Is the Xbox Series S already a failure?

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,652
Reputation
3,794
Daps
109,685
Reppin
Tha Land
I just gave you an entire list, you give me 1 example to prove your point.

Give me a list of games, not just an exception.
Your list is bullshyt.

it comes from a Reddit user and was never confirmed in any way.

In fact right in the comments he has multiple people telling him his numbers are wrong.

You posted a bogus list made by a random internet user.

I posted numbers and information directly from developers.

Sony stans wild :wow:
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,549
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,298
Reppin
CALI

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,652
Reputation
3,794
Daps
109,685
Reppin
Tha Land

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,549
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,298
Reppin
CALI
They are all sourcing the same Reddit users random numbers.



You don’t even know/understand what your posting, but so sure of yourself.

Sony stans :mjlol:
You can personally look at the file size of those games yourself.

I don't know how I let you pull me into a bullshyt stan argument anyways, I've already said the ps5 had a small ass ssd. The point is that you aren't sacrificing performance, I've said that if the s was as powerful as the x then it wouldn't be an issue.

The series x is a better deal and you know that's a fact, but you're constantly trying to have a damn stan war.
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
49,660
Reputation
12,845
Daps
127,998
There are plenty examples of people buying something cheaper thats clearly not as good of a value as (or in some cases is for the person) a biggest bundle or package.


From, great value products, to madcatz controllers and memory cards.

I remember working at GameStop back in the ps1/2 era and warning people about madcatz products at the time.

"Just spend 30 more and get the official controller" or whatever the case is. Clearly the official PS2 controller was superior.

But people always had there reasons, and it made sense to them and it makes sense over all.

If you don't play your PlayStation but every once and a while then that madcatz controller and memory might serve you just fine.

If you only got 30 bucks to spare, then that madcatz controller is just fine.

If you a kid or teen and your mom and dad making you pay for your system and you got reg ole Walmart tv screen. That series S is perfect.

If you just don't care and want to dl games and play on a next generation console as cheap as possible.... The series S is perfect.


The Nintendo switch light is point less to me but perfect for someone else.... I can't say "just pay x amount more for the ability to dock it and how it's a waste because of how I use my switch.
 
Last edited:

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,652
Reputation
3,794
Daps
109,685
Reppin
Tha Land
You can personally look at the file size of those games yourself.
Which is what other Reddit users did in the comments and told that dude his numbers were off.

You can also google official information for any next gen game and see the sizes are about equal. And that’s coming directly from developers.

I don't know how I let you pull me into a bullshyt stan argument anyways, I've already said the ps5 had a small ass ssd. The point is that you aren't sacrificing performance, I've said that if the s was as powerful as the x then it wouldn't be an issue.
You pulled yourself in by making up lies, broken math, and inconsistent standards.

instead of just admitting your original post had flawed logic:ufdup:

The series x is a better deal and you know that's a fact, but you're constantly trying to have a damn stan war.
No. It’s not a fact.

It’s cheaper for casual players who are ok with not having 4K performance.

Again if your logic dictates to you that the series S extra storage is “required” and effectively increases its price. Then you have to apply that some logic to PS5 and Series X even.

Instead of just admitting that as true, you decided to jump down the stan rabbit whole of posting unofficial debunked info in order to bolster a lie/exaggeration.

As usual Sony stans lack self awareness:wow:
 

iceberg_is_on_fire

Wearing Lions gear when it wasn't cool
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
22,538
Reputation
5,032
Daps
63,083
Reppin
Lombardi Trophies in Allen Park
The Series S may turn out to be smart for Microsoft on two fronts.

1. Not everyone is going to want/desire a 4K console and are ok with just cleaner 1080P and 60fps. They knew about this as this was the console's original intent.
2. Availability. While the PS5/XSX aren't available in large quantities. The Switch is and the Series S outsold that so we can discredit the notion of 'its the only thing available.' If Microsoft and Sony continue having issues with the 4K consoles getting to market, the Series S is going to be there to swoop in and gain a ton of sales. We are seeing that now. This is something that they had no foresight on but will be a right place, right time type situation. Series S is on shelves to sell, it'll do so.
 
Top