JAY Z named as codefendant in newest civil suit against Diddy

SadimirPutin

Superstar
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
15,604
Reputation
2,217
Daps
59,516
Several thoughts

This tactic of coming decades later to make accusations is very shaky to me.....namely because physical evidentiary proof is likely paper thin at this point at best and possibly non existent tbh

This tactic of civil not criminal should raise eyebrows TO ANYONE......along with length of time...it reeks of shakedowns.

The internet LOVES to pick and choose who to believe abhorrent stuff about based on who they are a fan of......I am very skeptical of these claims but I AM NEUTRAL enough to give it a listen and let things play out. Jay-Z's statement and suit against Buzbee makes me think he is strong enough in his own convictions and legal advice

Proximity to Diddy really is going to hurt a bunch of people credibility, legality and monetarily wise....it's going to spawn a cottage industry of lawsuits and settlements.
 

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,416
Reputation
4,055
Daps
46,514
After it’s over their won’t be any demanding that the women involved faces legal consequences for lying or the lawyer. The accusation alone is enough to ruin your career and reputation.

Thing is Jay been out of the public eye for so long that I'm not sure it does. If he wins this (which based on the attorney, he might), then Jay has enough cache still to spin the narrative back to "look how they try to destroy black men".

The reason why the Diddy shyt stuck was because it was an open secret anyway and the raids revealed dude was a complete pervert. With this Jay allegation, it's A LOT harder to prove.
 

RasNas

Pro
Joined
Dec 20, 2016
Messages
677
Reputation
235
Daps
1,293
I believe it's plausible it's true but he's most likely going to beat it. There's not enough evidence to proove any of this in court unless something else we don't know get's revelead soon.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,554
Reputation
7,175
Daps
110,598
I believe it's plausible it's true but he's most likely going to beat it. There's not enough evidence to proove any of this in court unless something else we don't know get's revelead soon.
Not quite sure what you’re saying - but I agree with the second part.

Spoilation of evidence is a real thing here: there don’t appear to be: 1) any DNA records; 2) any medical examination records for signs of sexual assault or physical trauma; 3) any phone records from the accuser; 4) any police reports; 5) any outside individuals she contacted as witnesses (as of yet, aside from her father).

At the same time, this was a successor to a large event: 1) JAY Z can be confirmed to have been at various locations that night with accompanying photographs; 2) JAY Z will also likely have a calendar, a schedule, or a set of communications with staff on where he attended: 3) JAY Z will have witnesses that night; 4) he may even have old credit card receipts showing purchases at various clubs, bars, and venues that verify his whereabouts.

This is a monumentous effort of a civil case.
 

NobodyReally

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
8,417
Reputation
3,137
Daps
28,207
Reppin
Cornfields, cows, & an one stoplight town
Several thoughts

This tactic of coming decades later to make accusations is very shaky to me.....namely because physical evidentiary proof is likely paper thin at this point at best and possibly non existent tbh

This tactic of civil not criminal should raise eyebrows TO ANYONE......along with length of time...it reeks of shakedowns.

The internet LOVES to pick and choose who to believe abhorrent stuff about based on who they are a fan of......I am very skeptical of these claims but I AM NEUTRAL enough to give it a listen and let things play out. Jay-Z's statement and suit against Buzbee makes me think he is strong enough in his own convictions and legal advice

Proximity to Diddy really is going to hurt a bunch of people credibility, legality and monetarily wise....it's going to spawn a cottage industry of lawsuits and settlements.
It's funny how people are OK with allegations of child abuse, sexual abuse, rape against the church and creepy olympics coaches and doctors decades later, but as soon as it's a popular celebrity, it's sus. Nobody is calling the women's olympic team a liar or the victims of the Catholic church. We've been through decades of these allegations and there's a ton of psychological and legal data that explains why victims don't feel safe coming forward right away. A 13 year old girl going to the police and/or her parents to explain Jay Z and Puffy sexually violated her, at the height of their popularity, is so unlikely. People come forward when they feel safe, when they have some distance from the incident, and definitely when they see other people have the courage to come forward. That's just how it goes and how it always goes. Also criminal charges have a time limit, civil charges do not, so yes, if the criminal statute of limitation has expired, the civil is the only recourse.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,336
Reputation
4,823
Daps
67,837
You can request a mediation where if you can’t come to a resolution over your legal issue, no information can be released or utilized later.
More specifically, you signed an agreement before entering into the mediation that the mediation itself is confidential. And then you can come to an agreement to settle including nondisclosure. Jay Z said fukk you and sued for extortion knowing the ramifications.
 

