If the Street Fighter series wants to survive should it go back to 2D???

If the Street Fighter series wants to survive should it go back to 2D???

  • Yes it definitely should!!

    Votes: 40 74.1%
  • No!! 2D is a thing of the past

    Votes: 14 25.9%

  • Total voters
    54

Roland Coltrane

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
8,955
Reputation
3,690
Daps
30,204
Reppin
AA GANG
Street Fighter v looks way better than skull girls imo.

I wouldn't mind if the next Sf took the cell-shaded approach like those dragon ball z games

that'd be a risky move

I'm thinking they'd prolly test run it on a lesser game



haven't they been doing cell shading in the Street Fighter v Capcom games for a while now?
 

CarltonJunior

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 21, 2014
Messages
47,285
Reputation
5,603
Daps
131,224
Reppin
Duval County
I always thought 3D meant they could fight in different planes a la Tekken or Virtua fighter as opposed to characters fighting strictly face to face horizontally, what makes Street Fighter 5 3D and when did Street Fighter move to 3D?

sorry if this is a dumb question :francis:

2D is pixel/drawn art. It's two dimensional.

9bgnNzj.gif


3D was made with three dimensional models, the gameplay is across a 2D plane, so only the x and y axis instead of z axis, but the art is still three dimensional.

RaggedLazyBird-size_restricted.gif


To answer the second question they officially went 3D in SF4 but if you count SF EX (not made by Capcom) then that was the first 3D Street Fighter.
 

Roland Coltrane

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
8,955
Reputation
3,690
Daps
30,204
Reppin
AA GANG
:jbhmm:

3D fighters vs 2D fighters - Great Debate


By Lucas Sullivan September 27, 2012Feature

Which fighting format reigns supreme



[paste:font size="5"]Dimensional dispute

missing-image.svg


This match-up sees Justin Towell (1-0-0) battling on behalf of 3D fighters, while Lucas (0-1-0) sings the praises of 2D brawling. Which fighting game sub-genre is better? Its time for the great debate.

Justin says: 3D allows for spectacular environmental traversal
missing-image.svg


Justin: Just look at Dead or Alive 5 as you knock your opponent from the edge of a suspended platform. They dangle precariously before you kick them in the face and they fall, plummeting down into the middle of a car crash (that ends with an explosion of course) before the bout continues on the ground like nothing happened. No 2D game has anything like that in it. It's simply beyond the genre's letterbox play fields.

RECOMMENDED VIDEOS FOR YOU...






Volume 0%























Lucas: Thats all well and good, but in the end, its just a gimmick. Id reckon I get the same amount of excitement watching someone get uppercutted through the ceiling in Mortal Kombat; the payoff (a new backdrop and some extra brutality) is pretty much the same. Id also imagine that those environmental cutscenes go from edge-of-your-seat awesome to flat-out annoying after youve seen them 500+ times.

Lucas says: 2D is more intuitive
missing-image.svg


Lucas: By now, everyone should know the input for a fireball, or how to bust out an anti-air shoryuken. These Street Fighter commands, alongside charge moves, have become universal staples in 2D fighters, and if youre playing a recent one for the first time, you can bet that trying these out will get results. But 3D fighters move lists are either mundane or overly complex, with very little wiggle room between braindead-easy button-plus-direction attacks and absurd, finger-straining movestrings. Its like starting from square one every time you want to try out a new character.

Justin: Quarter-circles are cliquey; 3D fighting control schemes are not. As I pointed out in my editorial about how Virtua Fighter 5: Final Showdown is the best fighting game of this generation, theres nothing more intuitive in the genre than a "block/punch/kick" three button control system. The opportunities for timing and skilful play are the complex bits (which are dependent only on your own imagination), not wrestling with constant blister-baiting quarter-circle or dragon-punch control inputs. 3D fighters remove as many barriers to entry as possible without sacrificing depth--Tekken aside, that usually includes shunning ludicrous movestrings.

Justin says: 3D allows for dodging
missing-image.svg


Justin: Its true that some 2D games have roll moves that give the impression the character has rolled around an attack or their opponent. But in a true 3D ring, that extra dimension of movement yields a wealth of new tactical options. Look at Soulcalibur V, for instance. Sidestepping around a vertical attack is incredibly satisfying. And it doesnt even need to impact intuitive control. Soulcalibur just adds in a horizontal attack button that will catch any side-stepping opponent. Its just a more satisfying and natural-moving fight, not to mention the chance to win by ring-out.

Lucas: This cant be just me: Half the time I try to dodge away from the camera in a 3D fighter, my character interprets my upwards double-tapping as a cue to jump, resulting in a painful chest-stabbing with a massive broadsword. Plus, some moves seem to hit in a wide radius for seemingly no reason, and can or cannot be dodged based on invisible circumstances. Thats just not fun, from either the player or spectator sides.

Lucas says: 2D lets you fight in the air
missing-image.svg



Lucas: When it comes to jumping, nearly every 3D fighter is a complete joke. You either pitifully hop off the ground or float like youre on the moon, and neither leap feels responsive or satisfying. All the air-battling antics are reserved for 2D fighters, where jumping is crucial for creating or closing distance between you and the opponent. Plus, youll never see the kinds of astounding, hundred-hit air juggles of Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 in a landlocked game like Soulcalibur.

