How will Joe Biden GOVERN? General Biden Administration F**kery Thread

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,691
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
618,132
Reppin
The Deep State

What Happened to The “Border Crisis”? The Sudden Shift in The Media’s Obsession With Migration, and Kamala Harris’s Coming Triumph
Spandan ChakrabartiApril 18, 2021

At the time President Biden tapped Vice President Harris to head the administration’s efforts to address the root causes of migration in response to the surge of unaccompanied children at the southern border, the media’s cage-rattling about what they called the “border crisis” had hit a crescendo.

On March 23, an Axios report showed that the volume of online stories from top sources had outstripped stories about coronavirus vaccination by nearly 2-to-1, demonstrating how the media can ignore an actual crisis and manufacture an entirely new one. On March 24, Biden put Harris in charge.

Republican politicians and Conservative and “mainstream” media panned Biden’s decision to charge Harris with this responsibility as a dangerous mistake of assigning a serious border portfolio to who they portray as a border neophyte.

The New York Post editorial board lamented that putting Harris in charge proved that Biden didn’t take the border seriously because as Attorney General of California, Harris implemented policies preventing state law enforcement from detaining people in California on federal immigration requests in the absence of a warrant duly issued by a court.

Politico, master of clickbait, accused the President of setting up his own Vice President to fail, saying Biden had handed Harris a “political grenade,” though much of the article they ran under that headline carefully hedged their bets.

Suffice it to say, the media, at the behest of the Trumpian right, was rooting for the Vice President to fail.

But it’s not working out that way. In the past week and a half, Harris and the Biden administration appear to have been able to seed a multilateral response to the migrant surge, including Harris’s core mission, addressing the root causes such as poverty and trafficking.

Perhaps that explains the sudden shift in the media’s mood when it comes to this issue. After incessantly dramatizing the border almost since the beginning of the Biden administration, media interest in it appears to have suddenly receded. Migration or the border is no longer headlining the Sunday news shows today, after weeks of breathless, drama-filled coverage. ABC’s This Week flew an entire set to the border (because you know, it’s dangerous there) in late March, for example, but the urge for another hit of that drug appears to have vanished. Heck, migration didn’t even make it into the promos for the Sunday shows, including for Fox News Sunday.

I have a theory as to why: Harris is on a path to success, and they don’t want to lose credibility by betting against her.

News surfaced on Monday that Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras would deploy additional troops, some at their borders with each other, some throughout their countries, and some at the US-Mexico border, to help stem the tide of immigration caravans. Guatemalan forces have already been breaking up caravans moving through the country to their border with Mexico.

The Mexican, Guatemalan, and Honduran troops will not just break up moving migrant caravans through their own borders and into the United States, they will also fight cartels and human traffickers, as well as provide services to migrants. This development comes on the heels of a phone call between Harris and Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador on April 7, which both the US and Mexican sides said included broad agreement on rendering humanitarian aid and fighting trafficking.

By the end of last week, Mexico had taken even more decisive action to make sure that stemming the flow of migrants doesn’t just mean that innocent children get to suffer in other countries. President Obrador announced that in addition to the 10,000 troops the country has committed to stem the migration flow, the director of Mexico’s child and families protection agency was moving to the Mexico’s southern border with Guatemala, signifying the Mexican government’s impetus to protect and provide services for migrant children.


Harris's fingerprints are all over this. To understand how, we need to delve a little into the Vice President's days as the chief law enforcement officer of the state of California.

Transnational organized crime that makes victims of migrants was a specialty of Kamala Harris’s when she led the largest state Department of Justice in the United States as the Attorney General of the State of California. For some reason, most media outlets appear either unaware of it or do not think it important to mention in the context of Harris’s role at the top of the administration’s response to the border.

Harris has never had any qualms about dealing with gangs and other forms of organized crime harshly and to the fullest extent of the law. From her first year as Attorney General to her last, she busted up gangs, took their guns, money, and drugs, and locked them up. She issued an extensive report on cross border organized crime, titled ‘Gangs Beyond Borders’, and when the California legislature eliminated money in the state budget for a gang task force used to fight transnational gangs, Harris fought her own party in the legislature to get it back.

Harris was an effective crime-fighter, but she knew that on cross-border organized crime, going it alone wouldn't be enough. That's why even as a state official, she sought out an ambitious, international role. In 2014, she enlisted other states and worked with Mexico to establish a binational working group to target, find, and prosecute money laundering on both sides of the southern border.

In California, Harris’s role on the issues of immigration wasn’t limited to busting gangs, either. She used her office to protect immigrant communities just as much as she used it to bust up transnational gangs. Before California had become the country’s first sanctuary state, Harris used her office to issue a bulletin to local law enforcement agencies noting that compliance ICE detainer requests - as opposed to warrants issued by a court - is discretionary.

