Space Cowboy
Allahu Akbar
Learn to spell. It’s no wonder you’re such a grade A retard you fascist ball sniffing fakkitNikka Shutcho emotional bytch azz up.
Learn to spell. It’s no wonder you’re such a grade A retard you fascist ball sniffing fakkitNikka Shutcho emotional bytch azz up.
You sound like a whole scary ass bytch. Talking about Bubbubut we gonna be next .Learn to spell. It’s no wonder you’re such a grade A retard you fascist ball sniffing fakkit
Right? Her Dad is responsible for literally hundreds of thousands of deaths under false pretenses. But they are pro-Kamala so they cool
Trump's remark isn't a valid critique of "war hawk" policies though (you would have to ignore EVERYTHING he's been saying to genuinely believe that), it's a thinly veiled threat that imagines a violent scenario aimed at a specific person. Anti-war advocates may call for accountability in a similar vein, but they speak from a genuine belief in opposing war - Trump doesn't.Just because he has similar proclivities doesn't make his critique untrue. And he's not calling for violence he's just saying warhawks should fight wars to. It's not even an original idea. Anti-war advocates say similar often.
As if they didn’t have whole Obama effigies while he was president. You think Trump won’t consider Obama or Kamala to be one of his enemies?You sound like a whole scary ass bytch. Talking about Bubbubut we gonna be next .
This white folks shyt. CAC on CAC. They don't need your hug a tree ass nikkas rushing to every defense.
I don't think so. But believe what you want and clutch your pearls accordingly. lolTrump's remark isn't a valid critique of "war hawk" policies though (you would have to ignore EVERYTHING he's been saying to genuinely believe that), it's a thinly veiled threat that imagines a violent scenario aimed at a specific person. Anti-war advocates may call for accountability in a similar vein, but they speak from a genuine belief in opposing war - Trump doesn't.
Words like his don'r just express ideas; they create an atmosphere where hostility is condoned and encouraged toward political opponents. Hiding behind the claim that this is "just critique" is a weak attempt to sanitize what's actually reckless, dangerous rhetoric with serious implications.
Trump makes more than 100 threats to prosecute or punish perceived enemies
Trump's "enemies within" list.
Trump has threatened dozens of times to use the government to target political enemies - CREW | Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Trump has repeatedly promised to weaponize the federal government during a second administration by pursuing revenge, retaliation and retribution against his political enemies.www.citizensforethics.orgTrump Escalates Threats to Political Opponents He Deems the ‘Enemy’
Never before has a presidential nominee openly suggested turning the military on Americans simply because they oppose his candidacy. With voting underway, Donald Trump has turned to dark vows of retribution.www.nytimes.comA Brief History of Trump’s Violent Remarks
Here are 40 instances in which the former president incited or praised violence against his fellow citizens.www.theatlantic.com
It's not pearl clutching. It's reckoning with our current reality. Something you don't seem to be capable of doing. I mean, you fell for Tulsi Gabbard and Jimmy Dore's con game after all.I don't think so. But believe what you want and clutch your pearls accordingly. lol
Dude, you called words terrorism. Yeah, that's pearl clutching.It's not pearl clutching. It's reckoning with our current reality. Something you don't seem to be capable of doing. I mean, you fell for Tulsi Gabbard and Jimmy Dore's con game after all.
Obama has nothing to do with Cheney.
Well actually, believing in the idea of stochastic terrorism isn't clutching pearls over words, but about recognizing the real-world effects of such inflammatory rhetoric. When public figures paint certain groups or individuals as threats, they're playing with fire, knowing that it can push unstable individuals toward violence, even if they don't directly say, "Go hurt X." It reflects how words increase the probability of violence. It's a proven reality, not an overreaction, and we've seen this play out in attacks on individuals and groups targeted in this way. See: Payton Gendron, Dylann Roof, Brenton Tarrant, and so on. They've referenced the likes of Ben Shapiro, Tim Pool, Trump, Great Replacement theory, and more as motivations for their terrorism.Dude, you called words terrorism. Yeah, that's pearl clutching.