He ain't Baldwin.
I think he's a strong writer, both poetic
and convincing. I think the fact that he can actually get White people to seriously discuss what are extremely radical positions for White people is a GOOD thing.
I mean, before Ta-Nehisi Coates, how often did you hear even liberal Whites talking bout reparations?
It was always some, "Oh, I see how they may deserve it, but it isn't politically feasible and we need to move past that .
"
Now you actually got people like, "This man Ta-Nehisi has led me to believe that I must change my position on this issue.
"
I ain't saying that ALL Black intellectuals should be like that, or that it makes him the "best" one. But it's a lane that needed to be occupied, and he's done it well.
He moved to France, is learning the language, and basically said racism is an American thing and does not exist in France.
Can you give receipts on the France thing? As I understand it, French racism IS a lot different from American racism, more nationalist/xenophobic than skin-color based. Which makes sense given their history - they haven't had a large "native" Black population like America has, their Black residents were seen as Africans even when they were 2nd and 3rd generation, so they chose to express racism via nativism rather than colorism. That made Paris a different environment for Western Black intellectuals than America was.
I ain't never been to France and don't hardly know anyone who spent time there, I'm just based this on some of what I've read of history and current events, so I'm willing to be shown wrong.