How is LeBron James the GOAT and he's never been apart of a dynasty ?????EDIT: Thread very Quiet

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,695
Reputation
-546
Daps
21,639
There's nothing objective to state Kobe was the best player ever, not entertaining that. And I'm not doing no a/B cop out shyt...

Being drafted to trash teams isn't unique. What LeBron made from that start to his career is. Unless guys drafted to trash teams just win 4 MVPs and 4 rings all the time. You know something I don't know?

If we're gonna talk Finals record the relevance is in what happened each Finals, not broadbrushing it. We've been down this road before, you have a thing about Finals record that I simply don't care about...
Lebron is a great player, no one can deny this. According to you Lebron is the goat cause he got drafted to a trash team went on to win 4 MVPs and 4 rings, very impressive.

The only problem is the original #23 got drafted to a trash team and went on to win 5 MVPs and 6 rings, led a dynasty with 2 3-peats, led a 72-10 team to a chip, perfect record in the finals with no game 7. Didn’t lose 3 games in a row from like 1991-1998 when he played.

Kobe was the best player of his era 2000-2010. He won the most rings, scored the most points, avg the highest ppg, was the best defender at his position for the entire decade. Was the best offensive player in the league for that decade. Had the toughest path through the playoffs. Rescued the Lebron led Olympic team from collecting more Ls. Forced DWade to call up Lebron and form the Heatles with Chris Bosh. Kobe is the 1b boat. He is not the goat because that encompasses media awarded subjective awards, narratives and agendas.
 
Last edited:

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,695
Reputation
-546
Daps
21,639
It’s not unique, but Mike & Steph was atleast drafted to trash teams that actually tried to get better and gave a serious fukk.

Bron didn’t have that from the jump and their FO made some questionable moves earlier on to desperation moves latter that didn’t work.

We see it all the time and some players been exposed that not ever franchise really cares to win like that. Some guys are just happy to be owners and have a team with their FO just happy to be getting a paycheck.

Next what he has done IS special.

KD’s name is dropped, but it only worked with one team that was already a top tier team.

What about CP3, what about Melo, what about Harden, what about Russ, what about Barkley, what about a long list of players before and after Lebron that tried it and it didn’t work?
Barkley did team up with his fellow superstars in their prime. Lebron didn’t join teams, he formed super teams with stars in their prime to gain an advantage over the league. Imagine if after Shaq left Kobe joined up with Duncan instead of competing with his team until they became good enough to win, that’s Lebron teaming with prime DWade and Chris Bosh.
 

Raw Lyrics

Sunset Park
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
7,872
Reputation
2,786
Daps
29,578
Reppin
Brooklyn
Easy, because he refused to play off the ball and within a system. Why? because:

lebronpic.jpg


It has always been my contention, that in 2011 when Bron saw that Wade was on his way to winning the Finals MVP, he stopped playing. Bron would rather lose that finals than win it if it meant Wade got the Finals MVP.

If Bron played within an effective system, his points, assists and possibly rebounds would be lower (but he'd have more titles). He can't have that.

Bron would have gotten Pippen traded, you think Bron would have waited 4 years for Pippen to develop? You think Pippen would still be playing with Bron after his game 7, 2 point meltdown? Nah breh, phuk Development, Bron would have force the FO to ship Pippen's headache having ass out.

Also, people kill me when they say "but, but, but Jordan had Phil" Phil was a nobody in coaching when he took over the job and as a nobody he stepped to Mike and said "I'm taking the ball out of of your hands, whether you like it or not". Jordan acquiesced and as a result he's the GOAT.

With that being said, the fact that LeBron was able to win three traditional championships playing Bron-Ball is absurdly amazing.
 
Last edited:

Bryan Danielson

Jmare007 x Bryan Danielson x JLova = King Ghidorah
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
101,043
Reputation
8,961
Daps
198,195
Reppin
#We Are The Flash #DOOMSET #LukeCageSet #NEWLWO
Barkley did team up with his fellow superstars in their prime. Lebron didn’t join teams, he formed super teams with stars in their prime to gain an advantage over the league. Imagine if after Shaq left Kobe joined up with Duncan instead of competing with his team until they became good enough to win, that’s Lebron teaming with prime DWade and Chris Bosh.

