I never said that SCIENCE said it & they still say it today. The articles stated it & the videos just echoed it.
it is not racist...it is science that has been proven
I guess ABC News Nightline is racist now too
The Ménage à Caucs DO not WANT you TO know that the BLACK MAN is NOT the product of his FAKE evolution theory. The ORIGINAL man created HIMSELF by shooting MELANIN rays at the DOUBLE BLACK pyramid next TO the face on MARS seven hundred AND seventy SEVEN times. KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE KNOWLEDGE. Clown Pride and BarfNone are JEWS. I am A righteous Muslim Allah Hebrew Indian AND IF you have a problem, you are a c00n times CAC squared. The ORIGINAL ninja turtles were BLACK. Red, purple, orange, blue? ALL MELANIFIED. No WHITE devilry. Knowledge is POWER.
what you posted was hard facts, one of the only things I see white people get mad about regarding their race. Half the pale faces that found that offensive have called somebody or said nikka i guarantee it. i find it funny and ironic what they got mad about, not the fact they feel its racist...but because the shyt you posted made perfect sense.
They can call us all types of shyt, known whiteboys on here callin us nikka on the daily..but as soon as you question their ungodly skin tone it's a problem. How many whiteboys have been banned for callin us nikkaz? Not nurr cracker.
It's cool though bruh, the thread was
It really made sense to you or youre getting your troll on...how the hell could the white man have been made in a cave 4000 years ago when theres mitochondrial DNA and fossils that say these processes happenned tens of thousands of years ago.
DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity. People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common, but no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other.
In other words, while the concept of separate human sub-species called "races" was developed four hundred years ago, during a time when white supremacists and the slave trade were seeking to justify the enslavement of Blacks, as well as the social, economic and political exaltation of whites, however, the most recent in-depth study of human DNA ever completed has shown that "race" does not exist.
A "racist" is "a person, organization or institution continuing to believe in, advocate, perpetuate or passively accept the proposition that there are separate 'races' among the human species, in spite of all of the well-known Human Genome Project evidence that separate human "races" do not exist.
The continued use of the word "race", regardless of how or why it is used, will inevitably lead to prolonged belief in the unscientific fallacy of separate "races" within the human species, with a continued reluctance to adjust to the biological, social and political ramifications of the new genomic evidence.
Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Human Genome Project Announces That "Race" Does Not Exist | NowPublic News Coverage Human Genome Project Announces That "Race" Does Not Exist | NowPublic News Coverage
Ill just leave this here
Even if some of you were discgusted by the implications of this thread... I don't see why a conversation around the evolution of skin color couldn't have happened.
Threads in other forums, and even other sites might start off talking about one thing and evolve into something better.
Why Did People Become White? | LiveScience
A host of evolutionary pressures at work that contributed to the development of lighter skin, but for now, scientists aren't sure exactly what produced white people.
Because of the fcked up way HL is ran, and controlled by groupthink; I can't even go back and see what point's dude was attempting to making.. but if I remember correctly he wasn't far off as far as timeline and causes are concerned.
We can't even discuss the genetic exception, we know as white skin, around these parts, smh.
Though once thought to have been our ancestors, the Neanderthals are now considered an evolutionary dead end.
They first appear in the fossil record hundreds of thousand of years ago and, at their peak, dominated a wide range, spanning Britain and Iberia in the west to Israel in the south and Uzbekistan in the east. Our own species, Homo sapiens, evolved in Africa, and displaced the Neanderthals after entering Europe somewhere around the 45,000-year mark.
No-one can say for sure what, if any, active role modern humans had in the decline of Europe's Neanderthals.
What is clear though is that some mixing must have occurred somewhere at some point. This is evident from DNA studies that prove Neanderthals made a small but significant contribution to the genetics of many modern humans.
However, scientists think this interbreeding could have occurred outside Europe, in the eastern Mediterranean or Middle East region (the area archaeologists call the "Levant"), and quite probably even deeper in time - some 80,000-90,000 years or so ago.
Here's the original thread for reference if you want to go back and look at anything.
http://www.the-coli.com/higher-lear...fic-proof-origins-white-man.html#.UWqWJbVOR_g
Dudes in here calling it pseudoscience are just flat out wrong.
This video is dated from 2010
Neanderthals Still Walk the Earth? | Video - ABC News
this article is from 2013
BBC News - Last-stand Neanderthals queried
Also the people of Africa may have some Neanderthal DNA but they are the only people to have less than 4% & in some cases have absolutely 0%.
As I said, I know that the subject is controversial but findings such as these still should warrant discourse. Again why was my thread locked? Is it because I used the bible to enhance science discoveries?
I expected people in here to debate the bible interpretations (i.e. the exodus, or how different the guy in the video views the bible than the standard christian) here more than anything. Not the actual science.
what do Neanderthals have to do with race?
alot actually if you guys would read the material. Neanderthal DNA has been linked to the reason why Europeans have light skin & red hair etc.
Of course its only a small change in the DNA of us humans as Sensitive Blake showed that 99% of us are exactly alike but that Neanderthal DNA is the reason for the change in skin color.
Gene evidence
Though once thought to have been our ancestors, the Neanderthals are now considered an evolutionary dead end.
They first appear in the fossil record hundreds of thousand of years ago and, at their peak, dominated a wide range, spanning Britain and Iberia in the west to Israel in the south and Uzbekistan in the east. Our own species, Homo sapiens, evolved in Africa, and displaced the Neanderthals after entering Europe somewhere around the 45,000-year mark.
No-one can say for sure what, if any, active role modern humans had in the decline of Europe's Neanderthals.
What is clear though is that some mixing must have occurred somewhere at some point. This is evident from DNA studies that prove Neanderthals made a small but significant contribution to the genetics of many modern humans.
However, scientists think this interbreeding could have occurred outside Europe, in the eastern Mediterranean or Middle East region (the area archaeologists call the "Levant"), and quite probably even deeper in time - some 80,000-90,000 years or so ago.