The bold is bullshyt black supremacist nonsense. That's the first thing.
Secondly, you seem confused as that what you are arguing in favor of. I said the Greeks surely were influenced by Egyptians, Phonecians and others prior to their rise, and during their rise. It doesn't change the fact that a lot of concepts were strictly Greek in nature. Why does it upset you to admit that?
Let's move this argument to math.
I'm trying to say that Calculus was strictly the discovery of two men. You keep bringing up the fact that Calculus wouldn't exist without Algebra, Greek Geometry and African mathematics. No one is arguing the latter, I'm merely saying that Calculus came about in an exclusive manner to two different men.
I didn't hear the bold first from a black person. And I just say that because recorded history started around 4th millennium BC. Europeans didn't know sh1t about sh1t (basically) and couldn't read or write until half of recorded history was in the fcking books. Figure out what century that was in and do simple math.
Speaking of math... it's all in the way our brain builds on knowledge through generations.. and build within each individuals brain throughout a life time. Calculus is easy for you when you're proficient in the rest. NTM Egyptian Moscow papyrus drops about 1820 BC. Then they make advancements in India. Asia. Then Middle East and Some other parts of Africa....
Then Ancient Greece comes along about 8 BC. What do you make of that? What I make of that is that ... we can make a strong arguments for influence even with- libraries being destroyed.. philosophers giving credit-but that credit being ignored, winners of wars covering up the truth, Western civilization attempting to masked parts of history, etc. - Image if we had history uncut and raw and we knew the real truth without a Western Bias behind it.