Maaaaannnnn:russ:


fukk all that prime shyt:mjlol:

Yall gotta stop trynna

Jordan mostly played in an era where it was just him and a handful of other guys that was like really elite. That granted they was stars…… but very few in between.

Bron been playing in an era where every teams had or have 2-3 elite level superstars on their team. And they was in their primes.

There was “no advantage”

Hell if anything was catching up to what was going on already after being handicapped for years.

Duncan was already on a super team

Sorry there was no 90s Clippers teams with their leading scoring could barely score 20ppg:mjlol:


Back then in MJ era, if you averaged 17-22 ppg you was an allstar. Guys going 30+ was like :gladbron::gladbron::gladbron:
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,485
Reputation
6,125
Daps
45,057
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
Lebron is a great player, no one can deny this. According to you Lebron is the goat cause he got drafted to a trash team went on to win 4 MVPs and 4 rings, very impressive.

The only problem is the original #23 got drafted to a trash team and went on to win 5 MVPs and 6 rings, led a dynasty with 2 3-peats, led a 72-10 team to a chip, perfect record in the finals with no game 7. Didn’t lose 3 games in a row from like 1991-1998 when he played.

Kobe was the best player of his era 2000-2010. He won the most rings, scored the most points, avg the highest ppg, was the best defender at his position for the entire decade. Was the best offensive player in the league for that decade. Had the toughest path through the playoffs. Rescued the Lebron led Olympic team from collecting more Ls. Forced DWade to call up Lebron and form the Heatles with Chris Bosh. Kobe is the 1b boat. He is not the goat because that encompasses media awarded subjective awards, narratives and agendas.
LeBron is the GOAT because he (1)indisputably had the longest prime ever; (2)during that prime had arguably the highest peak ever; (3)during that peak and prime he won everywhere he went in a manner that is comparable to team dynasties...

I don't care so much about him being drafted into a trash team, as what he did with whatever team he had once he came into his own...

(4)He's the GOAT because he's still carrying this shaky league 21 years into his career. 99% of All-Timers didn't play 21 years and fewer of them held the mantle of face of The League even close to as long as he's held it...

(5)He's the GOAT because he exceeded every standard predicted of him upon entrance. When he was drafted in '03, not a single soul said "well he needs to go undefeated in Finals" or, "he needs 6 titles". You didn't say it and no one you knew said it either, I was watching basketball back then as I assume you were too, nobody put this fantastical bullshyt on him...

But people did say and have expectations that he needed to develop into an All-Time great player, and we know what that entails. Dominance thru play, MVPs, and championships, of course. He checked every box and did it a level higher than anyone in his era...

We didn't put a number to it, you LeBron antagonists started this shyt once his dominance started translating into titles. He didn't need a number on it, we got you in this thread saying a nikka with just one MVP is the best player ever, we got people who call Shaq the most dominant player with only 1 MVP. At the moment of Wilt's retirement 51 years ago, and for even a generation after that, we had people arguing he was the greatest and/or most dominant player ever with "only" 2 rings...

Until the post-Jordan era (post his retirement in '98) there was never this standard in NBA history that you needed to win a specific amount of titles to be considered arguably the GOAT. It's not a historical standard, its some bullshyt you Jordan riders started with nikkas who came after him----->which is hypocritical because it's well documented that people were calling Mike the GOAT long before he won his 6th championship...

So when you bring up "Finals record", its dishonest and irrelevant, nobody gave a fukk about how many losses you ever had in The Finals if you were a proven great, it only mattered how many times you won. Nobody ever said "you gotta have a winning Finals record" with Wilt's 2-4 record, instead the knock on Wilt was always his Regular Season Warrior status, and how he played well below that level postseason after postseason...

