Imagine If Biden Or Kamala Said This. What The fukk Is Happening?

DaHNIC82

Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
20,587
Reputation
5,740
Daps
89,308
Reppin
Off The Cuff Radio/ScrewballRadio/BudeBoyEnt
Learn to spell. It’s no wonder you’re such a grade A retard you fascist ball sniffing fakkit
You sound like a whole scary ass bytch. Talking about Bubbubut we gonna be next :damn:.

This white folks shyt. CAC on CAC. They don't need you hug a tree ass nikkas rushing to every defense.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
24,711
Reputation
11,158
Daps
106,446
Reppin
Detroit
Just because he has similar proclivities doesn't make his critique untrue. And he's not calling for violence he's just saying warhawks should fight wars to. It's not even an original idea. Anti-war advocates say similar often.
Trump's remark isn't a valid critique of "war hawk" policies though (you would have to ignore EVERYTHING he's been saying to genuinely believe that), it's a thinly veiled threat that imagines a violent scenario aimed at a specific person. Anti-war advocates may call for accountability in a similar vein, but they speak from a genuine belief in opposing war - Trump doesn't.

Words like his don'r just express ideas; they create an atmosphere where hostility is condoned and encouraged toward political opponents. Hiding behind the claim that this is "just critique" is a weak attempt to sanitize what's actually reckless, dangerous rhetoric with serious implications.

Trump makes more than 100 threats to prosecute or punish perceived enemies

Trump's "enemies within" list.

 

Space Cowboy

Christ is King
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,476
Reputation
927
Daps
15,151
Reppin
CowboysNation
You sound like a whole scary ass bytch. Talking about Bubbubut we gonna be next :damn:.

This white folks shyt. CAC on CAC. They don't need your hug a tree ass nikkas rushing to every defense.
As if they didn’t have whole Obama effigies while he was president. You think Trump won’t consider Obama or Kamala to be one of his enemies?
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
32,348
Reputation
3,574
Daps
74,253
Reppin
New York
Trump's remark isn't a valid critique of "war hawk" policies though (you would have to ignore EVERYTHING he's been saying to genuinely believe that), it's a thinly veiled threat that imagines a violent scenario aimed at a specific person. Anti-war advocates may call for accountability in a similar vein, but they speak from a genuine belief in opposing war - Trump doesn't.

Words like his don'r just express ideas; they create an atmosphere where hostility is condoned and encouraged toward political opponents. Hiding behind the claim that this is "just critique" is a weak attempt to sanitize what's actually reckless, dangerous rhetoric with serious implications.

Trump makes more than 100 threats to prosecute or punish perceived enemies

Trump's "enemies within" list.

I don't think so. But believe what you want and clutch your pearls accordingly. lol
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
24,711
Reputation
11,158
Daps
106,446
Reppin
Detroit
Dude, you called words terrorism. Yeah, that's pearl clutching.
Well actually, believing in the idea of stochastic terrorism isn't clutching pearls over words, but about recognizing the real-world effects of such inflammatory rhetoric. When public figures paint certain groups or individuals as threats, they're playing with fire, knowing that it can push unstable individuals toward violence, even if they don't directly say, "Go hurt X." It reflects how words increase the probability of violence. It's a proven reality, not an overreaction, and we've seen this play out in attacks on individuals and groups targeted in this way. See: Payton Gendron, Dylann Roof, Brenton Tarrant, and so on. They've referenced the likes of Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Trump, Great Replacement theory, and more as motivations for their terrorism.
 
Top