IT: Chapter Two Official Thread

VBM

┌∩┐(●_●)┌∩┐
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
11,946
Reputation
2,935
Daps
29,393
Reppin
Dallas by way of Houston by way of San Antonio
Overall, I give the movie a 7/10. I think the
Adrian Mellon
scene was very well done. People thinking it was thrown in for agenda sake haven't read the book. It helps kick things off in a major way. The fact that
Audra and Tom Rogan
were rendered to bit characters didn't sit right with me though. One of Pennywise's best weapons is controlling people (like he did with Bev's dad near the end of Chapter 1) moreso than posing as people themselves, so the fact that we got another jump-scare Pennywise CGI fest was meh in that respect. I will admit though that a top 3, if not top moment in the film, was
the scene with the girl under the bleachers. The girl chasing the firefly into the dark...Pennywise's face in the shadows...this girl who was innocent and been bullied for her looks thinking :pennywise: was going to take away that birthmark...standing their neck exposed while Pennywise was counting to three. THAT is the kind of shyt that was needed more throughout the movie. That was the type of stuff that made you feel uncomfortable.

Mike Hanlon' calls to the other losers
felt really rushed, but I understand the time constraints as Muschetti wanted to focus on the flashbacks/token search
. Did think it was cool that they went with a brief
IT arrives scene, although if they were going to do that, they shouldn't have gone with a b*stardized Ritual of Chud scene and just gone for broke with what was laid out in the book.

The events leading up to the confrontation.
Muschetti overdid the shyt out of this. Again, creepy Pennywise/quiet isolation would have been a go-to here. They did this well with young Stan/painting lady in Ch. 1. Instead we get the fun house effect with people ending up in different places (Bev bathroom, Ben clubhouse, etc.)

Final form Pennywise
had me like wtf. I'm like why is the damn clown head still on this spider. I actually though we were going to get a bigger version of what was shown in the IT arrives scene. I didn't mind the roasting session though as that actually is in the book (following the ritual). The Losers showing no fear injures Pennywise almost as much as the ritual does.

Just some freeform thoughts there. I was entertained, but the movie did feel about 15-20 min too long. I also am giving some benefit of the doubt in that I'm not sure, after having loved the miniseries as a kid, as well as the book, as well as sitting through constant false starts on this remake leading back to the late-aughts, that anything could have lived up to my expectations.

Long live :pennywise:
 

Lootpack

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
63,764
Reputation
13,273
Daps
211,581
Reppin
DM[V]
Pennywise really was on his "LOOK AT ME NOW" shyt :mjlol:

Muschietti pretty much said "Hey y'all, look at how much money we made from 2017!"

"Look at me Richie, you see me floating with these balloons?!?! :krs::ooh: I never did this shyt in the first chapter, I'm fukkin beautiful!"
 
Last edited:

Straw Hat Luffy

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
18,829
Reputation
3,727
Daps
66,225
Came to check this thread to see if the movie is good or not


All I see is people who haven't read the book

Opinions invalid I guess


I need to be a judge myself
 

NobodyReally

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
8,463
Reputation
3,173
Daps
28,396
Reppin
Cornfields, cows, & an one stoplight town
Came to check this thread to see if the movie is good or not


All I see is people who haven't read the book

Opinions invalid I guess


I need to be a judge myself

This is a weird take. Not just because the book and film are completely different mediums that have to be done different because IT is a huge ass novel. The Shining novel was brilliant, but Kubrick completely changed everything and produced a brilliant film and having read the book makes no difference about someone's perspective on the movie. I definitely feel the same about the novel IT and the film here. for example, one of the best things about the IT book for me was Patrick Hockstetter. They completely gutted the sections/moments that made him so awesome in Part I. The changes made in Part I and now Part II, just totally changed the vibe of the story. It's almost a different thing entirely.
 

NobodyReally

Superstar
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
8,463
Reputation
3,173
Daps
28,396
Reppin
Cornfields, cows, & an one stoplight town
Supercut incoming. Possibly IT Chapter 3 @7:50

- Doing press for 'IT: Chapter Two', director Andy Muschietti confirmed he's doing a long edited version including the 2 hours of the first film and the 4 hours shot of the second film, releasing it as a full one lenght feature.
- He also revealed it will include new scenes...he hasn't shot yet. And that he'll be going back to film more scenes, even tho the movie already premiered.
- Maybe Chapter 3 is coming?

 

Lootpack

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
63,764
Reputation
13,273
Daps
211,581
Reppin
DM[V]
Supercut incoming. Possibly IT Chapter 3 @7:50

- Doing press for 'IT: Chapter Two', director Andy Muschietti confirmed he's doing a long edited version including the 2 hours of the first film and the 4 hours shot of the second film, releasing it as a full one lenght feature.
- He also revealed it will include new scenes...he hasn't shot yet. And that he'll be going back to film more scenes, even tho the movie already premiered.
- Maybe Chapter 3 is coming?


Dear God I hope not :picard:

@8:20 This nikka has no idea what he's doin :russ:
 

Straw Hat Luffy

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
18,829
Reputation
3,727
Daps
66,225
This is a weird take. Not just because the book and film are completely different mediums that have to be done different because IT is a huge ass novel. The Shining novel was brilliant, but Kubrick completely changed everything and produced a brilliant film and having read the book makes no difference about someone's perspective on the movie. I definitely feel the same about the novel IT and the film here. for example, one of the best things about the IT book for me was Patrick Hockstetter. They completely gutted the sections/moments that made him so awesome in Part I. The changes made in Part I and now Part II, just totally changed the vibe of the story. It's almost a different thing entirely.

It's not a weird take when I check this thread and see people talking about the film had gay agendas lol. Like lol that scene happens in the book.


I seen the film tonight by the way. I loved it gonna give my full thoughts later.
 
Top