O³ (O cubed)
No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Nah. The price of the Series S Brazil went up. For a little bit more you can buy a PS5 digital
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...IQFnoECAoQAg&usg=AOvVaw2ZLlN_r64ZhNWumw-KQIUF
I admit, I was wrong about the Xbox Series S.
- Thread starter The Mad Titan
- Start date
https://www.google.com/url?q=https:...IQFnoECAoQAg&usg=AOvVaw2ZLlN_r64ZhNWumw-KQIUF
Diondon
Thanks to the lawyers uh, I marbled the foyer
SMH
can we just hand out the 2023 WOAT now?
Why you keep trying to give me WOAT status breh.can we just hand out the 2023 WOAT now?
Is this article incorrect somehow?
“Microsoft now offering developers more flexibility on how games ship on the Xbox Series X|S platform, hopefully, issues like the one we saw with Baldur's Gate 3 over the summer will be an exception.”
But there is no parity clause…
But there is no parity clause…
So as it turns out, the Xbox series S is not only a value to consumers its a value to all gamers.
A few of us here have said this would be the case and now you are starting to hear about the after effects.
It's time to admit that Microsoft was right about the Xbox Series S — here's why
8K UUHD with path tracing at 5000 FPS is great, but what if you only have $300?www.windowscentral.com
@MeachTheMonster and @Pressure are two other folks who have direct or indirectly mentioned theae kind of affects.
No it’s not a value to all gamers. The fact that it gets consistently outsold by PS5 skus and the Switch are a testament to the fact that the gaming community as a whole could do without it. They used the honeypot of a much lower price and it still wasn’t enough to buy them the customers to outsell much more expensive devices and much weaker devices.
The only thing it does is make Xbox look a little better because without its sales they’d likely be in a far more distant 3rd place. That’s more an incitement on their studios output than any real value because the PS5 proves more people would willingly pay a higher price for actual perceived value.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
We should have known this thing was DOA when the series x and ps5 was non-existent for two years due to teh chip shortage and these things still weren’t selling.
Also to answer the question the author of that article posed if I only had $300 I’d be looking at used digital PS5s over a Series S. It might cost a bit north of $300 but no way is hell would a Series S be my only console.
On Facebook Marketplace you can easily get a digital PS5 for close to $300.
On Facebook Marketplace you can easily get a digital PS5 for close to $300.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
James Ryan is owed an apology
It is a value to all gamers when every platform reaps the benefit of the optimization that goes into the series S.
It's also a value to those who want the most gaming bang for their buck.
It's really that simple.
As far as sales and value go, it's pretty clear that value straight up doesn't matter when a brand gets popular enough.
Black Mamba
Superstar
Piece of shyt console with a even bigger turd
The reality is the Series S is a half measure made available at a dirt cheap price. Xbox stans shouldn't be point at a device that caused them to lose release parity on the PS5 with a GOTY candidate as a win.
Microsoft thought they could make this cheap console and have it do numbers. The real lesson learned is people will pay more for something they perceive value in. Far inferior hardware on an almost 7 year old Nintendo console can outsell it and the PS5 that's $100-$200 more can outsell it. They should have been focused on correcting their software output not putting out a weak SKU that fragments their customer base.
Similar threads
