Pull Up the Roots
I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
It's a firm no.Is that a yes or no?
It's a firm no.Is that a yes or no?
racist cacs get the most amount of defference in this country
From their own, and then by the legions of idiotic non whites that think that excusing cac racism gives them standing.
This country is ridiculous
I obviously disagree. No fan of Trump but this is a nothing burger.It's a firm no.
Right? Her Dad is responsible for literally hundreds of thousands of deaths under false pretenses. But they are pro-Kamala so they cool now. lolCAC on CAC crime. We supposed to give a fukk about The Cheney's now?
Are you retarded enough to think they’ll stop at the Cheney’s not go after Obama or Kamala?CAC on CAC crime. We supposed to give a fukk about The Cheney's now?
i dont give a fukk about a dikk cheney, I am addressing trump talking crazy about KamalaYou must hate the fact that Kamala embraces that evil, racist, disgusting Cheney family.
CAC on CAC crime. We supposed to give a fukk about The Cheney's now?
I obviously disagree. No fan of Trump but this is a nothing burger.
I don't give a fukk about Liz Cheney. However, I do give a fukk about Trump's violent rhetoric and the duty some feel bound by to "sane wash" it.CAC on CAC crime. We supposed to give a fukk about The Cheney's now?
How can you call this a critique of "war hawks" when Trump is one himself, had them in his administration, and still has them in his transition team? Mentioning someone by name and imagining a scenario where they are targeted goes beyond a typical critique of hawkish policies. This was a tacit call for violence against his perceived enemies.I obviously disagree. No fan of Trump but this is a nothing burger.
i dont give a fukk about a dikk cheney, I am addressing trump talking crazy about Kamala
How can you call this a critique of "war hawks" when Trump is one himself,
That's really where we at in 2024. Go so far with the Democrat shilling the Cheney's are allies we gotta be concerned about because Kamala is cool with themRight? Her Dad is responsible for literally hundreds of thousands of deaths under false pretenses. But they are pro-Kamala so they cool now. lol
Just because he has similar proclivities doesn't make his critique untrue. And he's not calling for violence he's just saying warhawks should fight wars to. It's not even an original idea. Anti-war advocates say similar often.I don't give a fukk about Liz Cheney. However, I do give a fukk about Trump's violent rhetoric and the duty some feel bound by to "sane wash" it.
How can you call this a critique of "war hawks" when Trump is one himself, had them in his administration, and still has them in his transition team? Mentioning someone by name and imagining a scenario where they are targeted goes beyond a typical critique of hawkish policies. What Trump did was a tacit call for violence.