How is LeBron James the GOAT and he's never been apart of a dynasty ?????EDIT: Thread very Quiet

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,773
Reputation
-501
Daps
21,880
Who builds the dynasty? And how long are great player required to stay in situations that show minimal to no traction towards being perennial contenders?

I would like you to answer these questions, please. Because hopefully, if you're an honest person, you see how subjective any answer to them are. There's no line on how long guys owe the team to build the optimal roster for them. You could put a number on it and 10 other people could have a different length of time, what makes yours or mine or anyone else's opinion the right answer?
Once a player proves to be generationally great and has not only the physical but also the mental fortitude to endure and battle through the competition then the potential of a dynasty takes form, chemistry develops at an all time high, teammates start believing and playing to make history.

The Lebron led Cavs in 2009 and 2010 won 60+ regular season games and then flamed out in the playoffs so they did have traction but Lebron doesn’t have the mental fortitude to go with his physical gifts. MJ got beat year after year by Detroit but kept coming back for more until the flood gates opened.
 

Jerz-2

GOATs Status
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
14,937
Reputation
4,678
Daps
54,720
1836064682.0.jpg
Wait, not the goggles....did they really uncork the champagne celebration after winning that shyt? :mjlol:

Haven't they had a losing record since then?
Like, 4-9 or some shyt?

Hope that celebration was worth it.
 

FlyRy

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
30,671
Reputation
3,100
Daps
62,138
There is no legitimate case for Kobe as GOAT. Or BOAT or whatever term you wanna use:

•he didn't come in tearing The League up instantly (Mike, Bron, Bird, Kareem, Wilt, Duncan, Shaq all did)
•his game as a #1 only translated to two championships and four Finals runs, which in and of itself is outstanding, but that's not GOAT production as a #1
•he won most, 3 outta 5, of his rings as a #2. Nobody else in the conversation won MOST of their rings as a #2, and let's be honest, if he was That Guy on a "man this the best I ever seen level", he wasn't ever have been anyone's #2. His game would've outright proven he was the best player on championship teams, there would be no 1a/1b qualifiers between he abd Shaq

•his postseason resume really isn't that great. A bunch of lesser players have better postseason resumes---->Kawhi has a much more consistent record of tearing thru shyt in the playoffs than Kobe, but is obviously a lesser player than Kobe historically. Kawhi isn't the only one either
•his best Finals performance came vs a Magic team that wasn't ready for that stage. Not a ringing endorsement for a player who's the greatest ever, when your teammate put up more consistently dominant performances (Shaq) at that round, you were not the best player in either series vs the rival C's, etc.

I can keeping going. There is no objective reason to call Kobe the greatest ever---->though subjectively it satisfies the senses, and agendas, to say he was the "closest thing to Mike"....

And therein is the root problem, you nikkas watch basketball comparing nikkas to Mike. I watch basketball comparing great players to the collective standard of All-Time greatness...
Where's this fourth finals run of Kobe's as a #1 that I don't remember? 08-10. Three.

Saw this today too
FB-IMG-1705114181880.jpg
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
15,133
Reputation
2,275
Daps
71,877
Reppin
NULL
This doesn't make sense bc if you put Jordan on the cavs instead of the wizards and given him any other coach aside from Phil Jackson the outcome is different..

You speak of a dynasty as if Jordan drafted the whole bulls team, hired the coach and trainers and developed players and came up with the plays.

Once again a dynasty is a function of a complete organization - not a single player. Which makes Op's question null and void

The Bulls were the Cavs in the 1980s. Phil wasn't Phil either. Just some 6"8 goofy white boy that acted like Steve Jobs.

Jordan made the Bulls. The Bulls didn't make Jordan.
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,417
Reputation
12,801
Daps
91,506
Reppin
CHICAGO
Last edited:

JP_614

Superstar
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
16,309
Reputation
3,179
Daps
32,824
Reppin
Aloha State
The Bulls were the Cavs in the 1980s. Phil wasn't Phil either. Just some 6"8 goofy white boy that acted like Steve Jobs.

