Joe Biden says Latinos are the nations future

[porque]

man don't no body like Black people

if Haitians took over the country even they wouldnt like American blacks

hell Black people dont even like each other

 

[El Bombi]

man don't no body like Black people

if Haitians took over the country even they wouldnt like American blacks

hell Black people dont even like each other

Why, when black people as a whole never harmed anyone.

 

[sfgiants]

If that the case, then why didn't we see any Mexican American organization speak up against his remarks?

But we see Al Shapton and Jessie protesting for Mexican Americans cause.

because what he said was a non issue to mexican americans...
do y'all really think mexican hicks from jalisco are the same/think the same as mark sanchez?

you think mark sanchez sits at his crib thinking "fukkin black people are lazy as hell man they aint doin the jobs i would do"
mark sanchez is thinking about the same sht any other american thinks about.
or insert any other mexican american in his place.. eva longoria, AC Slater, selena gomez, tony romo who is fukkin mexican as well but nobody knows... none of these bisexuals is trippin off some black vs mexican sht. thats some hick sht.

 

[Topps]

because what he said was a non issue to mexican americans...
do y'all really think mexican hicks from jalisco are the same/think the same as mark sanchez?

you think mark sanchez sits at his crib thinking "fukkin black people are lazy as hell man they aint doin the jobs i would do"
mark sanchez is thinking about the same sht any other american thinks about.
or insert any other mexican american in his place.. eva longoria, AC Slater, selena gomez, tony romo who is fukkin mexican as well but nobody knows... none of these bisexuals is trippin off some black vs mexican sht. thats some hick sht.

You just proved theworldismine13 point again.

 

[sfgiants]

You just proved theworldismine13 point again.

i proved his point by saying a mexican president does not represent mexican americans, aka the people who are eligible to become the policy makers and leaders in the U.S

yea, i follow you

 

[theworldismine13]

i proved his point by saying a mexican president does not represent mexican americans, aka the people who are eligible to become the policy makers and leaders in the U.S

yea, i follow you

i dont know what you think i was saying, what i was saying is that mexican (and latin american in general) culture is just as racist as american culture

i wasnt predicting or encouraging any type of race war or animosity, i was just pointing out an issue that black people need to be aware before they start celebrating the "latino future", which is the racism in latin america culture which is just as deep and has the same origins as racism in north america

for the record i think we should have racial harmony in america and everybody should get along with everybody, at the end of the day everybody has to be an american first

 

[sfgiants]

i dont know what you think i was saying, what i was saying is that mexican (and latin american in general) culture is just as racist as american culture

i wasnt predicting or encouraging any type of race war or animosity, i was just pointing out an issue that black people need to be aware before they start celebrating the "latino future", which is the racism in latin america culture which is just as deep and has the same origins as racism in north america

for the record i think we should have racial harmony in america and everybody should get along with everybody, at the end of the day everybody has to be an american first

so i show u clear examples of mexican culture in particular supporting AFRO MEX and FULL INDIGENOUS presidents as early as 1829, something that in america would be as impossible in that same time frame as time travel, but latin american culture (which is not all the same) in general is "just as racist"
?

explain to me the similarities between mexican, costa rican and paraguayan cultures... and how they are all equally racist to american culture.

none of these countries has ever had institutionalized racism the way the u.s has.. how is that not clear.

white supremacy is a new invention, mothafukkers were killing each other in europe. there was no "we are the superior race" bullshyt before, just look at england, those ugly mothafukkers have been killing each other forever.

 

[Topps]

so i show u clear examples of mexican culture in particular supporting AFRO MEX and FULL INDIGENOUS presidents as early as 1829, something that in america would be as impossible in that same time frame as time travel, but latin american culture (which is not all the same) in general is "just as racist"
?

explain to me the similarities between mexican, costa rican and paraguayan cultures... and how they are all equally racist to american culture.

none of these countries has ever had institutionalized racism the way the u.s has.. how is that not clear.

white supremacy is a new invention, mothafukkers were killing each other in europe. there was no "we are the superior race" bullshyt before, just look at england, those ugly mothafukkers have been killing each other forever.

Have Mexico had an INDIGENOUS president since 1829?

That was 183 years ago. What other INDIGENOUS people have held high office in Mexico outside of that one guy?

USA have many blacks that have held high government position, compared to Mexico one that was 183 years ago.

 

[theworldismine13]

Double post

 

[theworldismine13]

so i show u clear examples of mexican culture in particular supporting AFRO MEX and FULL INDIGENOUS presidents as early as 1829, something that in america would be as impossible in that same time frame as time travel, but latin american culture (which is not all the same) in general is "just as racist"
?

explain to me the similarities between mexican, costa rican and paraguayan cultures... and how they are all equally racist to american culture.

none of these countries has ever had institutionalized racism the way the u.s has.. how is that not clear.

white supremacy is a new invention, mothafukkers were killing each other in europe. there was no "we are the superior race" bullshyt before, just look at england, those ugly mothafukkers have been killing each other forever.

