Kanye West Is Now Going In On The Jewish Community Right Now

[tuckgod]

If you need examples of Kanye's self hate at this point then you cant be helped..sorry breh.

Or you have no real answers

 

[tuckgod]

Why do some Black ppl want to be Jewish so bad??? Very strange

No “black people” want to be Jew-ish.

That’s kind of a Jew, but not really.

 

[Detroit Wave]

Why do some Black ppl want to be Jewish so bad??? Very strange

Go ask some hebrew israelites

 

[OneManGang]

Did anyone mention it’s actually DEFCON not death con lol

 

[Danie84]

KKKanye had a platform to spew his anti-blackness for years, but not now

 

[Instant Classic]

Always find it interesting on these platforms how swiftly they ban for antisemitic posts, but look the other way if you post anti-black things.

 

[Ain't That Something]

Always find it interesting on these platforms how swiftly they ban for antisemitic posts, but look the other way if you post anti-black things.

This is what happens when you have no real power in the World. The Jewish people have real power and can shut down foolishness against them and we can't. It's really simple

 

[Indigo-1]

Black people are literally the bridge other groups use to build their community off of and can make or break elections to the point pandering to us, but we have no real power . This non-black Meat riding is staggering


Many Jews still get reparations (billions worth) from their tragedy, especially from the US. They like many groups have power because they have sponsors. Black people have no sponsors and still manage to be relevant. We have REAL power, we just need to direct it inward instead of carrying and letting others slide.

 

[Instant Classic]

This is what happens when you have no real power in the World. The Jewish people have real power and can shut down foolishness against them and we can't. It's really simple

True, we had the opportunity to take over the music industry during Motown era, but from what I remember didn't have access to funds to compete with Jewish entrepreneurs. It's just a shame that creators really got short end of the stick and don't hold real power to shutdown antiblackness in the entertainment industry

 

[Genos]

Who said prove a negative? I simply said how do you know they were not jews? You are the one who decided to make a declarative statement. You could have simply answered like I did and said you didn't know. But if you are gonna make a claim that black Americans aren't jews then it's on you to at least provide some evidence. You can't make claims and then run behind argument techniques.

Breh I'm doing basic logic, it's not techniques. I'll help you out, there is no proof that black Americans are jews from Africa.

See in the last century there was a discovery of a molecule that exists in any living organism, its called DNA. This DNA molecule keeps part of its genetic code every time it's passed down and if you look at the code you will be able to see similarities of code in different organisms in "earlier sequences" to trace when these separate organisms have common ancestors. In humans you can do that and can see genetic code that shows up in one group of people in another group of people meaning these 2 groups of people share some sort of ancestry.

So when you look at the code for black Americans and Jewish people, black Americans don't have the same code that is distinguishes jews from other groups of people. Now there are Africans who do share that code and have been proven to be jews, but those are not black Americans.

I apologize, I thought you knew about dna and how it worked but since you're a Bible believer I should've known you were anti science.

 

[Genos]

You can’t prove anyone are “Jews” except by using the text that says there will be certain identifiers on “Jews” in the latter days(I.e. the Bible). Loaded question

jew have genetic markers that are exclusive to people with Jewish ancestry. But you're a Bible believer so science is out of your wheelhouse

 

[voltronblack]

True, we had the opportunity to take over the music industry during Motown era, but from what I remember didn't have access to funds to compete with Jewish entrepreneurs. It's just a shame that creators really got short end of the stick and don't hold real power to shutdown antiblackness in the entertainment industry

The Banks are still very much

How Banks Are Defending Their Right to Discriminate

Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB is the latest battle in Wall Street’s long war to destroy the consumer protection agency.

prospect.org

On May 25, 2020, police officer Derek Chauvin murdered Minnesota resident George Floyd on video. Nationwide demonstrations sparked what may have been the largest protest movement in American history and a global movement against racist policing. Less than a week after Floyd’s death, Wall Street CEOs told CNBC that they would fight systemic racism at their own firms.


JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said Floyd’s murder “strengthens our resolve to do more as individuals, as a firm, and in our communities.” Wells Fargo’s Charlie Scharf said, “Our company will do all we can to support our diverse communities.” Chief executives at Goldman Sachs and Bank of America echoed the comments.


Each of these men pledged to fight racism within their own banks. And all of their firms are members of trade groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Bankers Association, and the Consumer Bankers Association, which last week jointly sued in federal court to defend their members’ rights to discriminate—often along racial lines.


Chamber of Commerce v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is the latest battle in Wall Street’s long legal war to destroy the CFPB, the government’s watchdog against cheap tricks and consumer abuses in lending. The slew of trade groups bringing the case say the CFPB was wildly out of line when, in March, the agency decided to take it as a given that discrimination is an “unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice” (UDAAP). Now, the bank representatives are using the lawsuit as an opportunity to claim the CFPB itself is unconstitutional and should be defunded.


Read more from the Revolving Door Project


To any normal person, the idea that discrimination might not be “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” is ridiculous. But corporate lawyers have built a case based on the CFPB’s decision to update its examination manual—the guide for CFPB employees on firm oversight—to include discriminatory lending practices like redlining or denying loans to creditworthy marginalized people. The CFPB said it could take action here because consumers are protected against UDAAP under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act. The CFPB claims that discrimination falls under one or all of those adjectives.


But the CFPB did not go through a formal rulemaking process to alert the world it was planning to start examining for discrimination. In a blog post accompanying the update, the CFPB just said it would “continue to scrutinize” these practices, implying that it has been examining for discriminatory conduct for some time already.


A formal rulemaking would have been more time-consuming. The CFPB instead took it as self-evident that denying someone credit due to bigotry is “unfair, deceptive, or abusive,” and appended the words “including discrimination” to their normal UDAAP instructions in the examination manual.


That move, banking trade groups now allege, was “arbitrary and capricious.” Tragically, they contend, it leaves banks with “no choice but to update their UDAAP compliance policies and programs, at significant cost.”

It doesn’t take much work to find Jim Crow–era legal thinking in the Chamber of Commerce’s reasoning.

To be clear: The harm alleged is that banks will have to spend money and time ensuring they aren’t being discriminatory. They should have been doing that anyway, and it is what they would end up having to do if the CFPB had gone through a rulemaking.


The trade groups insist that they don’t want member banks to have bigoted practices either, but say they “cannot stand by while a federal agency exceeds its statutory authority, creates regulatory uncertainty, and imposes costly burdens.” Nobody wants racist outcomes, you see, but this case is about something far more important than whether people are denied loans. That something is dull administrative procedure.


Using pedantic legal minutiae to justify discrimination should sound familiar to anyone who has studied American racism in the neoliberal era. Historian Nancy MacLean documents in Democracy in Chains how James Buchanan, a public choice theory economist, invented a way of continuing de facto school segregation by separating students along class lines instead of explicit race lines. Economist Milton Friedman worked with open segregationists to try to achieve this, no matter what The Wall Street Journal falsely claims. Former Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater claimed he didn’t personally support segregation, he just thought the all-white electorates of the Jim Crow states should decide for themselves whether to end their laws. Conservative intellectuals at National Review argued that integration and segregation laws were equally bad, since, they believed, racial justice was secondary to limited government.

 

[EBK String]

On Instagram
Instagram is owned by Facebook
Facebook is owned by Mark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg is Jewish.

Ofcourse he ain't gonna allow that shyt on his platform.


Imagine if Black folks owned these big and powerful social media apps and platforms...then we could stomp out anti-blackness on them asap. It all comes down to who owns and controls those outlets.

The coli is black owned and is full of cacs pretending to be black and c00ning

 

[levitate]

Mods, please ban from this thread the folks arguing over ancient Egypt and shyt.

Take that shyt to another thread. Writing whole ass novels and shyt.

@Houston911

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

Mods, please ban from this thread the folks arguing over ancient Egypt and shyt.

Take that shyt to another thread. Writing whole ass novels and shyt.

@Houston911