No clueWhich masonic lodge is that?
No clueWhich masonic lodge is that?
She has mentioned reparations in every single speech/interview I’ve watched her give. Harris and Booker won’t do that.
I guess only a white candidate can push through a national discourse on reparations
Reading her website, I'm liking what I'm seeing so far. Gonna start spreading the word about her. Something's gotta change, because what we have now is obviously not working.
Facts I'm at the point to where I'm about to introduce her to my immediate family.
Not the cookout invite, breh
I just forwarded her website to my uncle. Gonna get his take on her. He's an oldschool grassroots activist that doesn't fukk around
She seems even keeled and is hitting on a lot of valid points even outside of reparations, and it's not coming off as pandering to me
I think the best way to approach it is to make AAs tax exempt. That's an easier sell to these mutherfukkers and would help us a whole lot. Unfortunately the government ain't about to give up no kinda land. That would honestly be more ideal though.
Agreed. She the only one willing to have this convo which is why Black media picked up on it.I appreciate conversation, and have no problems with those who oppose. The number is low, and we should absolutely press on a much higher number.
I question the motives and biases of some, though. Are those who are shooting her down, and calling her reparations numbers a slap in the face, going to then go out and vote for the politician who isn’t bringing up reparations at all? Or vote for the politician that doesn’t even have a plan?
Just like on the repub side where you’ll have those who vote repub no matter what, that’s also present on the Dem side. We have to be careful with those individuals entering the conversation.
Do you vote?Niccas finna get fooled again. Just watch