The reason infrastructure was passed was so they could focus on BBB, right?I feel like you're missing my point. Nothing I'm saying advocated for "all or nothing," I'm saying that the reason not to pass the Infrastructure Bill prematurely was the get bits of the BBB bill or some other progressive goals passed.
I bolded and am capitalizing PREMATURELY here. There was always gonna be a point where everyone had to take what they could get and pass what's possible. My complaint is that they rushed to pass what was on the table before they had to. What that did was remove opportunities to leverage votes on the Infrastructure bill, which Manchin badly wanted to pass, for some additional progressive pieces getting through. My main example of a progressive goal is something that wasn't even necessary to keep in BBB and that's just extending the Child Care Tax Credits in some way shape or form.
So to reiterate, literally nobody is talking about "all or nothing," go back through my posts. I'm talking about holding off longer on passing the Infrastructure Bill, because there was no added benefit to passing it sooner. It just took away any opportunity to try and pass anything else once they gave Manchin everything he'd asked for and removed pressure from other centrist Dems that wanted the bipartisan infrastructure bill to pass.
Just to clarify again, I'm not saying that they never should have passed Infrastructure. I'm saying they rushed it unnecessarily and that took away any chance to negotiate more in an interim where nothing else passed anyway.
Manchin was active in the negotiations for both until he Went on Fox News and said “he can’t get there”
I don’t think anything could’ve been done differently, tbh