They’re not equal but that doesn’t mean it’s a lopsided trade. Both teams gained and lost without a clear winner.
Luka incredible offensively but has weight issues and lack of commitment on the defensive end.
AD incredible defensively and still gives you 25/30 points, has injury issues and is getting older.
The role players on the Mavs might be better than the Lakers as far as fit and the Lakers gave up arguably their most consistent one, only 21.
Lakers have Knecht and Reaves so I wanna see how it plays it out but honestly…the trade still doesn’t make sense.
In the last three seasons:
- Luka took the Mavs to the WCF in 2022 (losing to the eventual champions Warriors, where he was arguably the best player in the series)
- Luka took the Mavs to the Finals in 2024 (where he was definitively the best player on offense in the series).
I don't understand why y'all keep putting all this emphasis on his
weight issues and lack of commitment on defense. It's completely irrelevant in this context because he's a top-3 player and has proven himself to be the #1 option on a contending team. He brought that franchise back from irrelevancy, both on the court and their monetary value as an NBA aegis.
Even if the perceived issues you had of him didn't exist, nothing would've changed over the last three years, so what possible logical reason could there be to trade him?
There isn't one.
The best that AD could do leading a team was get them out of the 1st round,
one time. He couldn't even get the Pels on the map, in any sense of the word.
Beyond how lopsided this trade is in a vacuum, when Kyrie and AD both end up inevitably declining and the Mavs need to retool, what star is going to willingly want to go to Dallas after how they disposed of Luka like they did? This is going to deter free agents and any players who're they're wanting to draft in the future as long as the Adelsons own the Mavs.