What I mean is that it's strange that he got the job in the first place, the movie is was ok-good. Think about it for a sec. His only feature film is from 2005, a box office bomb and was continuation of a one season sci-fi show and since then he has directed 3 ep. of Dollhouse, 2 ep. of The Office and a Glee show. It kinda obvious he got the job because of his geek status and I don't think that's reaching. But at the end of the day it's about making money and for a studio to give $220 millions to a man that has created 4 tv shows none of which have been in the top 100 most watched shows in the US and a movie that made no money is weird.
But did really well so, whatever. Would really call it critically successful, at least not in the terms of money it made. 8,3 on imdb and 69 on metacritic.
Breh, stop with your nonsense already. It was critically acclaimed.
The review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes reported a 92% approval rating with an average rating of 8/10, based on an aggregation of 290 reviews. It offers the consensus: "With a script that never forgets its heroes' humanity and no shortage of superpowered set pieces, The Avengers lives up to its hypeand raises the bar for Marvel at the movies." On Metacritic, the film achieved an average score of 69 out of 100 based on 43 reviews, signifying "generally favorable reviews".CinemaScore reported that audiences gave the film a rare A+ grade.