How Good Was Reggie Miller Actually?

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,484
Reputation
8,427
Daps
195,802
Reppin
BX, NYC
luxury of scoring a larger portion of their points on the break, or on defensive breakdowns.
Reggie was not a great athlete, he didn't rebound, he wasn't a great ball handler, didn't come up with a lot of steals/turnovers. He just didn't have the skillset to be a great transition scorer. I don't get the luxury term. :jbhmm:
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
68,748
Reputation
10,698
Daps
232,109
Son is in the HoF as a 5x All-Star and 3x All-NBA Third Team.

I’ve seen people put him in their top 50’s. Miller very overrated because of his charisma and clutch moments that became part of the culture and lore of 90’s NBA. He was a very good player, but that’s it.
The fact it took Mitch Richmond, who was a 3x All-NBA SECOND Team player longer to get the call than Reggie says it all.
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
76,964
Reputation
11,298
Daps
198,530
Reppin
Lamb of God
I got Nash because of shooting ability, similar size at 6’3, and insane core strength that allows them be elite finishers at the rim despite being below the rim players.

I don’t really see Hardaway :patrice:
I never seen the innate PG skills from Curry that Nash had. Hardaway was an unstoppable 1v1 player due to his handles, agility and finishing skills which is similar to Curry. Curry and Hardaway were scoring guards. Nash is a playmaker true PG
 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,484
Reputation
8,427
Daps
195,802
Reppin
BX, NYC
Hell naw...
Maybe they can be, but they haven't proven it yet...
They haven't had better careers, but I think they're more talented basketball players than Miller.

Beal is a great shooter himself, he can defend, he can run the P&R, he can put the ball on the floor he has isolation moves including a nasty step back, he can get to the rim.

McCollum is a complete three zone scorer on a completely different level as a ball handler, I actually feel Lillard holds him back in a way.
 
Last edited:

Lord_Chief_Rocka

Superstar
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
17,721
Reputation
1,480
Daps
50,042
Son is in the HoF as a 5x All-Star and 3x All-NBA Third Team.

I’ve seen people put him in their top 50’s. Miller very overrated because of his charisma and clutch moments that became part of the culture and lore of 90’s NBA. He was a very good player, but that’s it.
I mean he’s probably somewhere 60-80

He was actually hurt by the era. Very slow and physical.
 

MoneyTron

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,256
Reputation
3,607
Daps
102,231
Reppin
Atlanta
Son is in the HoF as a 5x All-Star and 3x All-NBA Third Team.

I’ve seen people put him in their top 50’s. Miller very overrated because of his charisma and clutch moments that became part of the culture and lore of 90’s NBA. He was a very good player, but that’s it.
All facts.

nikkas saying he overrated is tripping. Put Reggie in this era and he'd still be an All Star. Windshield wiper on offense, off them screens like Klay and Rip.
In this guard and wing heavy NBA, I don’t see him making the ASG consistently. He didn’t do it often in the 90’s either.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: ISO

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,484
Reputation
8,427
Daps
195,802
Reppin
BX, NYC
Where do y'all think players like Buddy Hield and Klay Thompson stack up with Reggie in terms of skillsets?

I think both those guys have some dimensions to their game that Reggie didn't :hubie:

My nikka Buddy breaking out :mjcry:
 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,484
Reputation
8,427
Daps
195,802
Reppin
BX, NYC
I mean he’s probably somewhere 60-80

He was actually hurt by the era. Very slow and physical.
He also played in the 80's and early 90's which were high paced. :manny:

I think he's more hurt by the limitations he had on his game rather than the era he played in.
 

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,698
Reputation
1,100
Daps
34,310
LeBron has 7 seasons of 60% TS% and another 3 of 59%. His best season was 65% in 2014, when his best sidekick was a washed, injured D-Wade who only played 50 games.

MJ only had 4 60% TS seasons total, none better than 61%, and if he wasn't a better free throw shooter than Bron he would have had zero.

Legit what do you think you're proving other than that Bron is only an average FT shooter? :what:

Do you think before posting? Your dumbass uses no context for the generations players played in. Reggie played in the slow paced 90's before three point shooting become a major thing and averaged nearly 40% from three at 5 attempts a game. You put him in this era and he's taking around 10 a game with likely better shooting percentages as it's more of focus these days.

