Eli actually has to carry the G-Men, I don't recall Horry doing more than being clutch. A better comparison would be Marino to Montana.
because this entire bullshyt is based on sb titles.
Who has more rings, jordan or horry?
now u see my point?
yall gotta be some of the dumbest nikkas to discuss sports. Lemme guess, Eli's 2 superbowl ring which are TEAM accomplishments makes him a better overall QB than Peyton's one ring. Are we arguing which of their respective teams are better or which QB is better?
So MVP awards and individual #'s mean nothing in this player vs. player argument? Cool.
Robert Horry >>>> Jordan
Going by this dumb ass logic, because it's obvious that SB titles is the only thing the thread starter is going by.
nikkas still don't know how to argue player vs. player. Hilarious.
No I don't see your point. I see your point as a reach. You're using NBA for one. 2, is Trent better then Marino? No. But once a QB gets to a certain point where you are splitting hairs with stats, SB's count.
Just saying the Horry MJ comparison is weak.
Having said all that, and all jokes aside. Payton is better then Eli.
█ W.D.Y.D. █;2873872 said:Overrated stats for a QB:
QB record
SB wins
Judging players off of team accomplishments, in a game with 53 man rosters is as moronic as it gets.
Of course I saw his performance in both SB games. So this is strictly a SB performance thread? oh, I was confused by the thread title and first post. Eli had two tries to do what he did in the SB, Peyton has one. I don't know what argument your trying to make...but it ain't working.
Also, if you're going to dance around my question, at least come with a better reply than that. I'm talking reg season and post season #'s, does that make it better? either way you know the answer is Peyton. Which is why he is called one of the GOATs and not Eli.
I salute Eli for what he has done, especially since it's against the pats...but be serious now, he can't see Peyton as a QB. If Eli was playing offense and defense while winning those SB rings then you may have an argument, but he wasnt and QB's aren't just rated on the number of rings they have, because like i said..those are team accomplishments.
Eli actually has to carry the G-Men, I don't recall Horry doing more than being clutch. A better comparison would be Marino to Montana.
I used the nba of an example of why team accomplishments should not be used to judge individual talent. Period. Jordan is light years better than horry, but you got stupid nikkas like the thread starter that think more rings = better player.
Who is splitting hairs here? not me. Peyton has accomplishments that Eli can only dream of reaching. Yes Eli has one more sb title, but i'm not arguing which teams are better...dig me? lol
If we were discussing who is better, Peyton or Brady you may have a point. It's fukkin Eli Manning that this nikka is saying is better than Peyton...Eli. Lmfao.
Oh I get it. In your mind, regular season performance >>>>>>>>>>>> playoff performance.
And when he accumulates all those #s in the regular season, it's individual accomplishments. But when he falters in the playoffs, it's his team
because this entire bullshyt is based on sb titles and nothing else, which is a retarded way to judge individual players.
Who has more rings, jordan or horry?
now u see my point?
certain nikkas just shouldn't talk sports, because if you can't understand why this argument is silly then wow. He may be trollin though, but he is duckin his own thread so i doubt it.
Oh I get it. In your mind, regular season performance >>>>>>>>>>>> playoff performance.
And when he accumulates all those #s in the regular season, it's individual accomplishments. But when he falters in the playoffs, it's his team
This nikka trying to compare basketball to football
█ W.D.Y.D. █;2873918 said:The numbers are always considered individual accomplishments.
It's not like Eli's playoff numbers blow Manning's away.