Kawhi Leonard wants OUT from the Spurs.

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
80,323
Reputation
24,562
Daps
363,544
This is a silly post because the Spurs are trying to trade an asset that is losing value rapidly in the sense that his club control is evaporating with each day once the season starts, so SA is going to have to take some garbage to get the players that they want in any trade.

EDIT: Or they can take fifty cents on the dollar from a team in the East, or they can just sit on Kawhi for a half-year or the full year, but if they want to get some sort of foundational return, they're not getting that without caveats.
If you're the lakers and you know you're gonna get Kawhi next summer anyway, why the fukk would you consider even giving up Ingram?
You guys don't make any goddamn sense

:heh:
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,522
Reputation
8,694
Daps
202,700
Reppin
NULL
Lowkey i wanna see pop and rc not trade him and make him play. All the excuses in the book he and his group would try and pull gonna make him look like the ultimate bytch:russ:


I wanna see the comedy
I'd be interested to see if the media would turn on him, they'd have to at that point.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,586
Reputation
1,164
Daps
19,180
If you're the lakers and you know you're gonna get Kawhi next summer anyway, why the fukk would you consider even giving up Ingram?
You guys don't make any goddamn sense

:heh:

Did you even comprehend the original post? Because now you have LeBron, and you don't want to waste LeBron's age 33/34 season because you want to hoard young players.

The second they signed LeBron, they went into win-now mode. As in, to win the West, they need Kawhi NOW, not in 2019.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
102,842
Reputation
5,074
Daps
205,194
Reppin
NULL
If you're the lakers and you know you're gonna get Kawhi next summer anyway, why the fukk would you consider even giving up Ingram?
You guys don't make any goddamn sense

:heh:
Bron didn’t come to la to tank for a year

Lakers management still doesn’t realize Bron is in control now
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
80,323
Reputation
24,562
Daps
363,544
Did you even comprehend the original post? Because now you have LeBron, and you don't want to waste LeBron's age 33/34 season because you want to hoard young players.

The second they signed LeBron, they went into win-now mode. As in, to win the West, they need Kawhi NOW, not in 2019.
So if you need Kawhi NOW...why are you playing hardball trying to use Deng's contract?
It doesn't make any sense.
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
80,323
Reputation
24,562
Daps
363,544
How are you arguing that the Lakers are in "win now" mode...then also claiming that the Lakers have the leverage to wait out Kawhi?
The shyt can't be both.

So again...yall really out here trying to claim the Lakers are dying to give up Ingram to the Spurs out of the goodness of their hearts?

:skip:
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,586
Reputation
1,164
Daps
19,180
So if you need Kawhi NOW...why are you playing hardball trying to use Deng's contract?
It doesn't make any sense.

:snoop:

It's not playing hardball to try and offload a bad contract when dealing multiple players that can make up a young core for a top-eight, top-ten superstar, bruh. C'mon.

It's amazing how many people still have the "wait it out" mode like wasting one of the two, maybe three high-level years LeBron has left is cool, fukk it, why not. Thinking like that is dumb as hell.
 

Suleiman Bey

Banned
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
5,610
Reputation
-4,585
Daps
11,186
dont apply common sense to buisness brehs
You think Ingram , Kuzma and Ball will be "superstars"? If not it's a bad deal regardless. Sometimes nothing is better than something. This is one of those cases. I don't see Ball or Ingram ever being great and obviously neither do the lakers if they trying to shop them for a "gimp"
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
80,323
Reputation
24,562
Daps
363,544
:snoop:

It's not playing hardball to try and offload a bad contract when dealing multiple players that can make up a young core for a top-eight, top-ten superstar, bruh. C'mon.

It's amazing how many people still have the "wait it out" mode like wasting one of the two, maybe three high-level years LeBron has left is cool, fukk it, why not. Thinking like that is dumb as hell.
What are you talking about?
You think asking the Spurs to take on a horrible contract and give up a superstar to a conference rival isn't hard ball?

:heh:
 
Top