I'll say it...kyrie is just as good or better than steph

[Regular_P]

Do you understand how big of a gap that is in NBA years?

You do realize that Kyrie isn't in his prime yet?

Did I say that it wasn't a big gap in NBA years?

 

[jaguar paw]

that's the point of speculating...it's all opinions

you're using homer logic to prop kyrie up over curry....see how easy that was?

I'm not using anything but stats as you can see above.

 

[jaguar paw]

Did I say that it wasn't a big gap in NBA years?

So what's the point of bringing up that he will be 23 in 10 days?

Everything that he's done obviously happened before that will. It still wouldn't change what the value of production at his age is.

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

At 22 years old.

Irving
PER: 21.6
Offensive Rating: 118
Defensive Rating: 109
Usage: 25.7
Win Shares: 8.9
TS%: .58
Real Plus Minus: 8.85

Curry
PER: 19.4
Offensive Rating: 113
Defensive Rating: 112
Usage: 24.4
Win Shares: 6.6
TS%: .59
Real Plus Minus: -.20

Case closed

 

[I.V.]

Curry is a better passer, defender, scorer.

So, Curry.

 

[G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman]

Steph better shooter
Defence is equal
Kyrie better scorer and slight advanteg when it comes to finishing
Steph better court vision


@Blackthoughts
@Malta
@Gil Scott-Heroin


Discuss

Why wasn't this thread made yesterday morning?

 

[Regular_P]

So what's the point of bringing up that he will be 23 in 10 days?

Everything that he's done obviously happened before that will. It still wouldn't change what the value of production at his age is.

I mentioned it because everyone was mentioning Curry turning 27 tomorrow and acting like Kyrie just turned 22.

 

[The War Report]

Now y'all know why LeBron quickly dipped on Miami. Wade was getting and Kyrie was looking real spry.

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

Why wasn't this thread made yesterday morning?

Off course as usual you turn into a sensitive nikka

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

Curry is a better passer, defender, scorer.

So, Curry.

Those are valid pts
But my argument >>>>

 

[I.V.]

Those are valid pts
But my argument >>>>

 

[mastermind]

At 22 years old.

Irving
PER: 21.6
Offensive Rating: 118
Defensive Rating: 109
Usage: 25.7
Win Shares: 8.9
TS%: .58
Real Plus Minus: 8.85

Curry
PER: 19.4
Offensive Rating: 113
Defensive Rating: 112
Usage: 24.4
Win Shares: 6.6
TS%: .59
Real Plus Minus: -.20

thats great.

The problem is Curry is 27 now.

 

[jaguar paw]

thats great.

The problem is Curry is 27 now.

If you read through the thread you'd probably understand why I posted that.

These two should not be compared because they really aren't peers. There is a 4 year gap between them.

For perspective, Kyrie is a better player than what Curry was at 22.

As of today, Curry is a better player.

 

[mastermind]

As of today, Curry is a better player.

which is what matters, today.

 

[jaguar paw]

which is what matters, today.

Not really because it doesn't prove anything.