Advertisement

Justin: Theres a reason why Virtua Fighter 2s ludicrous jumps arent in the game any more (even though landing an aerial backwards kick in your opponents face was brutally awesome). But that doesnt mean floating combos cant still be amazing. Theres a lot to be said for keeping your opponent airborne for as long as possible in Virtua Fighter, even if your own feet are still firmly planted on the ground. And Kage can toss his opponent high into the sky then catch them on the way down. Thats better than UMvC3s near-infinite tag air combos which make most online bouts no fun at all.

Justin says: 3D animation is better

missing-image.svg



Justin: I admit true 2D games with hand-drawn artwork can look beautiful. But a well-animated 3D game has so much more realism in its movement. At its best, 3D fighting genuinely looks like two real people having a fight. Theres obviously some blurring between genres with the likes of Super Street Fighter IV. Its 3D character models are brilliantly animated. But even that game has a noticeable staccato movement as individual moves play out like a traditional 2D fighter (deliberately for the series own authenticity), without the free-flowing transitions between keyframes of true 3D fighters.


Lucas: Its hard to sell photo-realistic graphics when the physics dont back them up: Characters in Virtua Fighter can soar 40 feet into the air, or bounce a few feet off the ground when bodyslammed. 2D graphics allow for infinitely more flair--bizarre pugilists like Skullgirls Double or BlazBlues Arakune wouldnt look nearly as cool if they were forced to occupy polygonal 3D space. Plus, I dont want to live in a world where every rendered fighter looks like an extra from Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within.


Explore the New Collection[/paste:font]
Retro Influences: Pieces are streamlined and reworked in luxurious textures—from classic cashme...

Shop Now
Sponsored by Vince
cksync.php


info-ayl.png

Lucas says: 2D fighters have a larger aggregate community



missing-image.svg


Advertisement

Lucas: The fact of the matter is, more fighting game players have dedicated themselves to 2D games. That means no disrespect to those dedicated to the 3D fighting scene, but theyve become such an elite (not elitist) group that breaking into the scene as a newcomer can prove nigh-impossible. With that smaller playerbase comes less online discussion, and in turn, less dissemination of new technology, strategies, and combos. Bigger isnt always better, but it speaks volumes that every headlining fighter on the wildly popular Shoryuken homepage is 2D.


Justin: Clever, Lucas! Name-dropping Shoryuken in your argument is a blatant and transparent attempt to garner votes from its community! Well, I think youll find the number of outspoken and active fans of 2D games falls well below the much higher number of gamers who grew up playing Tekken, Soulcalibur and Dead or Alive. Not to mention the equally fierce hardcore Sega fan community who know as well as I do that Virtua Fighter, along with Virtua Racing, kick-started modern, polygonal gaming. 3D FTW.

Justin says: Real 3D fighting can make for a unique experience

missing-image.svg



Justin: 3D fighting games like Virtua Fighter 5 and Soulcalibur V could still arguably be classed as 2.5D due to the way directional inputs are still the same as they would be if the Z-axis were removed. But true 3D fighters like Power Stone allow you to run around with analogue directional inputs, monkey-swinging across the ceiling and even jumping up onto the roof of the stage. Thats beyond 2D fighting games. It may dilute some of the basic "battle of wits" that close-up combat on a 2D plane provides, but in its place comes greater improvisation and imagination.

Lucas: Power Stone is great--but itll never gain traction as a competitive fighting game due to the lack of pinpoint balance that the 2D plane permits. If you want something apart from the norm, try a 2D tag-team fighter or a new mechanic like Street Fighter Alphas -isms. They keep a solid framework and introduce fresh rules, without throwing game balance to the wind in favor of frenetic (albeit fun) item-based chaos.

Lucas says: 2D has the purest space control

missing-image.svg


Advertisement
Lucas: Like chess or go, the highest-level mind games all revolve around space control. Though timing and reflexes come into play, fundamental things like footsies are still all about putting pressure on the opponent by utilizing space. And 2D includes a facet of space that 3D cant seem to muster: projectiles. Chucking fireballs is a feature in most every 2D fighter, and learning how to overcome a projectile spammer is one of 2D fightings great lessons. In 3D fighters, you either brawl up close or not at all (with the exclusion of hella-cheap laser moves), completely omitting an important dimension from the duel.


Justin: Pixel-perfect attack distance still applies in 3D. The extra dimension doesnt change that. But the best 3D fighting games are all about managing the space around you. The original Soulcaliburs 8-way Run feature also has its own specific moveset while youre circling, whether defensive or offensive depending on intuitive forward/backwards motions. Theres also nothing finer than being low on health, realizing youve got your back to the edge of the stage and throwing your opponent over your shoulder and out for the win. As for projectiles why not just bring a gun if youre going to start doing that?

Justin says: 1991

missing-image.svg


Justin: If 2Ds so great, why hasnt anyone significantly improved 2D gameplay over Street Fighter II? In 20 years?

