If your little brother is better than you...

[Lakers Offseason]

the 2006 season was how many years ago?

and I would take Peyton any day of the week. Like I said, i'm not gassed off one pass during a game. I'm sticking with the better QB.

So you'd take Peyton if you needed a game winning drive in the playoffs

My work here is done

 

[AkaDemiK]

So you'd take Peyton if you needed a game winning drive in the playoffs

My work here is done

cool

 

[Based Lord Zedd]

So you'd take Peyton if you needed a game winning drive in the playoffs

My work here is done

So all you gonna do in this thread is ignore posts that ask you direct questions, and focus on the ones that allow you to ask this question over and over again.

Then post a bunch of low level football "analysis" and end it with some smileys and GIFs?

 

[Lakers Offseason]

Third, Favre's numbers really aren't better than Montana's.

Yards

1. Brett Favre 71,838 1991-2010 4TM
13. Joe Montana+ 40,551 1979-1994 2TM


TD passes

1. Brett Favre 508 1991-2010 4TM
11. Joe Montana+ 273 1979-1994 2TM



So according to your numbers logic, is Favre that much better?

 

[Lakers Offseason]

So all you gonna do in this thread is ignore posts that ask you direct questions, and focus on the ones that allow you to ask this question over and over again.

Then post a bunch of low level football "analysis" and end it with some smileys and GIFs?

What analysis have you provided other than throwing out Peyton has greater numbers than Eli?

 

[Born2BKing]

So is Terry Bradshaw >> Tom Brady?

 

[Based Lord Zedd]

Yards

1. Brett Favre 71,838 1991-2010 4TM
13. Joe Montana+ 40,551 1979-1994 2TM


TD passes

1. Brett Favre 508 1991-2010 4TM
11. Joe Montana+ 273 1979-1994 2TM



So according to your numbers logic, is Favre that much better?

Montana actually threw touchdowns at a higher rate then Favre. Threw more yards per pass, completed passes more often and threw INTs less often.

Favre played a lot more games. You're comparing their stats as if they played the same amount. Everyone (except you apparently) knows one of the reasons Favre has things like the all time TD record is because of longevity. Favre threw nearly twice as many passes as Montana. It's the reason Manning is on pace to break that record in fewer games, and is on record to do it w/o breaking the alltime INT record (which Favre also holds).

Good job good effort.

 

[Brief Keef]

yall gotta be some of the dumbest nikkas to discuss sports. Lemme guess, Eli's 2 superbowl ring which are TEAM accomplishments makes him a better overall QB than Peyton's one ring. Are we arguing which of their respective teams are better or which QB is better?

So MVP awards and individual #'s mean nothing in this player vs. player argument? Cool.

Robert Horry >>>> Jordan

Going by this dumb ass logic, because it's obvious that SB titles is the only thing the thread starter is going by.

nikkas still don't know how to argue player vs. player. Hilarious.

Eli >>>>> Satan if you put Peyton on the giants on both those SB Drives they lose end of story

 

[Stone]

Eli >>>>> Satan if you put Peyton on the giants on both those SB Drives they lose end of story

If the Patriots catch the ball at the end of the game the Giants lose both times. And Tom Brady goes down as the undisputed goat with 5 Rings and an undefeated season.

See how this works?

 

[Lakers Offseason]

Montana actually threw touchdowns at a higher rate then Favre Threw more yard's per pass, completed passes more often and threw INTs less often.

Favre played a lot more games. You're comparing their stats as if they played the same amount. Everyone (except you apparently) knows one of the reasons Favre has things like the all time TD record is because of longevity. Favre threw nearly twice as many passes as Montana. It's the reason Manning is on pace to break that record in fewer games, and is on record to do it w/o breaking the alltime INT record (which Favre also holds).

Good job good effort.

You can argue the reason why Peyton has much better numbers than Eli is because of the passing offense he plays in, the dome that he played in for a number of years that favored a passing attack thus padding his stats, and the the fact that he played with 2 HOF WRs, All Pro RB in Edge and TE in Clark. Now if you put Eli in these same favorable conditions, you assume that he wouldn't have produced the same numbers as Peyton.

They said the same thing about Brady until they switched his offense to more pass oriented attack and that dude even surpassed Manning in accumulating stupid stats.

So I'm not gonna sit here and hold it against Eli because his offense doesn't dictate him to throw it a shytload of times so he can pad his stats. You guys are easily fooled by that shyt. I prefer to judge a player based on his performance when games really count. And from where I'm standing, Eli >>> Peyton.

 

[Brief Keef]

If the Patriots catch the ball at the end of the game the Giants lose both times. And Tom Brady goes down as the undisputed goat with 5 Rings and an undefeated season.

See how this works?

not really

 

[Stone]

not really

2011 SB
With the Pats driving and up 21-17 late Brady throws to a pass to a wide open Welker which would all but seal the game if Welker catches it. Welker drops it and the rest is history.

2007 SB
Eli throws 2 passes to defenders late in the game. Harrison and Asante drop both potential ints and the Giants go on to score.

If the Patriots make those plays to win the perception is drastically different.

 

[AkaDemiK]

yo @Brief Keef kicks rocks my nikka lol

 

[Based Lord Zedd]

You can argue the reason why Peyton has much better numbers than Eli is because of the passing offense he plays in

No. Especially not considering Manning has played for multiple teams multiple OCs now. And the Giants aren't giving Eli the same amount of control teams give Peyton because he isn't as good.

the dome that he played in for a number of years that favored a passing attack thus padding his stats

Manning just had one of his best years outdoors. Played 1 dome game.

and the the fact that he played with 2 HOF WRs, All Pro RB in Edge and TE in Clark. Now if you put Eli in these same favorable conditions, you assume that he wouldn't have produced the same numbers as Peyton.

Again Manning just had one of his best years with Thomas/Stokley/Decker/Dressen/Tammer/Mcgahee/Moreno. Peyton has proven over his career that he's going to succeed regardless of personnel. This dude was balling with Blair White. There's 0 doubt in my mind Peyton would put up better numbers than Eli does, if he were given the personnel Eli has.

They said the same thing about Brady until they switched his offense to more pass oriented attack and that dude even surpassed Manning in accumulating stupid stats.

And every since they switched that offense Brady has been just as bad in the playoffs as Manning.

So I'm not gonna sit here and hold it against Eli because his offense doesn't dictate him to throw it a shytload of times so he can pad his stats. You guys are easily fooled by that shyt. I prefer to judge a player based on his performance when games really count. And from where I'm standing, Eli >>> Peyton.

LOL at the stupid ass notion that padding stats is a reasoning behind the offense teams run with Peyton. Eli isn't good enough to put up the numbers Peyton does, so he never will regardless of offense.

And you choosing to judge QBs like Eli off an 11 game sample is pretty standard so I can't blame you, but it's the nonsense, shortsighted generic argument dudes like you resort to...so whatever.

 

[MikeBrownsJob]

A lot of false equivalencies. The difference between saying Eli > Peyton vs. Robert Horry over Jordan is that no one is arguing for Robert Horry being the goat of anything.