Nobody ever focused on Wilt's number of L's in The Finals, no one cared but its the fact that Wilt routinely and repeatedly played substandard in that round, and in earlier playoff rounds, compared to what he was doing in the 82, that what nikkas talked about...

"Finals record" is a bullshyt metric Jordan nikkas came up with but they dont use this metric when Russell's name comes up. The lack of across the board consistency from Jordan Stans is the worst part of NBA discourse...

LeBron lost 6 Finals and only ONE, just one, is attributable to his play. And he's taken more than his share of arrows for that weak ass showing in the last dozen years, no one excuses it, no one denies it, no one disagrees that he's the chief reason his team didn't win that title...

"Team hopping" is another irrelevant metric that Jordan nikkas started. nikkas always pushed they way into advantageous positions, are you not aware of Wilt's career? Shaq's career? The angling Magic and Kobe's representatives did on their behalf before they were drafted?

Stop it, it's a dumb ass qualifier that nobody gave a shyt less about until the way LeBron created his success started adding rings...

Mike played in an era that allowed for a run of dominance that'll never be duplicated. That alone (2 3peats, undefeated in Finals), are legacy points but they are NOT anything to hinge his GOAT case on. You Mike nikkas have the weakest arguments. That 90s era is dominated could've been done by several of the pantheon GOATs if they came of age at the same time...

I'm consistent though, whereas you Mike nikkas don't have a consistent standard anywhere. I say the exact same thing about Bill Russell---->he played in an era that allowed for unprecedented dominance that will NEVER be seen again. It's a legacy point for him, and Mike, because they are the guys who did that relative to their competition, but its irrelevant when comparing across generations. These other nikkas with legit GOAT claims didnt come of age in the 60s or 90s, and they werent direct competitors to Mike or Bill. Therefore, the total number of championships or Finals record doesn't matter...

The strongest arguments for Mike, is that at his apex, he dominated his peers to quite possibly a higher degree than anyone else in their eras. And in doing so he hoarded championships along the way, and while he had some bad games, there is no "choke" on his resume. But we don't have to pretend that Mike's championships success came with the Showtime Lakers or Bird Celtics at their apex, and we don't need to pretend that the era Mike was winning all these titles had Kevin Durants and Kawhi Leonard's and fully developed Kobe Bryant's as competition...

The dishonest argument of Mike backers is fukking annoying. He was HERE in his era, and after Bird and Magic left...









the next closest guys were here...

But he's not running up 6 rings in any other era other than the one he won them in...

Kobe was arguably the best player of his era, right there with Duncan, no argument from me there. They dominated 00s ball and as young black kids we related to Kobe more than Tim because of Kobe's flash, his game was more exciting, he was more relatable, and he was loud whereas Duncan was this slow boring big who didn't talk...

I have no problem with saying Kobe was the greatest player of that era as long as the discussion is objective to what Duncan also did in that same era. It's funny, you love equating Steph and Bron as equals of their era, the gap in performance is larger between those two than it ever was between Duncan and Kobe 🤣 more Jordan Propaganda inconsistency...
Barkley did team up with his fellow superstars in their prime. Lebron didn’t join teams, he formed super teams with stars in their prime to gain an advantage over the league. Imagine if after Shaq left Kobe joined up with Duncan instead of competing with his team until they became good enough to win, that’s Lebron teaming with prime DWade and Chris Bosh.
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,485
Reputation
6,125
Daps
45,057
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
There is no legitimate case for Kobe as GOAT. Or BOAT or whatever term you wanna use:

•he didn't come in tearing The League up instantly (Mike, Bron, Bird, Kareem, Wilt, Duncan, Shaq all did)
•his game as a #1 only translated to two championships and four Finals runs, which in and of itself is outstanding, but that's not GOAT production as a #1
•he won most, 3 outta 5, of his rings as a #2. Nobody else in the conversation won MOST of their rings as a #2, and let's be honest, if he was That Guy on a "man this the best I ever seen level", he wasn't ever have been anyone's #2. His game would've outright proven he was the best player on championship teams, there would be no 1a/1b qualifiers between he abd Shaq

