Rocket Scientist
Superstar
Link don't work well basically Reincar and Kevm was dropping truths,on y'all women.@C.Holla Here's a link to every post I made in that thread. Please tell me where I stumbled: http://www.thecoli.com/search/1097515/
Link don't work well basically Reincar and Kevm was dropping truths,on y'all women.@C.Holla Here's a link to every post I made in that thread. Please tell me where I stumbled: http://www.thecoli.com/search/1097515/
Clown working black men brehs…
Link don't work well basically Reincar and Kevm was dropping truths,on y'all women.
It worked for me when I just clicked it. Just go to the thread and type in my name…all 17 of my post will show up.
It will show that I ended up clowning Reincar because he misinterpreted stats that didn't even relate to my post, and when I found the stats that he was actually trying to infer, it only proved my point. He couldn't even respond to me again after.
After I responded to Kev, he complete ignored the post (because he didn't have a legitimate answer that didn't include straw man arguments and generalization and bunch of garbage that I wasn't even talking about) and had the audacity to quote my post in a different thread on some random bs about academic studies. When I saw that, I then called him out on not being able to respond intelligently to my post. After being called out about ignoring the post, he then responds with a bunch of straw man arguments and generalizations (which I then called him out on). He subsequently didn't have a damn thing to say.
No one on this board intimidates me or stumps me…ever
It worked for me when I just clicked it. Just go to the thread and type in my name…all 17 of my post will show up.
It will show that I ended up clowning Reincar because he misinterpreted stats that didn't even relate to my post, and when I found the stats that he was actually trying to infer, it only proved my point. He couldn't even respond to me again after.
After I responded to Kev, he complete ignored the post (because he didn't have a legitimate answer that didn't include straw man arguments and generalization and bunch of garbage that I wasn't even talking about) and had the audacity to quote my post in a different thread on some random bs about academic studies. When I saw that, I then called him out on not being able to respond intelligently to my post. After being called out about ignoring the post, he then responds with a bunch of straw man arguments and generalizations (which I then called him out on). He subsequently didn't have a damn thing to say.
No one on this board intimidates me or stumps me…ever
I had the most posts in that thread I won you lost. I replied and sinned all of your bs drivel.
lol@i completely ignored your post. Nah, i responded directly to it. And i quoted something about 'academic studies?' Nah, what I quoted was you saying that you have several studies that men are better off in marriages and I asked you where these studies are.
unless you made a new post in that thread, I've already responded
Having the most post doesn't equal a win. You couldn't even respond intelligently to what I said after you threw out stats that you didn't even know how to interpret. The same in this thread. You came in talking about things you don't know about. I posted a study refuting everything you had just said and your behind didn't quote me again until now.
Why don't you link to the post I didn't respond to in that thread instead of screaming
I ethered you, you're wolfpack and all the viewpoints
Why don't you link to the post I didn't respond to in that thread instead of screaming
I ethered you, you're wolfpack and all the viewpoints
The statistic is the AVERAGE AGE OF MARRIAGE not to be mistaken when how many people are actually getting married…meaning of the people who married, the average age was 27 and 29. The actual marriage rate, which speaks to the gist of my post, is 31.1 (for every 1000 unmarried women, 31 are getting married). That's pretty low if you ask me.
Again, if a woman in the 20-27 range does not find a husband, she should still be productive in life. Should she be sitting around being unproductive just because she hasn't found a husband?
That's the perception but older guys looking to married have to "settle" as well. You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise.
Older, established men don't settle...they CHOOSE. Women like older, established, mature men. Its always been like and its not changing.
This was my response after you quoted some stats (that you didn't cite) that did not even relate to my point. You didn't say a damn thing else to me after I posted this:
I didn't even see that post.
And no duh the average takes into account women who marry at 18 and old foggies in their 30s and 40s
I never said the odd women who married at a older age will be unproductive. What I said and keep on saying that the best mate a woman can find will be in her prime when she is most fertile, most attractive , the older she gets the less suitors she gets. Just like a free agent who doesn't sign the first few days of free agency he waits and the suitors with cap space dry up, will he still get signed yeah, but it won't be the best situation he could have got.