So many draft experts these days, did any of them see Donovan Mitchell being this good
Establish your core with a 6th or 7th best player on a good team, brehs.
Same thing the year before that when Rambis (he really gone
) and Fisher wasn’t giving burn to Jerian Grant and the other rookies on the bench late in a season that was lost already. These dudes aren’t letting the youth play actual games.
The motor thing is spot on. He plays kind of timid out there at times, it makes me wonder whether he lacks aggression or if he just knows his strengthens and weaknesses and plays to them, regardless he's gotta learn to give consistent effort. He's not as athletic as I hoped he be, but he's a good, fluid athlete who has good size and covers a lot of ground on defense. Has the makings of a high iq player. He has a decent floater which surprised me but doesn't have much of an offensive game. He'd be another project, he's incredibly young so there's some untapped potential there. Miles recent combine measurements bumped him ahead of Knox though imo.@Youhadasparkwhenustarted what's your take on Kevin Knox, breh?
I know one of the biggest knocks (no pun intended) against him is that he's low motor, but perhaps in the right environment & under the right tutelage the best can be brought out of him?
Thoughts?
Anyone else feel free to answer as well
Imagine adding another guy that needed years of development in order find out what their ceiling might be. They'd be callin him a bust less than 2 months into the season 
If you ain’t showing much 2 months into your nba career then you’re a bust according to coli standards
He'd be a bad fit here, then. Fans and media would never let him live. You see how they talk about Frank, even on here
I'd be more than ok taking an upside guy over a player that's more "polished"/NBA ready, but the upside guy Id prefer would be less of a boom or bust risk than a project. Use a "project" pick with the 2nd round pick we have
If you ain’t showing much 2 months into your nba career then you’re a bust according to coli standards
dunks, but they'd end up givin him the by the trade deadline of his 2nd season 
@ProlificLurker name Coli Gm names breh
s, ive given them too much attention already 
Perfectly said. Posters are hoping beyond hope Frank works out to more than a off the bench NBA journeyman. Mitchell was another star we missed on. Take the best player available like I said a few pages backI think the Knicks should go with the best player available. Drafting someone that's a good fit for our team isn't a good idea. Why? Our team sucks. We don't have a core. We have KP. Period. Frank has not showed he should be part of the long term plan. For those in love with his measurable and advanced stats....they haven't produced any wins or individual overachievement. And also the Knick FO who are around Frank everyday are not sold on him thus the 2 PGs we picked up in season and why Sexton and Young will be in play if they are available. And our 1 core piece hasn't shown much durability. Is he a true alpha? Look at his season ending injury. Like really duke, you tore your acl on THAT play? Knickas land awkwardly everyday, B. And that one wasn't even that bad
And who's our other so called core piece? THJr?
I realize the whole draft is a crap shoot and all that, but I don't want to see the organization waste another top 10 pick for the second year in a row on a player already projected to have a low ceiling. One year we shooting for a George Hill with more wingspan, than the next we looking for a PJ Tucker with a more consistent outside shot? Come on man. I'm not rolling (Joe Budden voice).
Sure take the best player available but only if he's much better than what you currently have. If a point guard is the best player available at 9 but only marginally better than Frank then that's a waste of a pick.
