I was thinking the same thing."The boy"
I see what's happening in this courtroom.
CrazzyyThere's no video of Majors hitting her but you accepted her word. Now that the taxi driver is saying it was her hitting him, your dumb ass needs a video to corroborate?
There's no video of Majors hitting her but you accepted her word. Now that the taxi driver is saying it was her hitting him, your dumb ass needs a video to corroborate?
He’s speaking through an interpreter. “boy” probably doesn’t hold the same connotation in his language."The boy"
I see what's happening in this courtroom.
Prosecutors also claim in court papers that while Majors’ legal team has told the press that “video of the incident existed,” there is no video of the alleged attack. Similarly, prosecutors have claimed that Majors’ lawyers provided them a witness statement from the driver of the taxi cab in which the driver supposedly claimed he had seen the woman attack Majors. However, prosecutors claim when they showed the statement to the driver, he stated that he “had never written it, approved it, did not previously know it existed, and that the above statements were all false,” according to the motion.
The taxi/Uber didn't have a camera recording?
Come on man.. it's a criminal case...not a coli thread
There's no video of Majors hitting her but you accepted her word. Now that the taxi driver is saying it was her hitting him, your dumb ass needs a video to corroborate?
And there’s video of the incident cause now they are claiming she got injured when he “threw” her back in the car but that’s on tape and been described as more of a mild push to get her off of him.Remember when prosecutors claimed Majors' lawyer lied about the driver's witness statement?
from this Rolling Stone article:
Jonathan Majors Domestic-Violence Case Now Involves London Police
The Jonathan Majors domestic violence case now involves police in London, according to an explosive new motion filed by New York prosecutors.www.rollingstone.com
. Driver got on the stand and confirmed what the defense team said and got these prosecutors looking silly. SMH @ anybody that believed anything in them Rolling Stone articles. They was either making up shyt or the DA's office was using them to feed the public false narratives on purpose.
Shut up you fukking fakkit my god you the bussy lordCome on man.. it's a criminal case...not a coli thread
I been told y'all c00ns
Straight Nollywood roles from here on out
Yes I am aware but you don’t think those messages will influence the jurors? Of course they will much like public perception has heavily swung one way since the revelation of the text messages. Of course jurors are not meant to be influenced by things like this. If it remained sealed and based on everything the prosecution team put forward he had a good chance prior.