SuburbanPimp
Giving game to lames since the 90s
Ive enjoyed Invincible, but its first season isn't better than the first season on The Boys
Certain characters need plot armor, even Martin with Arya and Jon Snow in Game of Thrones, sure he had a lot of us going with killing Drogo, and other fan favorites, but he says it himself, you have to stop trying to subvert expectations, or else the story is lost, and you're creating twists chapters and murder porn all for the sake of coming off original. So yes, some characters have to be safe. However in the Boys, its less about who's going to die and more about loss...essentially who has more to lose and how they lose it. For some its their sanity...for others its a child, a loved one, or even fame. Character death doesn't happen only in the literal sense.
This is a cop out to me.
Having characters, especially villains, act out of character or doing dumbass things for the sake of progressing the story should always be called out. Write the shyt better.
The first season of The Boys was great, but I’ve noticed that there’s a huge element of deus ex machina when it comes to the protagonist of the show. They’re never really in danger and that takes a lot from the show for me.
They removed what made the boys something to be feared in the comics for some reason. The butcher should be seen as a monster that rivals homelander and makes homelander second guess crossing lines. As homelander is right now, he's just unchecked power free to do whatever he wants, but doesn't because of fame. That's weak.
Where do you rate Invincible among them below The Boys?Boys was better as a comic. first season of invincible was great but the storylines apart from Omniman's own are not that captivating to me. I enjoyed Preacher way more as an adaptation to a tv series from a comic than i did with The Boys and i loved that comic. As far as adaptations go
-Punisher
-Watchmen
-Preacher
-The Boys.
Only watched the first ep of "Invincible" but I was pretty towards it.
The swerve at the end was cool but when a series premiere is only good or talked about because it's last 2-3 minutes....I dunno. This shyt was hyped to high heaven, I expected more from the first ep.
Obviously this has no bearing on the rest of the reason. The rest of the eps could be GOAT status, I'm just going off my initial impression.
And I dunno what cats are talking about criticizing "The Boys" season 2. The way they skewered Trump/MAGA with Homelander/st0rmfr0nt and their movement was incredible.
Fred.
The way both St0rmfr0nt and Homelander were defeated was lame and not realistic. And they ruined a lot of the realism they built within the context of the show with The Boys supposedly being like Most Wanted but Hughey and Mother's Milk going on road trips with a world famous suoer hero like it's nothing.Yeah I’m genuinely confused by the people badmouthing season 2 in here. People calling the characters cartoonish yet st0rmfr0nt is probably the most realistic depiction of a modern day “edgy” racist that I’ve seen on a show or movie.
I watched the first two episodes of Invincible. Very entertaining show but it’ll have to level up considerably for me to put it above the Boys which managed to be entertaining and thought provoking without being didactic
The way both St0rmfr0nt and Homelander were defeated was lame and not realistic. And they ruined a lot of the realism they built within the context of the show with The Boys supposedly being like Most Wanted but Hughey and Mother's Milk going on road trips with a world famous suoer hero like it's nothing.
The thing is about The Boys that it isn’t following the comic at all. The finale will be completely different. Invincible seems to follow the comic but more condense.I absolutely love both shows.
If I HAVE to pick I'll take The Boys. A little less mature sure, also a lot less predictable. But not even a spoiler (looked into the comic, never read it) could ruin that finale for me.