Lucas: Thats like asking why nobodys reinvented the wheel lately.

Lucas says: Ring Outs suck

missing-image.svg


Lucas: Hooray, I forfeited a fight to the death because I tripped off the stage and fell in some ankle-deep water!

Justin: Well if youre dumb enough to fall off a large, mildly elevated platform, you dont deserve to win.

TIME OVER
missing-image.svg


Advertisement
So, who do you side with? Justin and his z-axis sparring, or Lucas and his two-dimensional duels? Answer the poll and comment below to let us know who you think won this Great Debate.
 

Roland Coltrane

Superstar
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
8,955
Reputation
3,690
Daps
30,204
Reppin
AA GANG
why is Fei Long's flame kick so hard to pull off


a reverse dragon punch motion seems fine in theory but while actually playing it's actually pretty counterintuitive and difficult to achieve :francis:
 

TripleAgent

FBA. ZayK
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
34,667
Reputation
4,919
Daps
86,925
Reppin
Baltimore
why's it more expensive?
You have to pay man hours to animators, and stuff has to be partially redone of there are mistakes, additions. A move like a fireball alone will require 20 to 50 frames, all of which are likely unique.

3D models, OTOH, can be manipulated like dolls once they're done. They even can have "skeletons". Also, the 3D model can be made, then several people can animate it, not just the person who drew it. I make Ryu's model. While I move on to Ken, Bob takes the model and starts in the fireball, Rachel starts on the Shoryuken, and James can work on the normals .
 
Last edited:

Sinister

Banned
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,553
Reputation
-2,135
Daps
10,065
*sigh

1. King of Fighters XIII (well XII too) is arguably the best looking 2d graphics in a fighting game ever. I personally prefer the art style that began with King of Fighters 96.

I hate automatic updates that are mandatory. Now people can't go back to the original game

2. Gltches will always exist. With REGULAR people they just don't use them because either

A. The glitches are never going to naturally encountered because the conditions are so specific that hardly anyone will stumble into them

Or

B. People are not a$$holes.

The problem occurs when people go out of their way to exploit them...the. tournaments have to ban them and punish players.

3. Balance is not necessarily fun. Also there is no such thing as absolute balance. SFV is probably the most balanced and least fun Street Fighter out there.

4. Capcom does not really make fighting games anymore and hasn't for years with the exceptions being Ultra Street Fighter II and MVCI. The Street Fighter IV, X Tekken and V games were all developed by Dimps which is a separate company formed by former Capcom and SNK employees. USFII is largely made up of reused assets from Super Street Fighter Ii Turbo hd remix which was made by Backbone entertainment.

Marvel vs Capcom infinite has a lot of recycled elements from Marvel vs Capcom 3 that was made by a company named Eighting

Street Fighter EX series is made by Arika...another developer made up of former Capcom employees.

5. Any game that is graphically 3d but plays 2d is 2.5 d. Anyone opposing that is fiat out wrong.

6. Capcom loves being stingy and greedy

7. Capcom has the resources and assets to make something like Skullgirls but simply won't

Man this thread has gone all over the place
 

TripleAgent

FBA. ZayK
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
34,667
Reputation
4,919
Daps
86,925
Reppin
Baltimore
*sigh

1. King of Fighters XIII (well XII too) is arguably the best looking 2d graphics in a fighting game ever. I personally prefer the art style that began with King of Fighters 96.

I hate automatic updates that are mandatory. Now people can't go back to the original game

2. Gltches will always exist. With REGULAR people they just don't use them because either

A. The glitches are never going to naturally encountered because the conditions are so specific that hardly anyone will stumble into them

Or

B. People are not a$$holes.

The problem occurs when people go out of their way to exploit them...the. tournaments have to ban them and punish players.

3. Balance is not necessarily fun. Also there is no such thing as absolute balance. SFV is probably the most balanced and least fun Street Fighter out there.

4. Capcom does not really make fighting games anymore and hasn't for years with the exceptions being Ultra Street Fighter II and MVCI. The Street Fighter IV, X Tekken and V games were all developed by Dimps which is a separate company formed by former Capcom and SNK employees. USFII is largely made up of reused assets from Super Street Fighter Ii Turbo hd remix which was made by Backbone entertainment.

Marvel vs Capcom infinite has a lot of recycled elements from Marvel vs Capcom 3 that was made by a company named Eighting

Street Fighter EX series is made by Arika...another developer made up of former Capcom employees.

5. Any game that is graphically 3d but plays 2d is 2.5 d. Anyone opposing that is fiat out wrong.

6. Capcom loves being stingy and greedy

7. Capcom has the resources and assets to make something like Skullgirls but simply won't

Man this thread has gone all over the place
100% facts.
 

TripleAgent

FBA. ZayK
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
34,667
Reputation
4,919
Daps
86,925
Reppin
Baltimore
Capcom should just have Arc Systems develop the franchise. Their games look more aesthetically pleasing.
I disagree. I think they should form a new studio and get as many ex-SF2-SF3-MVC2-CVS2 era guys back as possible, even if temporarily. Let them try to recapture some of the old magic. And keep Ono far away from it:scust:
 
Top