And when she arrived in the US Senate, Harris used her time in the minority to take on a large immigration portfolio that included championing immigration reform and DACA recipients, and making Trump appointees very, very uncomfortable in their witness chairs.

The Vice President is not a neophyte on the border; in fact, she is likely more versed, experienced, knowledgeable, and practical about these issues than most people who discount her.


It is abundantly clear that this is why Biden picked Harris to head the effort to address root causes of migration. Harris is familiar with the humanitarian issues at the border, she is a fearless advocate for immigrant communities, she does not wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to getting tough on traffickers, and she has existing relationships on these exact issues with law enforcement on the US side and the government in Mexico.

Republicans believe that border policy is an area where the Biden administration is vulnerable; perhaps the only area where they truly believe Biden is vulnerable. They are hoping to make Kamala Harris the face of that perceived vulnerability, in hopes of dooming her prospects of running for president in the future.

But in doing so, they are running a risk: betting against a meticulously prepared leader who is known for turning perceived vulnerabilities into strengths. If that materializes to be the case here - when that materializes to be the case here - the cynical right wing bet is set to go up in flames.

Nothing would be more satisfying.

Like what you read? Leave a Tip.
Fund the Fight
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,691
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
618,132
Reppin
The Deep State

Leftists Didn't Get Biden Wrong. They LIED About Him.
Spandan ChakrabartiApril 15, 2021
Donald Trump did for the spread of COVID, that “no one could have predicted” that Biden would turn out to be a progressive president, that his lean-in economic progressivism is a surprise, and that they made him do it.

I, too, have a new message: they’re full of it.
SHOT: THE BIG LOSERS.

I am old enough to remember a February morning in 2020 when the socialist writer Anand Giridharadas appeared on television with MSNBC’s Joy Reid, with the topic of conversation focusing on just what was turning so many Democrats to a populist socialist candidate like Bernie Sanders. Sanders, who was swimming in campaign cash, was riding high at the time from performing well in Iowa (where he still lost), New Hampshire, and Nevada, and his supporters were crowing about how quickly - not whether - he would clinch the Democratic nomination for president and make the rest of us "bend the knee".

A smug Giridharadas then declared that the “mass movement” Bernie Sanders was leading was so historic that it was messing up people’s ‘mental models’ as the ‘establishment’ - read Joe Biden and his allies - was in disarray in their desperate attempts to stop the renaissance man, Bernie Sanders.

Unfortunately for Sanders and Giridharadas, the thing that was happening then was much simpler than a mass movement taking the establishment by storm: Black voters hadn’t voted in significant numbers yet, and Bernie Sanders, ever the candidate of white grievance and low-participation elections, was doing well among ultra-white electorates and undemocratic caucuses. Additionally, the Democratic pragmatic majority was divided among too many candidates, while Bernie Sanders was taking advantage of a relatively unified ideologue wing.

Once the pragmatic middle coalesced around Biden after his huge win in South Carolina, though, the rest of the primary contest fell like dominos, and Sanders won fewer pledged delegates, earned fewer popular votes, and dropped out earlier in the cycle in 2020 than he had in 2016.

Many pro-Bernie leftists and their media allies then spent the rest of the year lamenting that Biden would lose to Trump because he was too timid and weak, in keeping with their primary-season mantra that “only Bernie” could defeat Trump. Former Sanders campaign co-chair Nina Turner even compared voting for Biden to eating a turd sandwich.

Biden would, however, go on to win the presidency by proudly brandishing his anti-socialist credentials, earning an unprecedented 81.2 million votes while he was at it. The fundamentalist left’s deep antipathy towards Kamala Harris could not keep her from becoming the first Black, Asian, and woman Vice President, either.

Even after Biden won the presidency, they kept up the naysaying and hounding during the transition, pummeling the then-President-elect for failing to nominate leftist sycophants to prominent positions in his upcoming administration.

Despite it all, now that President Biden is implementing the policies he laid out during the campaign and brocialists tried to claim he did not really believe in, they find themselves between a rock and a hard place: do they keep whipping up outrage among an increasingly small, fringe group of political activists against a president who enjoys a 95% approval rating among Democrats, or do they try to become relevant and somewhat mainstream? When you get this much wrong in this short a period of time, attempting to rebrand yourself as a surprised moose isn’t exactly… well, a surprise.
CHASER: THE STRUGGLE FOR RELEVANCE

And so the same Giridharadas who tried to sell a national audience a little over a year ago that people are just fed up with traditional liberalism and a revolution of radical proportion was upon us has now penned a column in The Atlantic claiming that he and others on the socialist left simply got Joe Biden wrong, expressing astonishment at Biden’s forward-thinking presidency.

