I AM WARHOL
Veteran
Fultz is a better prospect than Ball. And thats taking nothing away from Ball. Ive just seen Fultz do more. I do think Ball can be special but I cant ignore the holes he has in his game in comparison to fultz
Ball usage rate isn't high.Ball doesn't go right breh, and he doesn't really get to the rim that well. More than half his shots were threes and he generally never attacked if the defense was in the paint, dude went to the line 2.7 times per game, vs Fultz getting there 6.7 times.
He didn't run much PnR either, he's a great prospect offensively Fultz is a lot more complete and in a half court game Fultz should be better short term and long term.
The data and film says your full of shytBro you just be throwin ANY random bullshyt out there huh, hoping if you put it out there in the world that maybe it will come true?
To say Ball can get to the rim and finish well is laughable. To say he's good defensively is just embarrassing. Really nothing else to say here. Watch him, or look at his numbers, dude doesn't get to the basket. More than half his shots are 3's, and more than half his buckets inside the paint are assisted.
Mid-range game will be needed because he's not gonna get the space to get his jumper off that he got in college. Can you even find me one video of him scoring off a PnR? I'm sure ONE must exist somewhere. He's trash in the PnR. He needs to be able to come off a pick and explode to the basket, or pull up for a jumper. I haven't seen him do either very often.
As far as your last point, act like UCLA didn't bring back basically their entire team from last year, not to mention another 5-star in TJ Leaf. Meanwhile Washington lost their top 3 players including two first round picks. But I'm sure that had nothing to do with the records
He played to his team's strengths but there were glaring weaknesses like his inability to shoot going to his right, that is something teams will sit on by the 2nd or 3rd week of the season. And he had a lot of trouble getting around athletic defenders.
Meanwhile, Fultz was scoring with relative ease with two bigs clogging up the lane, I think Fultz is a better passer than he showed, and with the right team he'll hit the ground running.
Bro you just be throwin ANY random bullshyt out there huh, hoping if you put it out there in the world that maybe it will come true?
To say Ball can get to the rim and finish well is laughable. To say he's good defensively is just embarrassing. Really nothing else to say here. Watch him, or look at his numbers, dude doesn't get to the basket. More than half his shots are 3's, and more than half his buckets inside the paint are assisted.
Mid-range game will be needed because he's not gonna get the space to get his jumper off that he got in college. Can you even find me one video of him scoring off a PnR? I'm sure ONE must exist somewhere. He's trash in the PnR. He needs to be able to come off a pick and explode to the basket, or pull up for a jumper. I haven't seen him do either very often.
As far as your last point, act like UCLA didn't bring back basically their entire team from last year, not to mention another 5-star in TJ Leaf. Meanwhile Washington lost their top 3 players including two first round picks. But I'm sure that had nothing to do with the records
Even D'Angelo Russell took a scrub team to the Tourney.
Ball has his faults, but he has plenty of strengths too and his "intangibles" are one of them. I think he'll have an immediate effect on whoever drafts him. Ball will definitely have to work on his pick and roll game, but he has Jason Kidd written all over him.
We're not gonna act like he's D'Angelo Russell defensively. You're also not gonna act like Fultz is some lock down defender himself. Ball has good instincts on defense and he should be more than capable on that end of the court.
Fultz took (and made) more difficult shots in college and I don't know how well that will translate to the pros, especially with his slow release.
It's not a be all end all, but college is a guard's game. Even with Romar's bum ass as coach, I think they shoulda been around .500 with him. I like Chriss...Don't base NBA potential on who gets to the tourney, Washington couldn't get there last year with Murray and Chriss, you gonna tell me Marquese Chriss doesn't have the highest ceiling of all the PFs taken in his draft? Romar was a terrible coach, he had two NBA talents on his team last year and went nowhere? This year they only had Fultz as an NBA player, we're not talking about seasoned pros, we're talking about dudes 1 year removed from HS.
It's not a be all end all, but college is a guard's game. Even with Romar's bum ass as coach, I think they shoulda been around .500 with him. I like Chriss...
Even D'Angelo Russell took a scrub team to the Tourney.
Ball has his faults, but he has plenty of strengths too and his "intangibles" are one of them. I think he'll have an immediate effect on whoever drafts him. Ball will definitely have to work on his pick and roll game, but he has Jason Kidd written all over him.
We're not gonna act like he's D'Angelo Russell defensively. You're also not gonna act like Fultz is some lock down defender himself. Ball has good instincts on defense and he should be more than capable on that end of the court.
Fultz took (and made) more difficult shots in college and I don't know how well that will translate to the pros, especially with his slow release.
Breh, they were 18-14 before the NIT with two NBA players on their team last year
This year they were 9-22 with 1 NBA player on the team, that seems about right for Romar.
Jason Kidd written all over him except he can't do several of the things that made Kidd so great (playing defense, breaking down a defense).
Lonzo is D'Angelo level defensively for sure. He's a better athlete but that's about it, his on ball D is atrocious. The only thing he can do half-decently well is play the passing lanes from time to time, but so does Russell. Ball trying to defend the PnR is embarrassingly bad.
"Intangibles" are an easy way to brush aside all the important stuff he can't do.. sounds like when a cac football player who can't run fast or jump high gets drafted... "well he's got a high motor and intangibles"
Fultz defense wasn't good. His tools is way he's rated defensivelyEven D'Angelo Russell took a scrub team to the Tourney.
Ball has his faults, but he has plenty of strengths too and his "intangibles" are one of them. I think he'll have an immediate effect on whoever drafts him. Ball will definitely have to work on his pick and roll game, but he has Jason Kidd written all over him.
We're not gonna act like he's D'Angelo Russell defensively. You're also not gonna act like Fultz is some lock down defender himself. Ball has good instincts on defense and he should be more than capable on that end of the court.
Fultz took (and made) more difficult shots in college and I don't know how well that will translate to the pros, especially with his slow release.
Kyrie and Wall went 1.
And I think you're confusing Markelle being smooth, with lack of athleticism, you can probably count on 1 hand the 6'4" guys in the league that can dunk from around the foul line.