I didn't intend to lessen the importance of the positions that I described. Dude, I am an African American Descendant of slaves. Growing up, I was taught that white people went over to Africa and enslaved us by force. Never in a million years did I think that slavery was only possible because of African cooperators. I knew some Africans helped, but I didn't know that the transatlantic slave trade was practically hinged on their involvement. Africans to the slave trade are like engines to cars. Doesn't work without them. I'm very critical of Africans' role in the slave trade and I'm not going make excuses for them. I'm critical of whites' and arabs' role as well.
Also, I understand that some African countries and tribes, like the Zulus and other people, were against the slave trade. My point is that if a country participated in the slave trade, they can't rationalize it by saying they were selling members of an opposing nation. The fact is, they were supporting the very construct that was enslaving members of their own nation. White merchants wanted black slaves, they didn't care about national differences This should have been a hint or clue to black nations about the concept of "race" and that action needed to be taken against "others." And yet people keep telling me that they didn't know race existed back then. How? People keep saying that they weren't selling their own, they were selling their enemies. The end result was all sides lost a lot of their people to slavery, a system they allowed, supported, and strengthened. Did the white merchants pretend to care about what nation the slave came from? Maybe you know more about that.