Giridharadas wasn’t the only personality to get the narrative of the 2020 election and the impending Biden presidency devastatingly wrong. In fairness, the vast majority of the mainstream press as well as the entire far-left intelligentsia was on the same boat. The New York Times recently ran an article in the same vein, claiming that Democrats did not fall in love with Biden until he became president and started acting like a popular liberal lion despite the fact that not only did Biden earn 81.2 million votes in the general election but that the 19 million votes he earned in the primary outpaced even President Obama and Hillary Clinton from their electrified 2008 primary.

None of the new narratives adds up.

As I have noted above, Joe Biden isn’t doing anything as president he hadn’t promised during his campaign. Anyone who bothered to listen to candidate Biden or read his detailed policy positions on his campaign website knew that Joe Biden was running, as he said, to be the most progressive president in history. He promised an ambitious climate agenda beginning with rejoining the Paris Climate Accord, an aggressive health care agenda to expand access and improve affordability by building on Obamacare, a committed plan to rebuild America’s infrastructure, a swift turnaround in public health and COVID vaccination strategy, a resurgent, principled American foreign policy aimed at tackling the challenges of the future, and a relentless focus on equity for the underprivileged and the underserved.

Joe Biden’s policy agenda was always transformative.

But what about his past record, which leftist pundits say they based most of their very, very wrong predictions of a Biden presidency on?

If there was one thing the leftists misrepresented more than Joe Biden’s policy positions during the 2020 campaign, it was his record. Sure, Biden’s record as a Senator and Vice President wasn’t spotless, but it was deeply and widely progressive.

Giridharadas, defensive of his and his allies’ enmity toward Biden, begins with Biden’s supposed friendliness to credit card companies, his vote for the Iraq war, and his eulogizing of Strom Thurmond, who was at one point a segregationist. Giridharadas does not mention, however, that Thurmond's views would change in later years and he would become the first member of the South Carolina congressional delegation to appoint African Americans to his staff.

Giridharadas also does not mention that his preferred candidate and movement leader fails more progressive policy tests than any other politician of his national stature. Bernie Sanders spent most of his Congressional career as a friend of the National Rifle Association, voting against background checks and for special immunity for the gun industry. Sanders also appeared on Lou Dobbs’ television show in the mid-2000s to brandish his opposition to immigration reform on the ground that immigrants depress American wages, and he tried to dump Vermont’s nuclear waste near a predominantly Latino Texas town while his wife sat on the Board of the Texas authority responsible for clearing the dumping.

By contrast, Biden was a progressive's progressive.

While in the Senate, Joe Biden earned consistent high marks from organizations that support liberal causes and consistent low marks from right wing organizations. Biden was the architect of the Violence Against Women Act, a top leader in the fight against assault weapons during the Clinton administration, a key player in enacting the Americans with Disabilities Act, and an enthusiastic champion of Clinton and Obama tax increases on the rich, of the Children’s Health Insurance Program led by Hillary Clinton, and of course, health care reform during the Obama administration.

Joe Biden wrote the first ever bill to address climate change, long before it became fashionable to hold “Green New Deal'' die-ins. Joe Biden has been an ally to organized labor his entire career. Joe Biden led President Obama himself when it came to declaring public support for marriage equality. Joe Biden’s leadership as Vice President culminated in one of the Obama administration’s crowning bipartisan achievements in Congress, the 21st Century Cures Act containing a cancer moonshot named after Biden’s late son, Beau.

For anyone who examined Biden’s past, observed his political progress, and poured over his plans as a candidate for president, President Biden’s governing posture as a competent, visionary, progressive leader should come as no shock. Joe Biden is not a different kind of president than who he was as a senator and vice president. He is exactly who he has been his entire political life.

As we can see, it is not the consistency of the President, then, that is in question, but rather, the consistency of his critics, especially those from the ideological left. In order to believe their feigned surprise is genuine, one would have to believe that they are either indomitably stupid or wholly ignorant, and neither fits.

People like Giridharadas appear capable of cherry picking things out of context from Biden’s record to a degree that requires sophisticated and intelligently devious parsing, so we can rest assured that neither a lack of intelligence or a lack of knowledge is the true reason they got Joe Biden so wrong.

Here’s a simpler and much more likely explanation: they lied. Simply lied. They knew who Biden had been, what positions he took during the campaign, and what kind of leader he would be should he become president, and they unapologetically lied about all of it.

They lied because it helped protect the lie that their Great White Knight, Bernie Sanders, was the man made for this moment. They lied because they refused to acknowledge then, as they do now, that the mainstream Democratic party - not the far-left antagonists that made Bernie Sanders their cause celeb - has been the only force in American politics to take up the cause of the underprivileged and underrepresented. They lied because it helped distract from their dear leader's dismal legislative record.
They lied because it fueled their own big lie: that the Democratic “establishment” undermined Sanders and pushed first Clinton and then Biden because they didn’t want any real change.

Leftists didn’t get Joe Biden wrong. They deliberately and cunningly LIED about him.
 
Last edited:
Top