A rabbi?now the NOI is illogical.......
i posted other sources on this besides David Duke so what have you say about the Rabbi's book or is that BS too?
A rabbi about historical truthYou guys got me dying here:babyhaha:
Jewish involvement on the transatlantic slave trade
- Thread starter Blessup
- Start date
A rabbi about historical truthYou guys got me dying here:babyhaha:
Digga38
The seperation between what's fake and what's real
A rabbi?
A rabbi studies Judaism...why wouldnt they know jewish history?
That's even stupider. Of course the Jews were in the slave trade. My point is that Europeans AS A WHOLE, especially Catholics and Protestants controlled and profited from mercantile/commercial capitalism, which was the slave trade and when the slave trade was legally banned in 1808, the majority of the ones breaking the laws and shipping illegally were Protestants. And who profited the most from argiculutral capitalism and the King cotton???? Catholics and protestants.
So my point is that all groups are culpable for white supremacy. Let's hear your retort from your "rabbi" source :mcmahon:
Digga38
The seperation between what's fake and what's real
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7c0f5014-628c-11de-b1c9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3Yc5QJhX3
Two of the biggest names in the City of London had previously undisclosed links to slavery in the British colonies, documents seen by the Financial Times have revealed.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the banking family’s 19th-century patriarch, and James William Freshfield, founder of Freshfields, the top City law firm, benefited financially from slavery, records from the National Archives show, even though both have often been portrayed as opponents of slavery.
High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7c0f5014-628c-11de-b1c9-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz3Yc5tT18V
In the case of Mr Rothschild, the documents reveal for the first time that he made personal gains by using slaves as collateral in banking dealings with a slave owner.
This will surprise those familiar with his role in organising the loan that funded the UK government’s bail-out of British slave owners when colonial slavery was abolished in the 1830s. It was the biggest bail-out of an industry as a percentage of annual government expenditure – dwarfing last year’s rescue of the banking sector.
Two of the biggest names in the City of London had previously undisclosed links to slavery in the British colonies, documents seen by the Financial Times have revealed.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the banking family’s 19th-century patriarch, and James William Freshfield, founder of Freshfields, the top City law firm, benefited financially from slavery, records from the National Archives show, even though both have often been portrayed as opponents of slavery.
High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7c0f5014-628c-11de-b1c9-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz3Yc5tT18V
In the case of Mr Rothschild, the documents reveal for the first time that he made personal gains by using slaves as collateral in banking dealings with a slave owner.
This will surprise those familiar with his role in organising the loan that funded the UK government’s bail-out of British slave owners when colonial slavery was abolished in the 1830s. It was the biggest bail-out of an industry as a percentage of annual government expenditure – dwarfing last year’s rescue of the banking sector.
Since I had to delete your post for using racist language, I'll warn you here that any derogatory language about any racial group will get you banned. You don't like it, don't post here. Its simple as that.
And thanks for avoiding your obvious historical fallacies in your argument. You Jew conspiracy nuts are all the same. Go make a youtube video
Digga38
The seperation between what's fake and what's real
what slur was it? I didnt use a slurSince I had to delete your post for using racist language, I'll warn you here that any derogatory language about any racial group will get you banned. You don't like it, don't post here. Its simple as that.
And thanks for avoiding your obvious historical fallacies in your argument. You Jew conspiracy nuts are all the same. Go make a youtube video
or can i use the word gentile? is that ok
Digga38
The seperation between what's fake and what's real
I didnt start the thread but it seems strange you mods come in with your capes out everytime.....Since I had to delete your post for using racist language, I'll warn you here that any derogatory language about any racial group will get you banned. You don't like it, don't post here. Its simple as that.
And thanks for avoiding your obvious historical fallacies in your argument. You Jew conspiracy nuts are all the same. Go make a youtube video
why are muslims able to be disrespected ?
Yea, play stupid. You're a coward and can't even admit what you did. Atleast be a man and not a p*ssy breh.
Where are Muslims being called derogatory names on this forum? Use the report button right now with the post and send it to me. Simple as that.
And who is caping? That's how I know you didn't read my post; Jew conspiracy nuts and illuminati nuts are the worst because ya'll can't have a logical conversation.
Digga38
The seperation between what's fake and what's real
the thread was about jewish involvement....i was contributing to the thread if you want to talk about catholic and protestant involvment why not make your own threadI'm waiting for you to answer my post
Digga38
The seperation between what's fake and what's real
its obviously not a slur to me....i can only think of one word that you 'could' say was a slur....but like i said i will just use 'gentile' since you cant spin that into meaning a slur
You asked me a question, I answered it. Correct? I was trying to teach your non-intelligent ass some history that you clearly don't care to learn, so you resorted to dropping racial slurs when I proved you wrong because you can't argue an illogical ppoint. Correct?the thread was about jewish involvement....i was contributing to the thread if you want to talk about catholic and protestant involvment why not make your own thread
Black people can be called nikka on the coli.
White people can be called cac.
Hispanics can be called spics.
Muslims can be shyt on.
Asians can be called gooks.
Say anything about the Jews and bushes....
Just shows how they are the chosen people and how much power they have which is why black people have suffered for so long.
You're a coward. I'm not even a Jew so why are you afraid to admit what you said?
Your heart pumps slushie breh.
