Religion/Spirituality Lets talk about the role of Africa in early Christianity..

[emoney]

delete

 

[emoney]

delete

 

[TheProfessor]

genetically, Ga's, Fantes, Ewes, Asantes, Dagombas cluster together tho

Cluster together genetically? What does that even mean? Ewe's are NOT genetically related to Fantes so I'm not sure what you're talking about. Ewes were, however, related to those who USED to occupy what is now Ghana TODAY.

 

[emoney]

delete

 

[TheProfessor]

we are not Sudanese nor do we descend from there?

there's no historical proof of this

despite having what might seem like cultural similarities

No proof that tribes in West Africa once resided in East Africa? Are you sure about that?

 

[emoney]

delete

 

[emoney]

No proof that tribes in West Africa once resided in East Africa? Are you sure about that?

I never said East Africa, I said Sudan specifically and was referrering to Ghanaian tribes

 

[TheProfessor]

I never said East Africa, I said Sudan specifically and was referrering to Ghanaian tribes

And what correlation does that have with what I said? I said specific tribes trace their migration back to the area known as Sudan TODAY. Which BTW, wasn't called Sudan then.

 

[Blackking]

No encyclopedia or historical record say anything about Africans colonizing Asia. That's something you are going to have to prove if it's a position that you are going to promote. quoting outdated opinions isn't proof, and I already explained why.

Indian civilization is Indian history, not African history.

There was no such thing as a place called India at first breh - what are you talking about.

NTM Everyone looked like variations of black Africans up into like 10K years ago. Indian history go back wayyy further than that and India just so happens to be one of the place that recieved the most African Migration. " encyclopedia or historical record " says that IT was one of the first settled.

According to the genetic and paleontological record, we only started to leave Africa between 60,000 and 70,000 years ago. In fact, the human population likely dropped to fewer than 10,000. We were holding on by a thread.

These early beachcombers expanded rapidly along the coast to India, and reached Southeast Asia and Australia by 50,000 years ago. The first great foray of our species beyond Africa had led us all the way across the globe. Slightly later, a little after 50,000 years ago, a second group appears to have set out on an inland trek, leaving behind the certainties of life in the tropics to head out into the Middle East and southern Central Asia. From these base camps, they were poised to colonize the northern latitudes of Asia

Around 20,000 years ago a small group of these Asian hunters headed into the face of the storm,

Just in case you're more ignorant than you're seeming - these people were still black at this time, SMH

The rise of agriculture around 10,000 years ago—and the population explosion it created—has left a dramatic impact on the human gene pool.

This is when we first started seeing Asian looking people and most of those were still darker than I am.....

What stories are waiting to be told in your own DNA?

https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/human-journey/

You will have to only count the last 4000 years to even make a weak attempt disconnect Africa from India.

The eighth incarnation of the supreme God Vishnu in Hinduism - (cough) Kishna - Means Black. ijs If we don't believe they are referring to black people for worship - we can just pay attention to what the word black meant in Ancient india - IT meant "the Attractive One" or most beautiful... or all attractive.

Most of Asia is “a blank map, if you will, in its prehistory”, says Petraglia. Scattered fossils record the archaic peoples — Homo erectus, Neanderthals and the recently identified Denisovans — who had the continent to themselves before modern humans moved in. But few artefacts and no convincing fossils record this arrival. Researchers have mostly relied on the DNA of people today to reconstruct the ancient story.

Geneticists collected mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) — which is inherited only from the mother — across much of Asia, focusing on isolated native groups thought to be descendants of early human settlers in their areas. They identified distinctive mtDNA variants, or haplotypes, and compared them to create a family tree of the African exodus.

The first group that traveled to Asia died out.... there is no genetic trace and no traces of their tools. About 75K years ago all of arabia and india turned back into a desert the nubian and other african people moved into the area that was similar to their own climate.



According to this there was a first wave that mated with the Neanderthals. Most non-africans had 1-4% Neanderthal. They mated with 'human like beings'

Below is were you come from...

A second round of human arrivals gave rise to East Asians starting between 38,000 and 25,000 years ago, Rasmussen and his colleagues propose. As in Reich’s study, most current Asian populations studied by Rasmussen’s team lack Denisovan DNA.

By the time of the second human migration into Asia, early arrivers had displaced or replaced Denisovans in Southeast Asia, Hublin suggests.

Further investigations of the genetic history of Australian aborigines will reveal much about human evolution, Hawks predicts. Unlike most people today, these hardy foragers have DNA uncluttered by the relatively recent evolutionary legacy of agricultural lifestyles.

 

[TheProfessor]

paternally they are

They aren't related to Fantes and I challenge you to show something that says otherwise.

 

[Blackking]

I deal with reality not fantasy. You should try it sometime.

You don't like when cacs claim your shyt so don't claim my shyt.

I'm not claiming "your" shyt , lol. I don't make up these facts so how can you be mad at me.

It's not = someone making 20th century movies about black people played by white actors.

 

[emoney]

And what correlation does that have with what I said? I said specific tribes trace their migration back to the area known as Sudan TODAY. Which BTW, wasn't called Sudan then.

I know it wasn't called Sudan back then
leave out the irrelevant facts
humanity originated in that region of central east africa
humanity is connected so technically the world has its roots there

 

[TheProfessor]

I know it wasn't called Sudan back then
leave out the irrelevant facts
humanity originated in that region of central east africa
humanity is connected so technically the world has its roots there

Yeah and?

 

[GetInTheTruck]

LMAO @ your sh*t. Do you have any factual proof that Africans weren't in Asia at the time? Go ahead, show it.

So who's shyt is it then? I don't any proof to say that Indian civilization is Indian. You're the one saying it was African, so the burden of proof is on you.

I sense that you're trying to move the goal posts. I don't blame you.

 

[emoney]

They aren't related to Fantes and I challenge you to show something that says otherwise.

I can. But it doesn't matter to me.

I want to focus on the origin of Sudan claim you made about SPECIFIC Ghanaian tribes

you have not shown anything to substantiate this claim