Undermining shouldn't be very hard. Just ask the guy if it takes deadly force to cause any of those injuries. The obvious answer is no from what he has testified to so far IMO.
Live video: George Zimmerman Trial - jury selection, trial, verdict, eye rolling
- Thread starter Mr Uncle Leroy
- Start date
Undermining shouldn't be very hard. Just ask the guy if it takes deadly force to cause any of those injuries. The obvious answer is no from what he has testified to so far IMO.
damn thats foul...so what possible scenario would GZ have to hit the stand?
DaChampIsHere
Survive the drought
True, but then the only probalem with that is that the defense will fack back on the idea that: no one can say whether or not GZ feared for his life except GZ.
Which is an obvious point for all of us, but an unprovable point.
Hopefully the jury is able to look past all that and realize the precedent of what a "not guilty" verdict would allow in this country.
the state uses the actual people that did the investigation
I don't know why theres SO MUCH confusion about how the state presents their case
Nobody is confused, the state doesn't have to call every single person that had something to do with that night if they don't want to.
So which is it, is it Dame Dummy or Dame Diddy? If it's true the gun was pressed up on TM, and there was no blood on GZ, could maybe he have shot him from the top? 
This GZ is some super soldier type cat. He able to shoot nikkaz so clean while being pummeled from the bottom no blood is drawn 
He needs to get recruited by the alphabet boys with the quickness, he'll be their most talented killer 
Yea but during closing arguments is when you argue that the decision he made was unreasonable.
thegreatwb
Pro
If the defense feels that they can't win the case, they would put George on the stand as a last resort. If he claimed Stand your ground, he would be required to testify. Since he chose to claim only self defense, he isn't required to testify.
lol CNN said the old man just completed destroyed the prosecutions whole case in a couple of hours
didnt they already establish that the law doesn't require you to actually wait for your life to be at risk before "standing your ground"?
Again we all know that, however to "stand your ground" and respond with deadly force the decision has to be reasonable considering the circumstances. Doesn't seem reasonable to me.
dam the defense team is giving the prosecution dat work
Someone said on another board that this dude testified for Phil Spector and Scott Peterson and they were both found guilty. I'm anxious to see how the prosecution deals with him.
