which Kyrie is but he's had a lot of struggles as being the #1 option in playoffs.

Now if this was Luka and AD, I would have put them as the favorites

AD DOESN'T STRUGGLE GETTING HIS OWN
THE LAKERS SIMPLY STOP
GIVING HIM THE BALL
EVEN WHEN HES KILLING.

IVE SEEN IT HAPPEN
TOO MANY TIMES

HES NOT A PERIMETER PLAYER
SO HE STILLS DEPENDS
ON HIS TEAMMATES TO GIVE
HIM THE BALL
:devil:
:evil:
 
Top