•his postseason resume really isn't that great. A bunch of lesser players have better postseason resumes---->Kawhi has a much more consistent record of tearing thru shyt in the playoffs than Kobe, but is obviously a lesser player than Kobe historically. Kawhi isn't the only one either
•his best Finals performance came vs a Magic team that wasn't ready for that stage. Not a ringing endorsement for a player who's the greatest ever, when your teammate put up more consistently dominant performances (Shaq) at that round, you were not the best player in either series vs the rival C's, etc.

I can keeping going. There is no objective reason to call Kobe the greatest ever---->though subjectively it satisfies the senses, and agendas, to say he was the "closest thing to Mike"....

And therein is the root problem, you nikkas watch basketball comparing nikkas to Mike. I watch basketball comparing great players to the collective standard of All-Time greatness...
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
14,822
Reputation
2,165
Daps
70,723
Reppin
NULL
By your logic Draymond Green has a better Goat case then LeBron because he was part and a key piece of a dynasty.

Yall gotta stop making these responses. The GOAT case is a holistic process. No different than grad school.

GPA, test scores, work experience, etc.

Robert Horry got a 2.0 GPA and a 190 GRE. He'd be lucky to go to University of Phoenix. He's not a GOAT.

GOATs have to meet a minimum threshold and then we can start nitpicking to see who ranks where.
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
14,822
Reputation
2,165
Daps
70,723
Reppin
NULL
Easy, because he refused to play off the ball and within a system. Why? because:

lebronpic.jpg


It has always been my contention, that in 2011 when Bron saw that Wade was on his way to winning the Finals MVP, he stopped playing. Bron would rather lose that finals than win it if it meant Wade got the Finals MVP.

If Bron played within an effective system, his points, assists and possibly rebounds would be lower (but he'd have more titles). He can't have that.

Bron would have gotten Pippen traded, you think Bron would have waited 4 years for Pippen to develop? You think Pippen would still be playing with Bron after his game 7, 2 point meltdown? Nah breh, phuk Development, Bron would have force the FO to ship Pippen's headache having ass out.

Also, people kill me when they say "but, but, but Jordan had Phil" Phil was a nobody in coaching when he took over the job and as a nobody he stepped to Mike and said "I'm taking the ball out of of your hands, whether you like it or not". Jordan acquiesced and as a result he's the GOAT.

With that being said, the fact that LeBron was able to win three traditional championships playing Bron-Ball is absurdly amazing.

With all of Bron's God Given talents......if he just had a better mentality, he would have won 3-4 rings in Cleveland....the traditional way. And we'd be talking about him vs. Jordan legitimately. Even with less rings it would be an argument still because he'd have 4 MVPs, the scoring record, more longevity, beating Golden State, etc. If he was a stronger person he could've made Cleveland into a dynasty. But he created all these superteams, bouncing whenever things got hard. It makes it hard to respect it when people claim he's the best. If he was really that guy, he would have did what I said above.
 

Koli_Kat

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
5,258
Reputation
518
Daps
22,152
Yall gotta stop making these responses. The GOAT case is a holistic process. No different than grad school.

GPA, test scores, work experience, etc.

Robert Horry got a 2.0 GPA and a 190 GRE. He'd be lucky to go to University of Phoenix. He's not a GOAT.

GOATs have to meet a minimum threshold and then we can start nitpicking to see who ranks where.

Yeah but who determines the threshold? That's all subjective.
 

Koli_Kat

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 3, 2018
Messages
5,258
Reputation
518
Daps
22,152
With all of Bron's God Given talents......if he just had a better mentality, he would have won 3-4 rings in Cleveland....the traditional way. And we'd be talking about him vs. Jordan legitimately. Even with less rings it would be an argument still because he'd have 4 MVPs, the scoring record, more longevity, beating Golden State, etc. If he was a stronger person he could've made Cleveland into a dynasty. But he created all these superteams, bouncing whenever things got hard. It makes it hard to respect it when people claim he's the best. If he was really that guy, he would have did what I said above.

