This still doesn't even make any sense.Your logic circuits are broken again Gil.
I DO think that PG13 and Harden are on about the same level. And if I were building a team for a title, most of the time I would take PG13. But the Spurs would have beaten the Rockets whether it was PG13 or Harden - because they ARE on about the same level, and that ain't a Spurs-beating level.
Now put Lebron, Durant, Curry, or Kawhi on the Rockets instead, and they win. CP3, and they have a chance to win. Westbrook....he might have to be downgraded to that Harden/PG13 tier now.
If you're of the belief they are on the same level on a general scale, how isn't PG definitively better when Harden's play is ineffective in the postseason, whereas PG typically raises his game? The Spurs were without Kawhi, so they weren't the typical Spurs-level team - replacing Harden with PG, a player who you believe is on the same level, but is far more effective in the postseason would mean that there's a sound argument (at the very least) for beating that Kawhi-less Spurs team.
I suggest you go over the last stretch of G5, and G6, and look at Harden's play, and look at how detrimental it was to the team, especially since he didn't even bother showing any effort on either end of the court. He didn't even show up, never mind playing up to his "ability".
edit: All PG had to do was show up, and he would've put them in a far greater position of winning.
Last edited: