Jmare007
pico pal q lee
Most thread over there are really useful for about 5-10 pages. After that it normally becomes repetitive or people start throwing shots at one another because they disagree about something. That's when I stop reading
The GWE was never about the results to me. It was all about getting to watch new styles - I finally gave Lucha a shot (failed for the most part), confirmed my "meh" feeling about shoot style and loved the little I saw from WOS -, wrestlers and discuss about them (or read people discuss about them). Reading the results is useless if you don't take into account number of ballots and average vote. It's weird though, I posted the results of the project in this thread in April and we had a couple of debates with the brehs, including you (about Dusty), so I was a little surprised when you acted like the GWE was this new thing you never heard of before.
But anyways, it was 151 different people giving a ranking of 100 wrestlers, of course there's gonna be results someone doesn't agree with. People at PWO lost their shyt at some of the standings, legit meltdowns happened and whole podcast were made...it was fukking hilarious imo
I put Lawler in my top 5, way ahead of all those wrestlers you mentioned, I love his work and dude was dope for 30 years, way longer than any of them. People have different tastes, who cares
Also, the rankings on GWE are fukking absurd. The Rock isn't even in the top 100, but Bobby Eaton (who I do love) is like top 20 all time. Jerry Lawler (I've seen the DVDVR Memphis comp, so I know his true body of work and know he was great in Memphis) in the top 10 over guys like Bret/Macho/Harley/Jumbo/Rude/Steamboat/Vader/Austin/HBK/Benoit/Eddie etc. To those people, The Rock and Chris Hero are 3-4 spots away from each other. Daniel Bryan is 5 OF ALL TIME. Like, come on brehs.
The GWE was never about the results to me. It was all about getting to watch new styles - I finally gave Lucha a shot (failed for the most part), confirmed my "meh" feeling about shoot style and loved the little I saw from WOS -, wrestlers and discuss about them (or read people discuss about them). Reading the results is useless if you don't take into account number of ballots and average vote. It's weird though, I posted the results of the project in this thread in April and we had a couple of debates with the brehs, including you (about Dusty), so I was a little surprised when you acted like the GWE was this new thing you never heard of before.
But anyways, it was 151 different people giving a ranking of 100 wrestlers, of course there's gonna be results someone doesn't agree with. People at PWO lost their shyt at some of the standings, legit meltdowns happened and whole podcast were made...it was fukking hilarious imo
I put Lawler in my top 5, way ahead of all those wrestlers you mentioned, I love his work and dude was dope for 30 years, way longer than any of them. People have different tastes, who cares
Last edited: