I'm Officially DONE with Marvel.. Delete this thread. fukk the MCU and fukk Disney

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
48,834
Reputation
17,560
Daps
251,658
Reppin
Harlem
They plugged Hulk into Thor Ragnarok out of nowhere and everybody loved it. Nobody said shyt. :yeshrug:
Realistically they scavenged a fantastic hulk story and made a good Thor movie out it.I wouldn't really call it out of nowhere. I gave a pass though because hulk doesn't have solo rights.
 

BillBanneker

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
8,840
Reputation
656
Daps
19,887
Reppin
NULL
They already reintroducing all the same characters though. There's a new Cap in the Bucky Falcon series, They doing a SHe hulk series, Vision is coming back in Wanda, They're bring in a New Thor, and and New Hawkeye.A New Black widow has been confirmed. That's a new version of all the original avengers confirmed except Ironman, who they basically made Spider-man take up the mantle for. All they have to do is the same exact thing they doing now but with less baggage.


Falcon isn't Rodgers, Jane Foster isn't Odinson, Kate Bishop isn't Barton, etc. That isn't the same thing as re-booting the same person and you know it.
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
48,834
Reputation
17,560
Daps
251,658
Reppin
Harlem
The stories haven't been some groundbreaking art to date EXCEPT for the fact they are all connected. That's the best thing the MCU has going for it. To throw that away is just dumb especially financially speaking.
Financially speaking in what way exactly? Are you seriously trying to act like people don't watch super hero reboots? :mjlol:
probably the most ludicrous statement ever made. This isn't just the third version of spiderman, this will be the third version of x-men, fantastic four, hulk and even captian america in you include the b movies. Second version of blade coming soon, which will likely outgross all three of the originals. Second version of Nick Fury. The list goes on and profit only continues to grow.
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
48,834
Reputation
17,560
Daps
251,658
Reppin
Harlem
Falcon isn't Rodgers, Jane Foster isn't Odinson, Kate Bishop isn't Barton, etc. That isn't the same thing as re-booting the same person and you know it.
Cmon breh, it's a soft reboot at the very least. The avengers roster in the comics rotated with all different characters all the time, sometime they beast on the team instead of hulk for example, but they never just replaced the whole roster all at onec with new people taking up the same mantel as the old ones all simultaneous like this.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,514
Reputation
2,881
Daps
68,947
Reppin
New York
Financially speaking in what way exactly? Are you seriously trying to act like people don't watch super hero reboots? :mjlol:
probably the most ludicrous statement ever made. This isn't just the third version of spiderman, this will be the third version of x-men, fantastic four, hulk and even captian america in you include the b movies. Second version of blade coming soon, which will likely outgross all three of the originals. Second version of Nick Fury. The list goes on and profit only continues to grow.
Throwing familiar guest superheroes in movies is an easier way to box office jamboree especially in the MCU.
Reboots often have diminishing returns. Look X-Men made more than X-Men First Class, Spiderman made more than The Amazing Spiderman, Fantastic Four original made more than the reboot. :francis:
 

BillBanneker

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
8,840
Reputation
656
Daps
19,887
Reppin
NULL
Cmon breh, it's a soft reboot at the very least. The avengers roster in the comics rotated with all different characters all the time, sometime they beast on the team instead of hulk for example, but they never just replaced the whole roster all at onec with new people taking up the same mantel as the old ones all simultaneous like this.

They're changing the "mantle" and platform for some characters, but there isn't (as far as we know now) a change of the characters themselves or MCU origin-wise to this point.

Re-booting Tony Stark and Steve Rodgers right after Endgame, good luck finding someone who can fill those shoes and not get any backlash:pachaha:
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
48,834
Reputation
17,560
Daps
251,658
Reppin
Harlem
They're changing the "mantle" and platform for some characters, but there isn't (as far as we know now) a change of the characters themselves or MCU origin-wise to this point.

Re-booting Tony Stark and Steve Rodgers right after Endgame, good luck finding someone who can fill those shoes and not get any backlash:pachaha:
:russ:They did though , they just don't want to call it that. Falcon is rebooted Cap, and Tom Holland is Rebooted Stark.
I just saying dong a full fledged reboot will be better than trying to pull off some force awakens type shyt going forward. That shyt was awful how they tried to disquise a reboot as sequels and the whole trilogy ended up being trash as a result.
 

BillBanneker

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
8,840
Reputation
656
Daps
19,887
Reppin
NULL
:russ:They did though , they just don't want to call it that. Falcon is rebooted Cap, and Tom Holland is Rebooted Stark.
I just saying dong a full fledged reboot will be better than trying to pull off some force awakens type shyt going forward. That shyt was awful how they tried to disquise a reboot as sequels and the whole trilogy ended up being trash as a result.

Not really, no one is confusing Sam for Steve and definitely not peter for Tony. Mantle passing isn't really re-booting, they still exist in the MCU in terms of story. shyt, the Disney + show is still called "Falcon" and the Winter solider.:russ:
 

Luke Cage

Coffee Lover
Supporter
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
48,834
Reputation
17,560
Daps
251,658
Reppin
Harlem
Not really, no one is confusing Sam for Steve and definitely not peter for Tony. Mantle passing isn't really re-booting, they still exist in the MCU in terms of story. shyt, the Disney + show is still called "Falcon" and the Winter solider.:russ:
Thats my point. Mantle passing failed miserably in starwars, they should've just rebooted. MCU making the same mistake.
 

Wally West

Rookie
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
91
Reputation
80
Daps
223
Reppin
Jersey
Alway thought they would use Kang to change the timeline when it was time to change up the actors, but I’m in for them using him to intro the Young Avengers
 

BillBanneker

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
8,840
Reputation
656
Daps
19,887
Reppin
NULL
Thats my point. Mantle passing failed miserably in starwars, they should've just rebooted. MCU making the same mistake.


Nah, you just said that it was re-booting and now you saying they're not:mjgrin: .

But since you're committed to re-booting:


The X-men re-booted too :mjlit: And the Fantastic Four:mjlit:
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,514
Reputation
2,881
Daps
68,947
Reppin
New York


Hmmm . . . Grace is forwarding they might make Kang a descendant of Blue Marvel instead of Reed Richards. And yes, Young Avengers is on the fast track. I guess that is a reboot without throwing out the first 22 movies if you just gonna have young versions s of the Avengers. :mjgrin:
 
Top