Your argument isn't anymore valid than a white American using Obama as a evidence of no racism in the us, the way you tell the existence of racism is how money and power is distributed among the groups and just about every country in the Western Hemisphere has a power structure where whites have the money and power and blacks and indigenous people at the bottom, the pattern exists in Paraguay, Mexico and Costa Rica

And as I explained before you don't need to have actual laws to have institutional racism, Instituational racism can and does exist de facto and ex facto that is why you can go to a bunch of countries and see the same racial breakdown of money and power even if they don't have explicit Jim Crow laws

And another point as I mentioned before, using the standard (which consists of tokens and lack of explicit racial laws) that you are using in 2012 the united states is less racist than Mexico and doesn't have any institutional racism

And btw here is a paper breaking down how people in latin America try to deny the racism in the region, its basically an exposal on your posting in this thread http://www.utexas.edu/law/centers/humanrights/events/adjudicating/papers/Deniallastversion.pdf

 

[theworldismine13]

http://www.utexas.edu/law/centers/humanrights/events/adjudicating/papers/Deniallastversion.pdf

One form of legalistic argument is to maintain that racial discrimination is non-existent in
Latin America because the laws in the countries of the region do not establish rules of
segregation or apartheid as is the case in other parts of the world. The claim is thus put
forth that "never in history has any legal text been in effect that establishes racial
discrimination even in a veiled way."

The implication of this statement is that discrimination can only exist when it is established by law, and not when sectors of the
population are discriminated against by deed or when laws are applied or enforced in a discriminatory way.

One of the most common ways of attempting to justify the racial situation in Latin America is to compare the region to other countries of the world. Four countries, South Africa, the United States, Rwanda or Bosnia, are old standbys that are often used for such comparisons. With regard to each instance, respectively, Latin Americans state, “we never had apartheid in our region”; “nor was there ever any legalized racial segregation”;
and “we never had racially motivated, violent armed conflicts.”

In the report submitted by a government to the CERD, the only time the words xenophobia, racism or racial discrimination are mentioned, is to refer to the plight of nationals from that country living in the United States.Discrimination always takes place on the other side of the borders.

The intellectual and political elite, in many ways, has made the United States the
paragon of racial hatred against which all other societies must be measured. The specious
claim goes something like this: since the segregationist laws and practices of the country to
the north have not been applied in Latin America, there is no need to look at other forms of
racial exclusion and alienation.

 

[kingdizzy01]

Bad News
I have friends from college that told me the same.

Black people have no idea about Mecha, Aztlan, La Raza and other pro-Latino (Mexican) organizations. This is a large part of Mexican-American ideology and upbringing. Mottos like "For our race everything, for everyone else nothing" They want to reclaim the Southwest back for Mexico and do it through immigration, mostly illegal to increase population, then through politics. If you don't believe me, look it up.

the paranoia, the love, damn...i couldnt imagine seeing this type of shyt in 2013,

its not hispanics yall should be worried about, the annunaki are still coming

ol' they took our jobs ass mufukka

i dont see anyone buggin out about arabs murdering blacks in africa, so why do we give 3 fukks what goes on in latin america? who's the puppet master orchestrating all this nonsense? like we cant see whats being done here...

the south will rise again! fight the power!

 

[Prince Akeem]

Cosign at the bolded.




Damn near every latina female I've met has told me that her father doesn't like black men and would disown her if she dated one.




Hispanic dudes be having alotta animosity in their hearts towards black dudes in my experiences.

Because we trying to fukk them Spanish mamis.

 

[AAKing23]

Because we trying to fukk them Spanish mamis.

true that

 

[theworldismine13]

the paranoia, the love, damn...i couldnt imagine seeing this type of shyt in 2013,

its not hispanics yall should be worried about, the annunaki are still coming

ol' they took our jobs ass mufukka

i dont see anyone buggin out about arabs murdering blacks in africa, so why do we give 3 fukks what goes on in latin america? who's the puppet master orchestrating all this nonsense? like we cant see whats being done here...

the south will rise again! fight the power!

actually I give a fuk about Muslims killing blacks in Africa, I've made a bunch of threads about it, check my record

And speaking of Islam it's important to keep everything in perspective so we don't keep repeating the same mistakes.

This notion that the only really racist people in this planet are white people has lead us down mistaken paths, In the 1960's till now black people have been embracing an Arab religion and part of the motivation is that Islam is not a white religion and the logic goes since they are not white they can't possibly be as racist as white people, but it turns out when you read the history of Arabs and Islam in Africa, that history is just as awful and racist as European history

And the same thing happened with communism which I posted a thread about, in the early 1900s a lot if black people embraced communism off the fact that communism and the russians were opposed to white America

And that same type of defensive logic is at play here, becuase Latinos are pissing of white Americans, a lot of black just assume that an influx of non white people and bilingualism is a good thing and ignore the very racist history of Latin America

That type of logic will be as effective as embracing Islam and communism, it's a defensive logic that has to be abandoned, we already know where that path leads to, nowhere, we need an offensive strategy that is about black people taking over America, any other type of logic is bullshyt IMO

But for the record I'm not talking about a race war, I'm just talking about how to analyze things, in the end everybody within the geographic boundaries of america has to get along with each other and everybody should follow the laws and regulations of the us