it's wild. Dude said he was obviously guilty.Some of these cats are emotional and think their emotionally driven opinions are fact.
Is the new defense "OK he beat her that time, but we're talking about this time though"?
"Why y'all bringing up old shyt"
again, the texts that people are referencing are heavily redacted and lack context. We don't know what that incident could have been. This is why it's important to read behind the sensationalism.
So far out of any of the people i'm following on twitter or any of the articles, nobody has flat out stated that in court it was stated that he hit her based on those texts. The prosecution whole gameplan is attacking his character by alluding to vague shyt like redacted texts.
I don't know why i even entertain yall headline reactors.
edit: also, what sense would it make for him to tell her not to call the police, but he ended up calling the police?
Two seasoned defense lawyers takes aren't matching up with Coli prosecutors Majors guilty accusations. Media bias is heavy but won't affect trial outcome.
The texts are not redacted - where are you getting that from?
They barely have a case so are trying to scrutinize his name with out of context events that have NOTHING to do with what THIS trial is about
Two seasoned defense lawyers takes aren't matching up with Coli prosecutors Majors guilty accusations. Media bias is heavy but won't affect trial outcome.
Two seasoned defense lawyers takes aren't matching up with Coli prosecutors Majors guilty accusations. Media bias is heavy but won't affect trial outcome.
As per usual, people resort to thinking this is about people being "Majors Supporters". And nothing to do with any facts. The texts are heavily redacted and lack any context.this lady is an idiot but I’m not surprised Major supporters are clinging to any and everything instead of just cutting him loose.
Anyway, they are not one-sided the judge read his and her texts.
She literally says they could be because she knows they are!
The parts that were redacted were unrelated but obviously not all of them were so the texts are related. If I request your text messages I am going to redact shyt about your mom or your grocery store order - shyt like that.
Funny she ignores your first response to herAs per usual, people resort to thinking this is about people being "Majors Supporters". And nothing to do with any facts. The texts are heavily redacted and lack any context.
but cook tho.
What? His telling her to lie and not go to the hospital after a previous incident is definitely relevant to this case.
He is a manipulator whether she is an innocent snowflake is irrelevant. He wanted to control his public image despite getting into wild and crazy fights with his girlfriend. Breaking her shyt and tossing the apartment because she went out with friends is not normal behavior under any circumstance.
This is why he called the police he wanted to control the narrative. The judge will likely allow prosecutors to admit the September 2022 police report and it will likely show he called the police then too. It doesn’t mean he didn’t hit her.
As per usual, people resort to thinking this is about people being "Majors Supporters". And nothing to do with any facts. The texts are heavily redacted and lack any context.
but cook tho.