If white people hated blaccs like Malcolm X and wanted blac leaders like MLK..

NoChillJones

Banned
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
12,915
Reputation
-2,675
Daps
28,520
Love the narrative that MLK who we can all agree was a calculated thinker and doer was the pawn and not the King title he rightfully earned

While Malcolm is garnered a King status even though he was always nothing more then a pawn. And this takes NOTHING away from Malcolm..he was prolific speaker and powerful leader...but his message was never his alone...and his speeches were often dictated by Elijah...his words were often edited by the NOI...for most of his time in the spotlight he was but a mere puppet for NOI...these are facts ladies and gentlemen...

Its like how some will downplay Deray Mckesson as some gay oppotunist even though there is overwhelming proof of the brother putting foot to pavement..organzing protest..rallies..gatherings...for nothing else actually putting his money where his mouth is for what he beleives.....while uplifiting a Tariq Nash or Umar Johnson who are both extremely critical of Deray and BLM but who do nothing but talk about the issues. They are openly critical about whites. Will Boldly tell thier truths in public..but when its all said and done they are just talkers with no action behind thier names....but these are the people the "militant" ones respect.

shyt is redundancy. MLK was able to provide us with a fair chance....and not just him the millions of people who stood up all over America..the sit ins..the marches...the life sacrfices..these peoole went through hell for us essentially the future generations becaise they had the vision to actually see the future...which by the way did not include the unrealistic reality where blacks were dominant and or separate from whites living in a sovereign country inside a country...but blacks obtaining the keys to grow as a people..the key to fair employment and education....those people are owed more then that. But as usual our race gas become spoiled..arrogant..entitled and now we beleive we were/are owed more. But these preaching this aspect arent willing to put foot to pavement...go get the bag so to speak....you see they just want to talk about it...:francis:
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
249,180
Reputation
30,808
Daps
761,652
Reppin
Top 4
Both were merked in their 30s and did more for the black race than y'all and your whole family lineage will every do

Keyboard militants who Pawg and would prob cry and cower and be quiet like a mouse in the 60s talking slick about Martin and Malcolm.
 

@OffHalsted

The 100s LochNess
Joined
Dec 31, 2014
Messages
17,927
Reputation
1,850
Daps
65,460
Reppin
60628
Love the narrative that MLK who we can all agree was a calculated thinker and doer was the pawn and not the King title he rightfully earned

While Malcolm is garnered a King status even though he was always nothing more then a pawn. And this takes NOTHING away from Malcolm..he was prolific speaker and powerful leader...but his message was never his alone...and his speeches were often dictated by Elijah...his words were often edited by the NOI...for most of his time in the spotlight he was but a mere puppet for NOI...these are facts ladies and gentlemen...

The same shyt can be said about MLK:gucci:

Adopted Gandhian principles, plagiarized speeches etc..

If malcolm was a mere puppet for the noi then mlk was a puppet for Council for United Civil Rights Leadership aka the big six.. A group constructed & funded by cacs

To prevent this from occurring, Mr. Stephen Currier promised Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., Whitney Young, and the rest of the “Big Six” a million and a half dollars. This money was to be divided among them, if they would adhere to the government’s script on the “March on Washington.” They selected Mr. Whitney Young as Chairman and Mr. Stephen Currier, a White man was his Co-Chairman.

The government (President Kennedy, his brother Attorney General Robert Kennedy, along with J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI COINTELPRO) told the marchers what time to arrive in D.C., what signs to carry, what songs to sing, what speeches to speak and to all be out of town by sundown. Washington, D.C. on that day was considered a “Sundown Town,” like many other southern towns; meaning all Black African Americans had to be off of the streets by “sundown” or face dire consequences.

These “Civil Rights Leaders” were so totally obedient to the White Man’s script, and mandate, that Congressman John Lewis was ordered by the Whitehouse to rewrite his speech, which he did because it was considered too inflammatory. By the way, how did the White House know the content of the speech(s), unless they were submitted in advance, for prior approval?
 

NoChillJones

Banned
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
12,915
Reputation
-2,675
Daps
28,520
The same shyt can be said about MLK:gucci:

Adopted Gandhian principles, plagiarized speeches etc..