This doesn't make sense bc if you put Jordan on the cavs instead of the wizards and given him any other coach aside from Phil Jackson the outcome is different..

You speak of a dynasty as if Jordan drafted the whole bulls team, hired the coach and trainers and developed players and came up with the plays.

Once again a dynasty is a function of a complete organization - not a single player. Which makes Op's question null and void
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,695
Reputation
-546
Daps
21,639
This doesn't make sense bc if you put Jordan on the cavs instead of the wizards and given him any other coach aside from Phil Jackson the outcome is different..

You speak of a dynasty as if Jordan drafted the whole bulls team, hired the coach and trainers and developed players and came up with the plays.

Once again a dynasty is a function of a complete organization - not a single player. Which makes Op's question null and void
Dynasties start with having an historically great player then build from there. Why y’all Bron stans play the coulda woulda shoulda game so much, we dealing with reality not nba2k
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,485
Reputation
6,125
Daps
45,057
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
Dynasties start with having an historically great player then build from there. Why y’all Bron stans play the coulda woulda shoulda game so much, we dealing with reality not nba2k
Who builds the dynasty? And how long are great player required to stay in situations that show minimal to no traction towards being perennial contenders?

I would like you to answer these questions, please. Because hopefully, if you're an honest person, you see how subjective any answer to them are. There's no line on how long guys owe the team to build the optimal roster for them. You could put a number on it and 10 other people could have a different length of time, what makes yours or mine or anyone else's opinion the right answer?
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,695
Reputation
-546
Daps
21,639
LeBron is the GOAT because he (1)indisputably had the longest prime ever; (2)during that prime had arguably the highest peak ever; (3)during that peak and prime he won everywhere he went in a manner that is comparable to team dynasties...

I don't care so much about him being drafted into a trash team, as what he did with whatever team he had once he came into his own...

(4)He's the GOAT because he's still carrying this shaky league 21 years into his career. 99% of All-Timers didn't play 21 years and fewer of them held the mantle of face of The League even close to as long as he's held it...

(5)He's the GOAT because he exceeded every standard predicted of him upon entrance. When he was drafted in '03, not a single soul said "well he needs to go undefeated in Finals" or, "he needs 6 titles". You didn't say it and no one you knew said it either, I was watching basketball back then as I assume you were too, nobody put this fantastical bullshyt on him...

But people did say and have expectations that he needed to develop into an All-Time great player, and we know what that entails. Dominance thru play, MVPs, and championships, of course. He checked every box and did it a level higher than anyone in his era...

We didn't put a number to it, you LeBron antagonists started this shyt once his dominance started translating into titles. He didn't need a number on it, we got you in this thread saying a nikka with just one MVP is the best player ever, we got people who call Shaq the most dominant player with only 1 MVP. At the moment of Wilt's retirement 51 years ago, and for even a generation after that, we had people arguing he was the greatest and/or most dominant player ever with "only" 2 rings...

Until the post-Jordan era (post his retirement in '98) there was never this standard in NBA history that you needed to win a specific amount of titles to be considered arguably the GOAT. It's not a historical standard, its some bullshyt you Jordan riders started with nikkas who came after him----->which is hypocritical because it's well documented that people were calling Mike the GOAT long before he won his 6th championship...

So when you bring up "Finals record", its dishonest and irrelevant, nobody gave a fukk about how many losses you ever had in The Finals if you were a proven great, it only mattered how many times you won. Nobody ever said "you gotta have a winning Finals record" with Wilt's 2-4 record, instead the knock on Wilt was always his Regular Season Warrior status, and how he played well below that level postseason after postseason...

Nobody ever focused on Wilt's number of L's in The Finals, no one cared but its the fact that Wilt routinely and repeatedly played substandard in that round, and in earlier playoff rounds, compared to what he was doing in the 82, that what nikkas talked about...

