i think you're doing a bit of projection out of some feminine need to argue.
i asked you for your definitions. each man has his own definition of legacy.
a woman isn't building a legacy. she's helping a man build a legacy. most women cannot be anything besides randoms. they have no desire or will to be anything but a random. it's too much work to submit to a man, apparently.
a man building or who has built a legacy, can have multiple wives. would those multiple wives be considered randoms, or are you just running your mouth?
i asked you for your definition of a legacy. don't do so much projection, and next time understand that when someone's asking you questions, they're doing it for a specific reason.
A woman isn't building a legacy and yet the first thing you asked in that sassy, neck rolling post of yours was "what women you know in 2020 concerned about legacy"? Ok breh lol
Now, I'm married with kids, so I ain't looking. But I met plenty. The real question is, why are you worried about what women are concerned with? Are
you as a man concerned with building a legacy or not? Your goals should not be dependent on women.
And you asked why would a man only want one woman if he had his shyt together, and I gave you the answer. Legacy.
However, if a man doesn't want that type of legacy, who the fukk is compelling him? No one. No need to start rambling about situations like multiple wives that are not applicable to most brehs who live in a first and 2nd world countries and aren't incestuous cacs in Utah.
I already know your line of reasoning for your questions. Its the same as anyone else who rattles off a bunch of questions back after being asked a simple question themselves. A deflection tactic. You didn't say whether your pops was in the household, but I know what most would guess by your response. The fact that you think how you grew up and what you saw has nothing to do with how you view family and legacy now says everything. Don't be afraid to get therapy breh, and I mean that.