Imagine If Biden Or Kamala Said This. What The fukk Is Happening?

Sir Richard Spirit

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
5,074
Reputation
446
Daps
16,562
CAC on CAC crime. We supposed to give a fukk about The Cheney's now? :heh:

I obviously disagree. No fan of Trump but this is a nothing burger.

I’m 38 y/o. I remember her calling Obama radical because he wanted Healthcare for all. I remember the bytch wrote a book with her da.d shytting on Obama.

fukk her and fukk her daddy.
 

Pull Up the Roots

I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,178
Reputation
7,097
Daps
89,575
Reppin
Detroit
CAC on CAC crime. We supposed to give a fukk about The Cheney's now? :heh:
I don't give a fukk about Liz Cheney. However, I do give a fukk about Trump's violent rhetoric and the duty some feel bound by to "sane wash" it.

I obviously disagree. No fan of Trump but this is a nothing burger.
How can you call this a critique of "war hawks" when Trump is one himself, had them in his administration, and still has them in his transition team? Mentioning someone by name and imagining a scenario where they are targeted goes beyond a typical critique of hawkish policies. This was a tacit call for violence against his perceived enemies.
 

UpNext

Superstar
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
4,347
Reputation
870
Daps
15,699
Right? Her Dad is responsible for literally hundreds of thousands of deaths under false pretenses. But they are pro-Kamala so they cool now. lol
That's really where we at in 2024. Go so far with the Democrat shilling the Cheney's are allies we gotta be concerned about because Kamala is cool with them:wow:
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,405
Reputation
2,856
Daps
68,452
Reppin
New York
I don't give a fukk about Liz Cheney. However, I do give a fukk about Trump's violent rhetoric and the duty some feel bound by to "sane wash" it.


How can you call this a critique of "war hawks" when Trump is one himself, had them in his administration, and still has them in his transition team? Mentioning someone by name and imagining a scenario where they are targeted goes beyond a typical critique of hawkish policies. What Trump did was a tacit call for violence.
Just because he has similar proclivities doesn't make his critique untrue. And he's not calling for violence he's just saying warhawks should fight wars to. It's not even an original idea. Anti-war advocates say similar often.
 
Top