Which proves that married men are better-off than single men in one aspect.
And you're supporting the online-antics of a man who has
never been married.
Would you take advice on swimming across the English Channel from someone who has never been in the deep end of the pool?
What I'd end up doing is assessing whether swimming across the English Channel has any TANGIBLE benefit through my own logical reasoning... which it doesn't, which is why I wouldn't swim across the English Channel.
Secondly, I'm not part of the 'get married brehs' movement. I'm FOR marriage in concept, but after assessing the current legal environment, being unable to find any real tangible benefits that modern women bring to the table to tether myself to her long-term, in addition to women initiating divorce at a much higher rate than men cause me to come to a position where I am critical of marrying a modern woman in an environment that punishes men in the event that the marriage doesn't work out... which obviously was a calculated move in society due to the desire for the elites to break up the family structure.
For one, the modern woman says she refuses to cook and clean for her man. Secondly, women initiate divorces at a much higher rate than men. Thirdly, women typically win out in divorce court, especially when it concerns custody of children, women win out. And now, the incentives are being lowered still with women not even giving their husband their physical prime, but instead sharing it with a plethora of men who have nothing but short-term interests in mind? And at an age where her giving birth to your child becomes increasingly more risky?
So in summation, I'm FOR marriage given that the proper incentives are there. A positive marriage is much better than being single, but ultimately, with the current prevailing attitude, the incentives to engage in such a deal are increasingly being diminished, and this is being noted by the younger generation, hence the marriage rates plummeting.