murksiderock
Superstar
It's not a narrative
It's facts. Draymond Green has had no issue admitting his offense is a product of Curry.
Obviously Green is an excellent defender, one of the best ever of course.
People will chip at Bird, Wilt, Kobe, and even Shaq, for sure.
And personally, it's hard to really even call Durant a #1 for those rings.
Shaq was a real #1 becuase he was getting the most defensive attention, and still put up the numbers. Same with other number 1 options.
As where KD was getting favorable looks.
"Beg Durant to join" well, Magic entered a Lakers team that had Kareem there for him (who yall call a top 3 player) and his team drafted Janes Worthy. But we don't knock Magic for that.
"Missing the offs in his prime". Well Kobe missed the playoffs in his prime. So did Kareem, several times in fact.
"Subpar start" - not only did he have ankle injuries, so it's not as if he stunk, but he was also drafted into one of the worst organizations in pro sports. The team made the playoffs once in the prior 15 seasons, and only won 1 playoff series in the previous 20. And his rookie year he made all-rookie team, 2nd year they didn't progress, but they had another coach and he was splitting time with Monta Ellis who was another ball dominant guard who didn't pass much.
The reality is that older players have the benefit of playing... decades in the past. So they don't get scrutinized much.
I am kinda with you on the Durant thing, I guess my hang-up currently is:
•Durant was and has been a great player for longer than Steph, and was viewed for several years as the second best player next to LeBron right up until Chef's '16. Even then there was no solid majority willing to put the wunderkind Steph who blew up into an All-Timer outta nowhere in like a 2-year span over Durant who had been an elite player for well over a half-decade...
So the fact that Durant was elite for longer carries some weight to me;
•either way its sliced, once Durant went to GS they had the second and third best players in basketball on the roster. Regardless of who one wants as #2, but i do know the consensus of the time, of that 2016-19 period they were together, was that not only was Durant the Dubs best player but he was arguably the best player in basketball period...
Nobody was having "best player alive" conversations about Chef after Durant came. And you know I'm far from a Durant homer but I do feel a way about rewriting that window in time contrary to what the popular opinion was in real time...
It was always recognized that Chef was the focal point of the defense, and overall the engine that made that Warriors machine so hot...
What i will say is that compared to many other greats, if not most, including Steph if their careers continue playing out in this fashion, KD is not the same caliber of #1 that other guys were and its going to justifiably hurt him when cats talk about his historical standing. Including comparing him to Steph; while I think the 3 years they were together KD was the best player, the totality of their careers while they weren't together favors Steph pretty clearly and could end up doing so demonstrably....he's almost certain, unless Durant goes on an unlikely late-career run of dominance, to finish his career sufficiently and comfortably ahead of KD...
We need rep back...
Badly!