If malcolm was a mere puppet for the noi then mlk was a puppet for Council for United Civil Rights Leadership aka the big six.. A group constructed & funded by cacs

:duck:
 

motion order

Mercenary
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
756
Reputation
-100
Daps
2,011
Reppin
Jew Jersey
Another thread with people telling misinformation half truths and flat out making up stuff about Elijah, Malcolm, Farrakhan, and the Nation of Islam in general
 

yardman

Mad movements!
Joined
Sep 27, 2014
Messages
10,222
Reputation
8,775
Daps
55,845
Reppin
Whitehall
It was a setup reguardless. Before Malcolm got offed he was about to bring up America for genocide and war crimes on the international court/UN along with the fact he was getting buddy buddy with African leaders. Before MLK got offed he was about to come at the U.S. for reparations. It doesn't matter who killed who just know it was by the hands of the same puppeteer.
 
Joined
May 30, 2014
Messages
27,277
Reputation
9,735
Daps
103,631
Reppin
Midwest/East Coast/Tx (Now in Canada)
MLK was a pawn who was discarded of once he outlived his usefulfulness and started freelancing.

Cacs also tried to kill Al Sharpton :whistle:

And Black Lives Matter is damn there ISIS status as far as perception amongst the "make america great again" type cacs (members have been run over with cars and SHOT by cacs)

Based on this line of thinking...Sharpton + the movement these dykes created

90


As well as this fakkit

deray.jpg


Represent a substantial threat in destroying systemic white supremacy...which is why cacs react to Sharpton & BLM with such over the top hyperbole & propaganda as well as occassional violence...right?
BLM is controlled opposition.
 

BmoreGorilla

Veteran
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
38,639
Reputation
29,708
Daps
250,479
Reppin
Man, woman, and child
This is because MLK deserves to be shyt on more than Malcolm X. White people--and people in general--virtually never give up power, advantage or oppression without force.

And make no mistake: MLK didn't force whites to give blacks *anything* but *basic rights*, which is like throwing black people an apple when blacks are starving before dangling a carrot in front of their faces, while the white man walks around doing his trade, government and economic business.
neither one of them deserves to be shyt on :rudy:
 

TTT

All Star
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
2,249
Reputation
460
Daps
5,556
Reppin
NULL
Both were merked in their 30s and did more for the black race than y'all and your whole family lineage will every do

Keyboard militants who Pawg and would prob cry and cower and be quiet like a mouse in the 60s talking slick about Martin and Malcolm.
People view them with a modern day lens where the act of protesting is not difficult because of the changed environment. What MLK was doing then was a subversive act in a country were many people accepted their lot in life. You would be surprised the number of people who just want to keep their head down even when they are oppressed. MLK was disrupting the order and even some black bishops and other community members thought he was "disturbing the peace". The letter from a Birmingham jail and the context in which it was written is evidence enough that many people tend to find a way to adjust to even bad conditions. The problem is that both MLK and Malcom are reduced to binaries, one wants integration the other wants to fight and separate. The analysis pretty much stops there without investigating the underlying reasons why integration was a strategy that MLK saw would work given how laws were structured. White supremacy morphs into many different forms, when outright Klan violence is unacceptable they move on to the next strategy of depriving blacks access to the mainstream economy where they can fund education on a discriminatory basis, or use housing in a manner to divvy up economic opportunities.
 
Joined
May 30, 2014
Messages
27,277
Reputation
9,735
Daps
103,631
Reppin
Midwest/East Coast/Tx (Now in Canada)
neither one of them deserves to be shyt on :rudy:
@Poitier "Malcolm X couldn't shine Martin Luther King's shoes"

Ironically, he probably would have, since Martin Luther King's upbringing was pretty well to do in comparison to brotha Shabazz.
He had a paved way during childhood...and was groomed for leadership.
I respect a champion of the people more...Both are great men.
 

MikelArteta

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
249,180
Reputation
30,808
Daps
761,652
Reppin
Top 4
Amen

There was a time when Martin was in a church surrounded by over 1000 cacs outside who wanted blood

But you have coli negros acting like they were on the front lines

Screenshot_2017-02-24-10-57-07.png



People view them with a modern day lens where the act of protesting is not difficult because of the changed environment. What MLK was doing then was a subversive act in a country were many people accepted their lot in life. You would be surprised the number of people who just want to keep their head down even when they are oppressed. MLK was disrupting the order and even some black bishops and other community members thought he was "disturbing the peace". The letter from a Birmingham jail and the context in which it was written is evidence enough that many people tend to find a way to adjust to even bad conditions. The problem is that both MLK and Malcom are reduced to binaries, one wants integration the other wants to fight and separate. The analysis pretty much stops there without investigating the underlying reasons why integration was a strategy that MLK saw would work given how laws were structured. White supremacy morphs into many different forms, when outright Klan violence is unacceptable they move on to the next strategy of depriving blacks access to the mainstream economy where they can fund education on a discriminatory basis, or use housing in a manner to divvy up economic opportunities.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: TTT
Top