I'll say it...kyrie is just as good or better than steph

[AkaDemiK]

The Warriors would never trade Curry for Irving but the Cavs would in a heartbeat.

basically...also how many games did the cavs win without bron this season?

 

[jaguar paw]

basically...also how many games did the cavs win without bron this season?

The Golden State Warriors were 36-46 when Curry was 22 years old.

 

[MJ Truth]

Treat him like garbage AFTER he's signed the extension, not before

LeBron ain't even signed his extension yet though. Maybe LeBron got a plan we don't know about.

 

[jfkennedy]

I'll take Kyrie at 22 yrs old over Curry who turns 27 tomorrow

But whose game will age better?

 

[Dr. Narcisse]

Honestly, I feel like these two have the most complete package of jump shot, handles, and finishing ability... Kyrie's a better finisher than Curry but Curry is a better shooter than Irving, but to me they're almost equal players. Given the choice and an empty roster for one season I'd take Steph because he's a much better passer to me and he seems further along mentally, but the fact he's four years older obviously plays a part in that.

Yep. I still think they a bit different though.

Kyrie is a better version of Gilbert Arenas imo. (People forget Gilbert was the shyt) @FAH1223

And he's just 22. So who knows how good he can be in 3 or 4 years. He's just gotta improve as a playmaker.

Steph is a better player today. But Kyrie will eventually be better....just a matter of when (next year? Or 3 to 4 years from now?)

 

[AkaDemiK]

The Golden State Warriors were 36-46 when Curry was 22 years old.

and the cleveland cavaliers would have a worst record than that if bron sat out this season

 

[MeachTheMonster]

The Warriors would never trade Curry for Irving but the Cavs would in a heartbeat.

Says who

 

[NYC Rebel]

Great debate to have....

I love these young players the league now have. This is the best I've seen the NBA since the 80s.

 

[Eternal Tecate]

it was one game breh

 

[jaguar paw]

and the cleveland cavaliers would have a worst record than that if bron sat out this season

1.) You don't know that for a fact. The Cavaliers won 33 games last year with a pretty shytty roster. Every season that Irving has been on the team the record has improved.

2.) You don't know who's on the roster if LeBron decided not to come.

3.) They'd actually be running Blatt's traditional offense.

You're using your personal hatred of the organization to make an argument against what Kyrie has done.

 

[Tommy Sheppard]

I'll take Kyrie at 22 yrs old over Curry who turns 27 tomorrow

can't argue with this

 

[AkaDemiK]

1.) You don't know that for a fact. The Cavaliers won 33 games last year with a pretty shytty roster. Every season that Irving has been on the team the record has improved.

2.) You don't know who's on the roster if LeBron decided not to come.

3.) They'd actually be running Blatt's traditional offense.

You're using your personal hatred of the organization to make an argument against what Kyrie has done.

that's the point of speculating...it's all opinions

you're using homer logic to prop kyrie up over curry....see how easy that was?

 

[42 Monks]

Right now - Curry by a mile

Kyrie's off-ball game is . Curry's a problem because he can fukk you up running the offense, taking over off the dribble, or coming off screens

 

[Kaypain]

Steph is a better PG and Kyrie is the better finisher. ..

I don't think you can go wrong with steph on any team. He produces numbers regardless.

Kyrie still has time to grown into a more complete passing PG

 

[jaguar paw]

At 22 years old.

Irving
PER: 21.6
Offensive Rating: 118
Defensive Rating: 109
Usage: 25.7
Win Shares: 8.9
TS%: .58
Real Plus Minus: 8.85

Curry
PER: 19.4
Offensive Rating: 113
Defensive Rating: 112
Usage: 24.4
Win Shares: 6.6
TS%: .59
Real Plus Minus: -.20