You put Jordan in this era with all the spacing provided by three point shooting and he'd never have a true shooting percentage below 60%.
 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,484
Reputation
8,427
Daps
195,802
Reppin
BX, NYC
And in 2000, he wasnt even the leader of that squad. It was Jalen Rose who was the leagues MIP. The Pacers FINALLY found a player in Jalen who could create his own shot. Maybe if Reggie had that ability in his one dimensional arsenal, the Pacers would have seen a finals appearance in the 90s. :camby:
:picard: Harsh realities
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
76,964
Reputation
11,298
Daps
198,530
Reppin
Lamb of God
Where do y'all think players like Buddy Hield and Klay Thompson stack up with Reggie in terms of skillsets?

I think both those guys have some dimensions to their game that Reggie didn't :hubie:

My nikka Buddy breaking out :mjcry:

Hield can put the ball on the deck and he gets a lot of transitions Buckets. He also can finish around the basket. If he continues down this trajectory, he should he much better than Miller. Not to mention, his defense is decent due to his long arms and strength
 

ISO

Pass me the rock nikka
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
61,484
Reputation
8,427
Daps
195,802
Reppin
BX, NYC
Hield can put the ball on the deck and he gets a lot of transitions Buckets. He also can finish around the basket. If he continues down this trajectory, he should he much better than Miller. Not to mention, his defense is decent due to his long arms and strength
Yup, and he's also one of the top rebounders at his position.
 

Youngdev

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
11,763
Reputation
1,479
Daps
54,881
He was the father of Ray Allen and Steph Curry's style. He was good but clearly a step behind Jordan. He was in the same category as Barkley, Gary Payton, Drexler, etc. The Pacers just didn't have enough firepower to match the Bulls and they definitely had no answer for Shaq. Had he had more help he could have won a ring or two. The eras were different so nikkas weren't ring chasing and creating superteams but, giving it some thought, Reggie would've been a good addition to the Spurs. Him and D-Rob would've been a good combo, and once Timmy came it would've been over.


Reggie is a tier below all those guys you named.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
85,146
Reputation
9,387
Daps
230,220
I don't give credit for hypotheticals.
Less hypothetical, and more so looking at how an offense functions. No different to saying any and every player could average more points if they wanted to, but at what cost?
Who cares if he could have scored more he didn't? If you admit him scoring more would've hurt the team how great was he really?
In part, that's what made his scoring important because it wasn't scoring in conflict with offensive flow; he scored when his team typically needed him to, not when he wanted to. And again, that's not to say he couldn't have been more aggressive, or that I'm ranking him above players who averaged more points, it's just to say it's not as simple as taking the points he averaged, and valuing his play in accordance to that, in a vacuum (he also didn't have the luxury of getting transition/junk points like a lot of main ball-handlers do - he scored almost entirely in the halfcourt when defenses were set).
The point is even for his gravity and the way his shooting could open up the offense he also had the benefit of having an offense designed around getting him those looks.
He created the majority of his looks with his off-ball movement - it was less design, and more his own ability.
He's not a player you could've gave the ball to and let him create his own offense.
Certainly not to the same degree as MJ, but he still could put the ball on the floor and create his own offense at a high level, he wasn't just catching and shooting: great at drawing contact, dribbling to create his own space, give-and-go actions, elbow/baseline action pull-ups. He made quick decisions whenever he got the ball (if there was no opening initially, he'd move the ball on and relocate; he had a quick-fire attack mentality that kept the defense on the back foot), which is why there's this perception he couldn't create his own offense, as he wasn't always trying to break down his defender in ISO like other high-volume scorers.
He was bad on D.
Another common misconception.

He was regularly tasked with defending the best perimeter threat (mostly because all throughout his career he was surrounded by less-capable defenders), and while he wasn't clamping players, he made them work hard due to his conditioning, length, the innate ability to track all around the halfcourt (due to his own off-ball movements on offense), and cognizant of the tricks of the trade (again, because of his own craftiness on offense).
He could not create shots for others..
He wasn't a special playmaker, by any means, but he knew how to find the open man when he'd draw extra attention, and kept the ball moving if he wasn't going to do anything with it (which naturally led to making plays for his teammates) - that is more important than him holding onto the ball waiting for someone to get open.
All that matters, otherwise we'd have been hyping Kyle Korver as one of the best players in the league as well.
Kyle Korver? Really? Someone who never had to anchor an offense (let alone do it for well over a decade), or be depended on to carry the volume scoring is who you're comparing Reggie to?

:aicmon:
 
Top