Imagine If Biden Or Kamala Said This. What The fukk Is Happening?

DaHNIC82

Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
18,762
Reputation
5,021
Daps
81,547
Reppin
Off The Cuff Radio/ScrewballRadio/BudeBoyEnt
Learn to spell. It’s no wonder you’re such a grade A retard you fascist ball sniffing fakkit
You sound like a whole scary ass bytch. Talking about Bubbubut we gonna be next :damn:.

This white folks shyt. CAC on CAC. They don't need you hug a tree ass nikkas rushing to every defense.
 

Pull Up the Roots

I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,178
Reputation
7,097
Daps
89,570
Reppin
Detroit
Just because he has similar proclivities doesn't make his critique untrue. And he's not calling for violence he's just saying warhawks should fight wars to. It's not even an original idea. Anti-war advocates say similar often.
Trump's remark isn't a valid critique of "war hawk" policies though (you would have to ignore EVERYTHING he's been saying to genuinely believe that), it's a thinly veiled threat that imagines a violent scenario aimed at a specific person. Anti-war advocates may call for accountability in a similar vein, but they speak from a genuine belief in opposing war - Trump doesn't.

Words like his don'r just express ideas; they create an atmosphere where hostility is condoned and encouraged toward political opponents. Hiding behind the claim that this is "just critique" is a weak attempt to sanitize what's actually reckless, dangerous rhetoric with serious implications.

Trump makes more than 100 threats to prosecute or punish perceived enemies

Trump's "enemies within" list.

 

Space Cowboy

Allahu Akbar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,144
Reputation
846
Daps
13,767
Reppin
CowboysNation
You sound like a whole scary ass bytch. Talking about Bubbubut we gonna be next :damn:.

This white folks shyt. CAC on CAC. They don't need your hug a tree ass nikkas rushing to every defense.
As if they didn’t have whole Obama effigies while he was president. You think Trump won’t consider Obama or Kamala to be one of his enemies?
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,405
Reputation
2,856
Daps
68,452
Reppin
New York
Trump's remark isn't a valid critique of "war hawk" policies though (you would have to ignore EVERYTHING he's been saying to genuinely believe that), it's a thinly veiled threat that imagines a violent scenario aimed at a specific person. Anti-war advocates may call for accountability in a similar vein, but they speak from a genuine belief in opposing war - Trump doesn't.

Words like his don'r just express ideas; they create an atmosphere where hostility is condoned and encouraged toward political opponents. Hiding behind the claim that this is "just critique" is a weak attempt to sanitize what's actually reckless, dangerous rhetoric with serious implications.

Trump makes more than 100 threats to prosecute or punish perceived enemies

Trump's "enemies within" list.

I don't think so. But believe what you want and clutch your pearls accordingly. lol
 

Pull Up the Roots

I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,178
Reputation
7,097
Daps
89,570
Reppin
Detroit
I don't think so. But believe what you want and clutch your pearls accordingly. lol
It's not pearl clutching. It's reckoning with our current reality. Something you don't seem to be capable of doing. I mean, you fell for Tulsi Gabbard and Jimmy Dore's con game after all.
 

Pull Up the Roots

I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
21,178
Reputation
7,097
Daps
89,570
Reppin
Detroit
Dude, you called words terrorism. Yeah, that's pearl clutching.
Well actually, believing in the idea of stochastic terrorism isn't clutching pearls over words, but about recognizing the real-world effects of such inflammatory rhetoric. When public figures paint certain groups or individuals as threats, they're playing with fire, knowing that it can push unstable individuals toward violence, even if they don't directly say, "Go hurt X." It reflects how words increase the probability of violence. It's a proven reality, not an overreaction, and we've seen this play out in attacks on individuals and groups targeted in this way. See: Payton Gendron, Dylann Roof, Brenton Tarrant, and so on. They've referenced the likes of Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Trump, Great Replacement theory, and more as motivations for their terrorism.
 
Top