Stop breh. Let him liveNo, it's actually "short-sided," which is a golf idiom meaning "attempting a shot, missing, and ending up in a worse predicament than before," which is exactly what you've been doing, idiot.
Stop breh. Let him liveNo, it's actually "short-sided," which is a golf idiom meaning "attempting a shot, missing, and ending up in a worse predicament than before," which is exactly what you've been doing, idiot.
That’s not what that short sided means in golf either. Do you play golf? That means hitting the ball on the side of the green with less “green” space between the your ball and the hole, ie. the short side of the green.No, it's actually "short-sided," which is a golf idiom meaning "attempting a shot, missing, and ending up in a worse predicament than before," which is exactly what you've been doing, idiot.
Except he was wrong again, lol. Y’all are legit idiots on hereStop breh. Let him live
That’s not what that short sided means in golf either. Do you play golf? That means hitting the ball on the side of the green with less “green” space between the your ball and the hole, ie. the short side of the green.
It seems your comment is now your incorrect definition of being “short sided.” The irony, lol
Except he was wrong again, lol. Y’all are legit idiots on here
What you said in the first paragraph is what I said. Short-sided is a description of your positioning, not what you’re trying to make it out to be. A more difficult shot is merely a byproduct of being short-sided… which is explained in what you quoted.Clearly, you haven't played golf, because if you had, you'd know that "short-sided" also refers to hitting a bad golf shot to the side with less green. This leaves you in a more difficult position, making it hard to reach the green.
"The phrase "short-sided" describes a situation where a golfer is in a more difficult position due to the shot placement. In golf, being "short-sided" refers to hitting a shot that lands on the side of the green with less room to work with, often leaving a difficult approach or recovery shot. This can make it challenging to get the ball close to the hole, as there’s limited space between the ball and the flagstick, often with a bunker or rough in between."
First off, what does short-sided mean?
It's when you've missed the green with your approach shot and are left with a pitch with little green between you and the hole compared to other spots around the green. You've heard of a "good miss." Well, the short-sided approach is the polar opposite of that.
The shot you hit after short-siding yourself can determine how bad -- or limited -- the damage will be on your scorecard."
https://www.pga.com/archive/golf-in...igate-your-pitch-shots-when-youre-short-sided
Keep doubling down on your sheer stupidity.
What you said in the first paragraph is what I said.
No, it's actually "short-sided," which is a golf idiom meaning "attempting a shot, missing, and ending up in a worse predicament than before," which is exactly what you've been doing, idiot.
Short-sided is a description of your positioning, not what you’re trying to make it out to be.
You keep trying to save yourself from your mistake and it’s not working. Short sided as a golf term is never used to describe someone’s thoughts or comments.
I have never used that term outside of golf, and as I said before, it’s used to describe where you hit the ball, as in the short side of the green.And you're just regurgitating my original statement on "short-sided" with random information you just searched up about Golf.
Short-sided is also used as an idiomatic expression, something you also clearly know nothing about
You keep grasping for straws trying to be right, but I've already embarrassed & proven you wrong numerous times with facts that you can't refute.
"Short-sided" is a specific term used in golf (and sometimes metaphorically in other contexts) to describe a situation where a person is at a disadvantage due to their position or decision. It refers to hitting a shot that leaves the ball on the side of the green with less space to work with, making the next shot more difficult."
Your turn
Congress provided $38 million in reparations in 1948 and forty years later paid an additional $20,000 to each surviving individual who had been detained in the camps.Can you show where Japanese and Native Americans got reparations. I don't mean lawsuits, I mean bills from congress that provided cash payments. You keep saying the shyt, well provide evidence.
Japanese American Incarceration | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
At the time of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, about 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestry lived on the US mainland, mostly along the Pacific Coast. About two thirds were full citizens, born and raised in the United States. Following the Pearl Harbor attack, however, a wave of...www.nationalww2museum.org
Congress provided $38 million in reparations in 1948 and forty years later paid an additional $20,000 to each surviving individual who had been detained in the camps.
After World War II, the Indian Claims Commission paid a total of $1.3 billion in reparations to Native Americans. This amount provided only $1000 per individual and offered little overall benefit.
U.S. finalizes $3.4 billion settlement with American Indians
The missing funds at the center of the class-action case involve what are called Individual Indian Money accounts, which are supposed to represent the property of individual Indians. The accounts are held by the United States as trustee.
So the US is even managing their money for them, as individual accounts.
Not hard to find on google.
The only reason Shills can give for actively undermining Reparations. Is they're afraid it will make white people mad? Talk about c00ning.
The United States pays reparations every day—just not to Black America
The United States pays reparations every day—just not to Black America
Cornell William Brooks and Linda Bilmes explore the issue of restorative justice for the multifaceted, intergenerational harms Black Americans have suffered.www.hks.harvard.edu
The United States Has Paid Reparations for a Host of Issues. Why not Slavery?
The United States pays reparations every day—just not to Black America
Cornell William Brooks and Linda Bilmes explore the issue of restorative justice for the multifaceted, intergenerational harms Black Americans have suffered.www.hks.harvard.edu
Cori Bush is a full-bore clown & if she was truly serious about garnering support for reparations, Bush would've/should've spoke about reparations long before releasing her H. Res. 414. in May 2023.
Cori is more serious about reparations than you are.
Nonsense clown. I've discussed "reparations" on this site more than Cori Bush has her entire political career.