"Finals record" is a bullshyt metric Jordan nikkas came up with but they dont use this metric when Russell's name comes up. The lack of across the board consistency from Jordan Stans is the worst part of NBA discourse...

LeBron lost 6 Finals and only ONE, just one, is attributable to his play. And he's taken more than his share of arrows for that weak ass showing in the last dozen years, no one excuses it, no one denies it, no one disagrees that he's the chief reason his team didn't win that title...

"Team hopping" is another irrelevant metric that Jordan nikkas started. nikkas always pushed they way into advantageous positions, are you not aware of Wilt's career? Shaq's career? The angling Magic and Kobe's representatives did on their behalf before they were drafted?

Stop it, it's a dumb ass qualifier that nobody gave a shyt less about until the way LeBron created his success started adding rings...

Mike played in an era that allowed for a run of dominance that'll never be duplicated. That alone (2 3peats, undefeated in Finals), are legacy points but they are NOT anything to hinge his GOAT case on. You Mike nikkas have the weakest arguments. That 90s era is dominated could've been done by several of the pantheon GOATs if they came of age at the same time...

I'm consistent though, whereas you Mike nikkas don't have a consistent standard anywhere. I say the exact same thing about Bill Russell---->he played in an era that allowed for unprecedented dominance that will NEVER be seen again. It's a legacy point for him, and Mike, because they are the guys who did that relative to their competition, but its irrelevant when comparing across generations. These other nikkas with legit GOAT claims didnt come of age in the 60s or 90s, and they werent direct competitors to Mike or Bill. Therefore, the total number of championships or Finals record doesn't matter...

The strongest arguments for Mike, is that at his apex, he dominated his peers to quite possibly a higher degree than anyone else in their eras. And in doing so he hoarded championships along the way, and while he had some bad games, there is no "choke" on his resume. But we don't have to pretend that Mike's championships success came with the Showtime Lakers or Bird Celtics at their apex, and we don't need to pretend that the era Mike was winning all these titles had Kevin Durants and Kawhi Leonard's and fully developed Kobe Bryant's as competition...

The dishonest argument of Mike backers is fukking annoying. He was HERE in his era, and after Bird and Magic left...









the next closest guys were here...

But he's not running up 6 rings in any other era other than the one he won them in...

Kobe was arguably the best player of his era, right there with Duncan, no argument from me there. They dominated 00s ball and as young black kids we related to Kobe more than Tim because of Kobe's flash, his game was more exciting, he was more relatable, and he was loud whereas Duncan was this slow boring big who didn't talk...

I have no problem with saying Kobe was the greatest player of that era as long as the discussion is objective to what Duncan also did in that same era. It's funny, you love equating Steph and Bron as equals of their era, the gap in performance is larger between those two than it ever was between Duncan and Kobe 🤣 more Jordan Propaganda inconsistency...
You just posted an emotional rant that doesn’t move the needle. If Lebron was going to be goat he would have past the standards set by the consensus goat MJ. 21+ years and counting and he still hasn’t and thus that ship has sailed.

You use Lebron’s achievements and accolades to big him up but have a problem when MJ’s far superior achievements and accolades are brought up in comparison.

Remember it was Lebron who wanted to associate himself with Mike’s greatness and not the other way around. So despite what you think Lebron believes MJ is the standard by which his game is judged.
 

Peruvian Connect

All Star
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
6,214
Reputation
-2,324
Daps
11,685
Reppin
NULL
Who builds the dynasty? And how long are great player required to stay in situations that show minimal to no traction towards being perennial contenders?

I would like you to answer these questions, please. Because hopefully, if you're an honest person, you see how subjective any answer to them are. There's no line on how long guys owe the team to build the optimal roster for them. You could put a number on it and 10 other people could have a different length of time, what makes yours or mine or anyone else's opinion the right answer?
Cavs were contedbers. LeBron quit and took the easy route. Call it what it is
 
Top