How Can Something Go Against Nature If Nature, Itself, Has No Actual Purpose?

[Knuckles Red]

Do you have an answer?

 

[Software]

We, as human beings, have social/political/religious purposes, but all of those are subjective purposes created by humans. You couldn't say that there is an actual purpose of creating life, or to life itself. So how does one go against something, like nature, that has no actual purpose? What would it even mean to go against nature?

Nature's purpose is to sustain itself breh /thread

 

[Knuckles Red]

Nature's purpose is to sustain itself breh /thread

Your answer is "what." My question is "why?"

 

[thekingsmen]

So here is the philosophy answered....Both OP and @ThreeLetterAgency are asexual. Go fukk yourselves.

 

[Birdie]

Just come out of the closet already.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@Mechatronic out here saying he everyone else is taking the convo too seriously, but handing out negs

Cry on, lil bytch

 

[Jean Jacket]

@Mechatronic out here saying he everyone else is taking the convo too seriously, but handing out negs

Cry on, lil bytch

I don't normally neg. But when I do...




Good morning. Enjoy your grits and Negs.

We got nothing more to build on.

 

[JOHN.KOOL]

If 50% of humanity was gay we would eventually die out. If you dont believe in anything else surely it's natural for us to survive.

 

[Jahmal]

Breh u will not find a normal guy caping for gays and trannies

 

[BlackSexyllence]

Are you gay? or yes?

 

[Knuckles Red]

If 50% of humanity was gay we would eventually die out. If you dont believe in anything else surely it's natural for us to survive.

Nature has no actual purpose. It just is. Procreation has no actual purpose. Its just something we do, so your comment leads me back to my original question. A question that no one has been able to answer.

 

[BaldingSoHard]

I've seen, multiple times on here, posters commenting that homosexuality, "goes against nature." The example is usually that two men/women can't produce a child. That is true, but to say that homosexuality goes against nature implies that nature (evolution/biology) has an ACTUAL purpose outside of the ones we, as human beings, have attached to it. Of course there is the natural drive to reproduce, and we see these patterns all throughout the animal kingdom, but there is no ACTUAL purpose of life. There is no ACTUAL purpose of human life. It just is. So how can something go against nature if nature, itself, has no actual purpose?

You covered it, breh. Reproduction is the only purpose of biology. That's why homosexuality is unnatural, it defies nature / evolution (assuming homosexuality is a genetic trait and not a choice).

 

[010101]

nature accomplishes reproduction in other ways besides male/female pairings
attitudes on sexuality are more cultural/imagined
like i said live and let live

*

 

[Knuckles Red]

You covered it, breh. Reproduction is the only purpose of biology. That's why homosexuality is unnatural, it defies nature / evolution (assuming homosexuality is a genetic trait and not a choice).

Biology has causes and effects, but that does not mean it has an actual purpose...outside of the ones we attach to it. Also, you taking that element of life [reproduction], and declaring it to be the true purpose of it all is solely your own prejudice.

 

[BaldingSoHard]

Biology has causes and effects, but that does not mean it has an actual purpose...outside of the ones we attach to it. Also, you taking that element of life [reproduction], and declaring it to be the true purpose of it all is your solely your own prejudice.

You're overcomplicating this, not sure if trolling.

The purpose of life is to go on. That's why survival instincts are so prevalent in nature. We do that through eating, protecting our families, and through procreation. This isn't rocket surgery.