I think it's harder to build a MLB team. When you draft players you usually have to give em time to devolop in your system because they are raw players in most cases. Plus depending how much money you have to work with you have to assembly within that budget.
...yeah but nobody REALLY builds thru the draft. If you have money in baseball and are willing to spend you can easily have a winning team
Brehs there is no salary cap in baseball. Coca cola can decide to buy the braves and give the gm a blank check and they sign fielder and all the bluechip FAs and walk to the nlcs.
Nintendo did it with the mariners, but sold the players off when their investment choked.
...yeah but nobody REALLY builds thru the draft. If you have money in baseball and are willing to spend you can easily have a winning team
Brehs there is no salary cap in baseball. Coca cola can decide to buy the braves and give the gm a blank check and they sign fielder and all the bluechip FAs and walk to the nlcs.
Nintendo did it with the mariners, but sold the players off when their investment choked.
It might be easier to build a winning NBA team (mainly by getting lucky in the draft) but few teams have actually won a championship...so to build a championship NBA team is obviously very difficult.
That is so false. Most winning teams in baseball, have success by drafting good players and/or acquiring players through trade. The Rays/Nats/Rangers have had their success, because of the methods I listed above.
Sure the Yankees had success w/ FA's, but a good portion of their best players are a result of drafting and/or trading. Derek Jeter; Mariono Rivera, Jorge Posada, Bernie Williams, and Andy Pettite were key members of the 96-03 run they had, and they were all homegrown players.
That is so false. Most winning teams in baseball, have success by drafting good players and/or acquiring players through trade. The Rays/Nats/Rangers have had their success, because of the methods I listed above.
Sure the Yankees had success w/ FA's, but a good portion of their best players are a result of drafting and/or trading. Derek Jeter; Mariono Rivera, Jorge Posada, Bernie Williams, and Andy Pettite were key members of the 96-03 run they had, and they were all homegrown players.
How is it easy in the NBA?
You have to be able to 1st:
1.) Be in a market that players like
2.) be in the lottery
3.) Win the lottery or hope your franchise player falls to your team's pick in case you don't win the lottery.
4.) Oh by the way, hope the player you pick #1 is a transcendent, franchise player ala Tim Duncan or Lebron James that you can build around.
Just because you pick in the lottery doesn't mean that once-in-a generation talent is available to draft the year you win the lottery..
You also have to not have bad contracts on your payroll to have the flexibility to build around your transcendent star.
Oh and also hope your star will want to stay in your city during his prime..
A lot of it is based on luck as well as smarts.
It's mad hard..
You do understand the difference between relative (easier) and definitive (easy) right?
A bad GM can flourish in the NBA if he stumbles into the right player or two. .
But what if that bad GM gave out some bad contracts that totally handicap your franchise for years?
Then your up shyt's creek..
This is true. I am not denying that being an NBA GM has it's challenges I am only saying that MLB and NFL have more challenges. Their are plenty of baseball teams up that same shyts creek and there is no Bron or Duncan that can turn them around immediately. They gotta build up a farm system or they will continue to suck. In football the only way to turn around is to find the right guys to fill your team out in the draft. One great pick or FA pick up can completely turn a NBA teams fortunes. Can't say the same for the other two sports.