So because I appreciate a better screenplay and superior acting I'm a crackerNo cracker
You should think more highly of yourself Black man
So because I appreciate a better screenplay and superior acting I'm a crackerNo cracker
Cmon, breh...act like theres not a bunch of average to bad movies with high rewatchabilityThe coli tries too hard to be edgy/different. Average films don't have this high of a replayability factor.
I said it's not a masterpiece what do you want from me??Cmon, breh...act like theres not a bunch of average to bad movies with high rewatchability
Being entertaining doesnt mean it was exactly good or great technically
and in it's time, it was INCREDIBLY controversial, for the violence, the language, no character says fukk more than Pacino in Scarface, it was going to be X Rated back in the days of the MPAA vast and real power, and they had to cut it down.
De Palma and Stone were swinging for the fences, and it's clear that 40 years later, it was a worthy effort.
I always say that some minor changes, like the face in cocaine are too much and looks fake, would have been better to just show him cracking open a single kilo and doing some heavy lines. Inhaling that mount of nearly pure cocaine, or even less pure cocaine isn't possible. Even if your tolerance is high, it's the amount that gets into your bloodstream. It would instantly overdose you, like 3 grams of raw right up your nose. The affect was cartoonish and not desperate and sad.
Probably the goat gangster film. Clowns get upset and knock the fact it doesnt have elegant dialogue, or the intricate drama and details of "the life" like Goodfellas or Godfather. This is more true to that era where the crime was a little less than organized. Just a young hot head with a big ego navigating an empire.
You're discussing two different things. Tony is a drug kingpin. It's not really an organized crime situation.