Jordan made the Bulls. The Bulls didn't make Jordan.
I’m pretty sure if he didn’t have Jerry Krause making moves he wouldn’t be in the position he was in. Yall acting like hes LeGM :troll:. I’m pretty sure if Jordan didnt have Phil they wouldn’t have the triangle offense that Tex winter was preaching. MJ is a great player but stop acting like he didn’t have the best of the best going against weaker opposition.
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,644
Reputation
6,253
Daps
45,410
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
Where's this fourth finals run of Kobe's as a #1 that I don't remember? 08-10. Three.

Saw this today too
FB-IMG-1705114181880.jpg
I think he was the best player on the '04 Lakers who choked to Detroit...

But this graphic is correct in its premise...

Kobe had 15 playoff appearances, averaged 30 4x. One of those times was a Rd1 out so you almost can't even count that...

Out of 7 Finals appearances, only one of those runs did he average 30, 2008...

In 16 playoff runs, Bron averaged 30 6x, including his very first playoff run. 4 of his 10 Finals runs, he had a 30pt playoff average...

There's a clear gap in, who scores more the longer the postseason wears on. And its objective, not hypothetical shyt. The gap widens when we add Finals-only scoring, and widens more when we look at scoring vs elite defenses faced in the playoffs...

I watched both these nikkas whole careers. So did everyone else but too many of these guys base their basketball views on who can win a cone drill or who has the prettiest game in an empty gym 🤣 show me the guy who was better vs elite defense in the playoffs, show me the guy who was better in the later rounds of the playoffs, and I'll show you the better basketball player...

It's never gonna be the guy who scores less vs tougher comp or scores less in later rounds...

I'm a Kobe fan, always have been, always will be. He was not a better basketball player than LeBron, and the widely held notion that he was a better scorer than LeBron, really doesn't hold up under scrutiny, you gotta view it with surface binoculars to maintain that position...
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,773
Reputation
-501
Daps
21,880
I think he was the best player on the '04 Lakers who choked to Detroit...

But this graphic is correct in its premise...

Kobe had 15 playoff appearances, averaged 30 4x. One of those times was a Rd1 out so you almost can't even count that...

Out of 7 Finals appearances, only one of those runs did he average 30, 2008...

In 16 playoff runs, Bron averaged 30 6x, including his very first playoff run. 4 of his 10 Finals runs, he had a 30pt playoff average...

There's a clear gap in, who scores more the longer the postseason wears on. And its objective, not hypothetical shyt. The gap widens when we add Finals-only scoring, and widens more when we look at scoring vs elite defenses faced in the playoffs...

I watched both these nikkas whole careers. So did everyone else but too many of these guys base their basketball views on who can win a cone drill or who has the prettiest game in an empty gym 🤣 show me the guy who was better vs elite defense in the playoffs, show me the guy who was better in the later rounds of the playoffs, and I'll show you the better basketball player...

It's never gonna be the guy who scores less vs tougher comp or scores less in later rounds...

I'm a Kobe fan, always have been, always will be. He was not a better basketball player than LeBron, and the widely held notion that he was a better scorer than LeBron, really doesn't hold up under scrutiny, you gotta view it with surface binoculars to maintain that position...
Who cares if a player scores 30+ or score more during a playoff run, you are majoring in the minors. What’s important is the impact of the scoring, did it lead to the chip which is the ultimate end goal.

Lebron and Kobe not only played different positions but also played in different offensive systems with different responsibilities on the court so I’m not sure why you comparing irrelevant playoff scoring stats.

Kobe‘a impact on his team led to him winning 5 chips period. y’all Bron stans want to bring up Shaq but not realize that Bron forming super teams to chase easy rings is worse considering that he still only got 4 and lost 6.
 
Top