If white people hated blaccs like Malcolm X and wanted blac leaders like MLK..

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,649
Reppin
NULL
..then why did white people kill MLk while Malcolm X was killed by his own?

Easy Answer:

Since MLK was non-violent and whites weren't scared that blacks would gain anything from him but "the right to vote", MLK was more palatable to white people and so (unfortunately) had more of an effect on them. This made MLK ostensibly more scary to white supremacists because he could have more of an effect on whites' conscious.

Malcolm X meanwhile had more of an effect on black people's conscious, which to white supremacists at the time because they didn't think much could come of it anyway (especially after the FBI and other white supremacist organizations infiltrated, divided and all but destroyed Malcolm X's party).
 

@OffHalsted

The 100s LochNess
Joined
Dec 31, 2014
Messages
17,927
Reputation
1,850
Daps
65,460
Reppin
60628
The NOI never mobilized nor made reparations a central tenet to their ideology...just stop the nonsense. And you're analogy is dumb as fukk....the "holes in the bucket" are from the lack of capital...capital is not water, capital is the bucket itself.

Definitely infinitely more intelligent than preaching group economics without addressing the historical capital inequality. You're out of your league.

Addressing: speak to

They spoke on it multiple times..

The bucket still got holes in it:mjlol:thats the problem..
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,375
They spoke on it multiple times..

They spoke on a lot of things that their actions never matched up. There was no NOI version of the PPC. The bucket has holes because capitalism is the issue and anyone who can mobilize people against it like a MLK (not Malcolm) are on borrowed time.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,649
Reppin
NULL
I agree. But there are way more people who shyt on MLK than Malcolm.

This is because MLK deserves to be shyt on more than Malcolm X. White people--and people in general--virtually never give up power, advantage or oppression without force.

And make no mistake: MLK didn't force whites to give blacks *anything* but *basic rights*, which is like throwing black people an apple when blacks are starving before dangling a carrot in front of their faces, while the white man walks around doing his trade, government and economic business.
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,496
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
This is because MLK deserves to be shyt on more than Malcolm X. White people--and people in general--virtually never give up power, advantage or oppression without force.

And make no mistake: MLK didn't force whites to give blacks *anything* but *basic rights*, which is like throwing black people an apple when blacks are starving before dangling a carrot in front of their faces, while the white man walks around doing his trade, government and economic business.

shyt posters like you don't deserve to ever quote me.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,649
Reppin
NULL
They spoke on a lot of things that their actions never matched up. There was no NOI version of the PPC. The bucket has holes because capitalism is the issue and anyone who can mobilize people against it like a MLK (not Malcolm) are on borrowed time.

Just because Malcolm X and the NOI didn't entirely succeed doesn't mean they couldn't have succeeded given better tactics. Your saying Malcolm X or NOI's actions and concepts are worthless is like saying the concept of military fighting is worthless and ineffectual because generals and militaries sometimes lose. Note: ideological guerilla militias like NOI's succeeded in Cuba and militaries have won thousands of battles over the last thousands of years.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,649
Reppin
NULL
shyt posters like you don't deserve to ever quote me.

I'm a shyt post yet you're the one attacking me with ad hominem rather than an actual argument. Go away troll and don't come back until you stop deflecting from the fact you're a fukking idiot (not the mention a c00n).
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,649
Reppin
NULL
The only real post in this thread...

Dumb nikkas always make everything Michael vs Prince..

I see your point but even in this dichotomy, Prince was better than Michael. Prince never kowtowed to white people--in fact Prince is quoted as disliking white people--and Prince always did his best to help blacks. Prince regularly attacked white people openly in his concerts:

Why does Prince take the piss out of white people so much in his o2 concerts?
Thread started 08/09/07 5:40am

sexyAuntyFuka

31626.ava


Why does Prince take the piss out of white people so much in his o2 concerts?

..

Cool concert but it verges on reverse racism..
icon_neutral.gif

Michael Jackson meanwhile bred white man's children, enriched a white woman and tried to become a white man. So even in these celebrities, there is a difference.
 
Top