SadimirPutin

Superstar
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
15,604
Reputation
2,217
Daps
59,516
It's funny how people are OK with allegations of child abuse, sexual abuse, rape against the church and creepy olympics coaches and doctors decades later, but as soon as it's a popular celebrity, it's sus. Nobody is calling the women's olympic team a liar or the victims of the Catholic church. We've been through decades of these allegations and there's a ton of psychological and legal data that explains why victims don't feel safe coming forward right away. A 13 year old girl going to the police and/or her parents to explain Jay Z and Puffy sexually violated her, at the height of their popularity, is so unlikely. People come forward when they feel safe, when they have some distance from the incident, and definitely when they see other people have the courage to come forward. That's just how it goes and how it always goes. Also criminal charges have a time limit, civil charges do not, so yes, if the criminal statute of limitation has expired, the civil is the only recourse.

Fair points

As I said I am neutral enough to listen as I have no dog in the fight.....
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
49,496
Reputation
17,890
Daps
254,844
Reppin
Harlem
It's funny how people are OK with allegations of child abuse, sexual abuse, rape against the church and creepy olympics coaches and doctors decades later, but as soon as it's a popular celebrity, it's sus. Nobody is calling the women's olympic team a liar or the victims of the Catholic church. We've been through decades of these allegations and there's a ton of psychological and legal data that explains why victims don't feel safe coming forward right away. A 13 year old girl going to the police and/or her parents to explain Jay Z and Puffy sexually violated her, at the height of their popularity, is so unlikely. People come forward when they feel safe, when they have some distance from the incident, and definitely when they see other people have the courage to come forward. That's just how it goes and how it always goes. Also criminal charges have a time limit, civil charges do not, so yes, if the criminal statute of limitation has expired, the civil is the only recourse.
I think part of it is in all the examples you gave, church olympics etc, They were prosecuted on criminal charges for a crime.
People are usually on board with criminal charges,
In cases where its just a civil suit for money years later people get kinda sus about it
Moreover in civil suits, if i recall correctly the accuser has no burden of proof in a civil suit, Meaning they can accuse anybody of anything and have it go to trial. The defendant has to prove their innocence. With criminal cases, the accuser has the burden of proof and has to prove the guilt of the defendant.
 

richaveli83

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
54,311
Reputation
20,215
Daps
268,048
Reppin
Dallas, Texas but living in Houston, Texas
Several thoughts

This tactic of coming decades later to make accusations is very shaky to me.....namely because physical evidentiary proof is likely paper thin at this point at best and possibly non existent tbh

This tactic of civil not criminal should raise eyebrows TO ANYONE......along with length of time...it reeks of shakedowns.

The internet LOVES to pick and choose who to believe abhorrent stuff about based on who they are a fan of......I am very skeptical of these claims but I AM NEUTRAL enough to give it a listen and let things play out. Jay-Z's statement and suit against Buzbee makes me think he is strong enough in his own convictions and legal advice

Proximity to Diddy really is going to hurt a bunch of people credibility, legality and monetarily wise....it's going to spawn a cottage industry of lawsuits and settlements.
This is really unfortunate. Diddy has been a big socialte for decades. Almost every rapper, actor, professional athlete, and lesser extent politician has gone to his parties, took a picture with him, had business with him, etc. Now people will accuse anyone who met Diddy or took a picture with him of being involved in the freak offs and all kinds of wicked stuff.
 

jackswstd

Retired
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
72,948
Reputation
8,907
Daps
264,957
Reppin
Chicago
Having a hard time wrapping my head around a 13 year old girl going to the VMA’s alone. Jay coming out swinging against the allegations makes me believe this all just a money grab from the lawyer. Of course people are gonna assume guilt because Jay immediately responded, you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t in that regard. The fact is even if it is completely false, people will still believe it and his rep is gonna take a hit.
 
Top