Joe Manchin: I won’t vote for For The People Act or Weaken/Eliminate Filibuster!

Is the Democrats’ legislative agenda finished in the Biden era?


  • Total voters
    61

Micky Mikey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
15,628
Reputation
2,767
Daps
86,867
I had to take a break from politics for my mental. I slipped up and read the headline about this clown yesterday. Honestly democracy in this country is finished. Its time to admit that the Republican party is winning the long game. Democrats are too fragmented, too weak and too naive to defend American democracy from Republicans. History will not judge Manchin and Sinema lightly. And Biden's presidency is just temporary relief before this country goes full fascist. Our best hope is the changing demographics leaning more to the left.
 

The axe murderer

For I am death and I ride on a pale horse
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
40,311
Reputation
6,138
Daps
137,910
My god this forum is already reverting back to "b b but would you rather Trump" esque excuses for shytty behavior in record time.
Lol I was told not to worry about Manchin. All the smart HL Dems know so much more than us lowly progressives. He’s gonna fall right in line they say.

Pathetic
A whole lot of cap that was :hhh:
 

Jesus H. Christ

I died for your sins
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
16,506
Reputation
3,846
Daps
59,764
Folks are focused on Joe Manchin and Sinema being the baddy not realizing they are deliberate foils for parts of the democratic party. They supposedly have many democrats who silently support them and view them as the tip of the spear in pushing back on progressive demands.

See this
Joe Manchin: Deeply Disappointed in GOP and Prepared to Do Absolutely Nothing



It's not unreasonable to assume that Biden himself secretly believes the same. Notice how he has started to work on backtracking on certain things. Not even entertaining a 10k forgiveness for student loans anymore.

All facts. Manchin is the poster boy of the corporate democrats. Peep those Dems that voted against the $15 minimum raise.

Also, what exactly is manchin and corporate Dems against in the bill? :jbhmm: By any chance does it have to do with doing away with corporate money?:jbhmm:

This moron morning Joe from MSNBC said it was nothing more then a liberal wish list.:what::what::what:
 

The axe murderer

For I am death and I ride on a pale horse
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
40,311
Reputation
6,138
Daps
137,910
What does Manchin want? :beli: And more importantly, who the fukk does he think he is? Nobody knows what the Senator of Montana thinks or what the Senator of New Hampshire thinks, yet this muthafukka stays in the media constantly. What a trash politician. But then again, his mentor was a former KKK member and the governor of his state ran as a Democrat only to switch back to Republican when Trump came in power. He's no different than them.
''The Senate, its processes and rules, have evolved over time to make absolute power difficult while still delivering solutions to the issues facing our country"
Can anyone look and say with a straight face that this is anywhere near true? :mjtf:
 

Corny Batman

Caped Crusader
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
764
Reputation
250
Daps
2,650
Reppin
Citizens of Gotham
Here's one of the people who owns the Democratic party:



Manchin and Biden are doing exactly what they are told to do.

shyt i just went to this guy's wikipedia page. he's the guy who got mad at his girlfriend for doing onlyfans :dead:

Personal life[edit]
In July 2020, Cloobeck began dating Canadian-based OnlyFans model Stefanie Gurzanski without knowing her past as a pornographic performer and someone who poses nude for money. They dated for five months. Their relationship ended after Cloobeck discovered that she was secretly taking nude photos in his houses and selling them on OnlyFans.[17] Cloobeck sued Gurzanski on January 7 in state court, in Los Angeles, for a variety of offenses, including fraud and trespassing. On January 12, Gurzanski asked the California state court for a temporary restraining order against Cloobeck. In an affidavit she filed, she stated that, “He started telling me that I was no longer allowed to publish pictures on Onlyfans.com…I told him that I was going to keep doing my work as it is a source of income.”[18] On March 8, Cloobeck filed an amended complaint against Gurzanski,[19] alleging that she deceived him by claiming to be a “legitimate fashion model”, and that Gurzanski secretly used his private jets and mansions as backdrops for her nude OnlyFans shoots -- including while his teenage daughter was in the house. “Little did I know that while I was working in my various homes and my children were in the home and my employees, she was shooting porn in the bathrooms and putting it on OnlyFans,” Cloobeck said.[20]

