Anyone surprised?
These low information “both sides” nikkas always end up on that side
These low information “both sides” nikkas always end up on that side
From what I heard her say she sounded positive. She supports reparations and such and doesn’t shy away from addressing it. I never took time to do deep research into her party.This is a socially ignorant idea as well. As it wpuld create an open divisive Door to allow kuklos to win.
Again. Even mentioning any small party alternative is cap.
Please watch the updated links posted.
If not.
Your udc level education is showing.
Art Barr
Only difference between uneducated bothsiders and MAGA hillbillies is skin colorAnyone surprised?
These low information “both sides” nikkas always end up on that side
Damn near all of Brand Nubian going with Trump now?
I assume you meant that metaphorically?Lord Jamar = dead
theyre dumb and wanna be relevantWhy is it so many of our brothers bucking for trump? What’s going on here
Jill stein the same person represented by trumps lawyer? Same person that only wants to take votes from democrats but never republicans? Same person republican donors push on the low cause they know only left leaning democrats would vote for her?Personally I would vote for Jill Stein, from what I have gathered about her.
Perhaps Jamar isn’t aware of this. Btw, he’s not willing to vote a woman in to office. So that’s off the table regardless.
Trump has said some off things like SOB (sons of bytches to Black men who took the knee against police brutality). He never apologized, logically since he is a narcissist. Narcissist don’t apologize.
From what I heard her say she sounded positive. She supports reparations and such and doesn’t shy away from addressing it. I never took time to do deep research into her party.
In addition to my previous post about Jamar. He mentioned that Kamala Emhoff would be incapable of handling situations like Iran-Israel and the Taliban conflict. He argued that Trump had no wars (which is not true, because they used the MOAB). Trump does things sneaky. Dems do to btw.
Jamar claimed that the Dems used satellite images, then corrected himself and said rather from the “sataloon”.
However, on the Godfrey the Comedian platform he argued that satellites are fake. This was during his pseudo scientific flat earth rant. He called Neil deGrasse Tyson a fake scientist.
“Lord Jamar Proves Flat Earth To Godfrey | Offers To Debate Neil deGrasse Tyson”
“Why Lord Jamar Will NOT Be Voting For Kamala Harris”
Shut the fukk up.Just had the time to listen to him, and he’s right. I agree with him on the things he said about Kamala Emhoff. Yes, let’s start calling her that, because that is her actual name; Kamala Emhoff.
Btw, The Intercept (social democrats) was the first platform to expose her in 2015. It’s not Trump, nor ADOS (Yvette Carnell and Tone Talks). The Intercept was/is pro-social democrat, they were pro-Bernie Sander. And she was not part of the social democrats, so they made a special on her explanation what horrible things she has done (things we now all know about her).
At the time the Democratic Party had an inside dispute over who should lead the party into the future. And this how they forced Hillary Clinton down peoples throats, despite of the majority Dem voters wanting Bernie for president. Y'all probably remember the rallies against the Dems and Hillary.
The same sector of the Dems pushed Kamala Emhoff as presidential candidate, without the democratic process of voting her in. There is an agenda.
As people know, I’m from the Netherlands and don’t have voting rights in the States. I’m merely interested in the geopolitical aspects. I’m not telling anyone what and how to vote.
All the economic and social safety nets yall have over there, with your socialized medicine and education, and you’re gonna sit here and tell us that Jill Stein is our best option. My guy stay in your fukking lane. Not sure what that is, but it ain’t this. I was team Bernie in 16 and 20 but anything is better than republicans. Literally fukk offJust had the time to listen to him, and he’s right. I agree with him on the things he said about Kamala Emhoff. Yes, let’s start calling her that, because that is her actual name; Kamala Emhoff.
Btw, The Intercept (social democrats) was the first platform to expose her in 2015. It’s not Trump, nor ADOS (Yvette Carnell and Tone Talks). The Intercept was/is pro-social democrat, they were pro-Bernie Sander. And she was not part of the social democrats, so they made a special on her explanation what horrible things she has done (things we now all know about her).
At the time the Democratic Party had an inside dispute over who should lead the party into the future. And this how they forced Hillary Clinton down peoples throats, despite of the majority Dem voters wanting Bernie for president. Y'all probably remember the rallies against the Dems and Hillary.
The same sector of the Dems pushed Kamala Emhoff as presidential candidate, without the democratic process of voting her in. There is an agenda.
As people know, I’m from the Netherlands and don’t have voting rights in the States. I’m merely interested in the geopolitical aspects. I’m not telling anyone what and how to vote.
Sadat X?Damn near all of Brand Nubian going with Trump now?