Cloobeck claims he’s the “sole and exclusive” owner of the photos showing Gurzanski in skimpy bikinis and a revealing pink dress, which he says she published without his permission. Cloobeck is also seeking to be reimbursed for the more than $1.3 million worth of gifts and “experiences” he lavished on his ex — including more than 100 bikinis and pieces of lingerie that she “used as props in her … OnlyFans posts,” the suit claims.[17]

Cloobeck says he has offered to settle with Gurzanski if she returns the gifts he bought her so he can donate the proceeds to charity, take down any photos that show his property, and provide a public apology acknowledging she deceived him about her pornographic history.[26] She claims she has offered to give back all of the gifts he bought her and the things she bought for herself with his credit card, but a Cloobeck spokesperson said Cloobeck has been the one offering to settle.[19]

On April 1, Arthur Barens, Gurzanski’s lawyer, filed a motion with the court seeking sanctions against Cloobeck, in excess of $100,000, for violating the temporary restraining order. Cloobeck’s lawyer Robert Allen said Cloobeck was only communicating with Gurzanski to urge her to agree to a settlement of his lawsuit. Cloobeck’s legal team has moved for the restraining order to be quashed, claiming the court didn’t have jurisdiction over him at the time because he was in Mexico.[19]
 

Spiritual Stratocaster

Jesus is KING
Supporter
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
38,606
Reputation
7,273
Daps
149,547
There's a reason this is all playing out so publicly and getting headlines. Biden needs a fall guy to take the heat for his refusal to carry out any of the "progressive" campaign promises he borrowed from Bernie. He never intended to do any of that shyt. He has no intention of even trying. But he can't admit that, so he needs his good old buddy West Virginia Joe to put on a big performance.

That's why all these centrists are having meltdowns. They are the target audience for this show.
It makes sense :manny:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,850
Reputation
4,391
Daps
88,914
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Can you explain what is partisan about the bill other than the fact that Republicans want to restrict voting rights?
The general belief(on the right) is that several of its provisions infringe on state rights.:yeshrug:
These two parts of the bill are also contentious.
The gerrymandering is also an issue to conservatives, but there’s no ground to stand on there other than we’ll have a harder time winning.


Campaign finance reform[edit]
The bill would introduce voluntary public financing for campaigns, matching small donations at a 6:1 ratio.[9] The money would come from a new "Freedom From Influence Fund" under the U.S. Treasury, which would collect funds by charging a small fee assessed on criminal and civil fines and penalties or settlements with banks and corporations that commit corporate malfeasance.[17] It also incorporates campaign finance reform provisions from the DISCLOSE Act,[9][22] which would impose stricter limitations on foreign lobbying, require super PACs and other "dark money" organizations to disclose their donors, and restructure the Federal Election Commission to reduce partisan gridlock. The bill expresses support for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, in which the Supreme Court held that limits on independent political expenditures by corporations, labor unions, and other associations are unconstitutional.[4][23]

The bill also raises the limit the national committee of a political party can spend on a political candidate to $100,000,000.

Ethics[edit]
The bill would require the president and vice president, as well as presidential and vice-presidential candidates, to publicly disclose their previous ten years of income tax returns. The bill would also eliminate the use of taxpayer money by members of Congress to settle employment discrimination claims, by requiring members of Congress to reimburse the Treasuryfor any such payments.[2][4][23][17][a] Another part of the bill would require the Judicial Conference to establish rules of ethics binding on the Supreme Court of the United States, the only court in the U.S. without a binding canon of judicial ethics.[17][2][4]

The legislation would also set new disclosure rules and limitations on presidential inaugural committees.[19] Inaugural committees would be barred from taking money from corporations; a contribution limit to inaugural committees of $50,000 per person would be imposed (under current law, there is no limit); contributions of more than $1,000 would have to be disclosed within one day; and the use of funds donated to inaugural committees would be restricted only to use for inaugural events and for charitable contributions.[17]
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
23,852
Reputation
3,610
Daps
108,409
Reppin
דעת
There's a reason this is all playing out so publicly and getting headlines. Biden needs a fall guy to take the heat for his refusal to carry out any of the "progressive" campaign promises he borrowed from Bernie. He never intended to do any of that shyt. He has no intention of even trying. But he can't admit that, so he needs his good old buddy West Virginia Joe to put on a big performance.

That's why all these centrists are having meltdowns. They are the target audience for this show.
Centrist are having a meltdown because moderate Joe Biden can't pass "progressive" policies because of moderate Joe Manchin?

Are you serious with this?
 
Top